BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

rural urban suburban.

Expert replies
by PAB2706 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:24 am
Driving under the influence is a more severe problem among college students at rural and suburban universities than at urban universities. Social scientists wanted to determine how much of the problem is due to the distance students must drive to obtain alcohol. They looked at police records for incidents involving students at a number of universities, and compared those with the mean distances between student housing and bars and liquor stores. The longer the distances, the more likely students were to be arrested or involved in accidents.

Which of the following, if true, would it be most important to take into account in evaluating the result?
(A) Many college students do not purchase alcohol at bars or liquor stores.
(B) Students at rural, suburban, and urban universities are arrested for driving under the influence more frequently than are non-student members of their communities.
(C) The average enrollment at urban universities is greater than that at rural and suburban universities.
(D) Local sheriff's departments near rural and suburban universities devote more resources to identifying and arresting those driving under the influence than do urban police forces.
(E) The number of bars and liquor stores per square mile is nearly five times as high in urban areas as it is in rural and suburban areas
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by tom4lax » Wed Sep 09, 2009 4:43 pm
Interesting. I narrowed it down to A & D, but had a hard time moving from there. IMO A.

OA?
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Wed Sep 09, 2009 5:29 pm
Not sure, is it E?
Join the discussion

by sanp_l » Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:48 pm
I go with option A.

Anything which compares rural, suburban and urban factors can be ignored.
Sandy
Join the discussion

by PAB2706 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 7:48 pm
OA given is D and i am not convinced....i saw this question on other forum... my answer was E...


D can make sense but one has to think a bit out of scope and according to me this is a must be true question... so the answer has to be implied in the passage itself.

your thoughts?
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:18 pm
to evaluate the result: longer distances travelled lead to more arrests (given that the problem of drink-driving is graver in suburban and rural areas than urban areas)

D seems better than all others.

A. doesnt affect conclusion. doesnt bring into picture the difference between the intensity of drink-driving in rural and urban areas

B. student-non student difference is out of scope

C. enrollment has no correlation with drink-driving

E. density of bars in an area has no breaing on the distance one must travel to obtain alcohol

D. an yes answer to this question weakens the conclusion (identifies an alternate reason why more arrests in sub-urbs/rural areas) and a no answer strengthens the conclusion. hence, D
Last edited by scoobydooby on Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Sep 10, 2009 12:55 am
@scoobydooby,

just my two cents -

If the density of the bars is more in urban areas compared with rural areas, then it does evaluate the argument, as it is a matter of concern.

To an extent, D is also a valid evaluation, but not sure of the reason to eliminate E.

scoobydooby wrote:conclusion: more incidents/arrests(drink-driving problems) in rural/suburban universities than in urban universities

E. density of bars in an area has no breaing on the distance one must travel to obtain alcohol
Join the discussion

by scoobydooby » Thu Sep 10, 2009 2:42 am
hey, mehravikas

E only talks about the relative number of bars in the rural and urban areas, with that info we cannot evaluate the result that longer distances travelled lead to more arrests/incidents.
a larger density of bars may not imply larger distances travelled.

ej:say the rural area has 1 bar in the university campus and the urban area has 5 bars in the university campus.so distances students must travel to obtain alcohol may/may not be greater with a greater density of bars
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Thu Sep 10, 2009 11:29 am
I think you are correct.

'D' makes sense now....it evaluates the argument as false.
Join the discussion

by vivek.kapoor83 » Fri Sep 11, 2009 10:18 am
it should be D....
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Fri Sep 11, 2009 11:55 pm
Intially I was tempted to go for E.
But Density of bars has no corelation with distance.
It could be that many bars can be located in a certain pockets of the locality and that is far way from the colleges be it urban or suburban & rural.

But "Driving under influence" will come in to picture only when it is " monitored" by police.

SO D exactly bring that point to notice.
Join the discussion

by kris77 » Sun May 15, 2016 4:27 pm
I like the explanation on E
Join the discussion