Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
A. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper crops, sugar beet and walnut in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
B. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but in the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
C. Pests had destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region, but more effective pest-control methods that were introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
D. In the 1880s, pests destroyed grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region and more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry.
E. In the 1880s, more effective pest-control methods saved the citrus industry from what was destroying grape, celery, chili pepper, sugar beet and walnut crops in the region.
Please post answers with explanations.
Source: MGMAT
OA - B..
Grape, Celery, Chili pepper...
This topic has expert replies
- pradeepkaushal9518
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1309
- Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 11:41 pm
- Thanked: 33 times
- Followed by:5 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 10:44 am
- Thanked: 70 times
- Followed by:6 members
IMO C.
A - 1. word crops is misplaced. It should be after walnut.
2. Altered intent - The statement suggests that more effective pest control methods saved the citrus industry in the 1880s. The intended meaning is that newer pest control methods introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
B - Altered intent - The statement suggests that more effective pest control methods saved the citrus industry in the 1880s. The intended meaning is that newer pest control methods introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
C - Correct
D - 1. use of and is incorrect - A contrast is being shown, so but is the right conjunction.
E - 1. was destroying is incorrect tense here - had destroyed would have been better here.
A - 1. word crops is misplaced. It should be after walnut.
2. Altered intent - The statement suggests that more effective pest control methods saved the citrus industry in the 1880s. The intended meaning is that newer pest control methods introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
B - Altered intent - The statement suggests that more effective pest control methods saved the citrus industry in the 1880s. The intended meaning is that newer pest control methods introduced in the 1880s saved the citrus industry.
C - Correct
D - 1. use of and is incorrect - A contrast is being shown, so but is the right conjunction.
E - 1. was destroying is incorrect tense here - had destroyed would have been better here.
scio me nihil scire
- GMAT Hacker
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:35 am
- Thanked: 1 times
uwhusky wrote:Let's not just shout out answer without providing any type of evidence or thought...It just doesn't help the discussion at all.adi_800 wrote:Has to be B...
Both B and C is grammetically correct. But it has to do with meaning clarity. Choice C changes the meaning of the sentence. In choice C, 'that' refers to method, which is problematic. According to C, which says method used in 1880's saved the citrus industry. But we really don't know if citrus industry saved in 1880 or later.
But, choice B maintain intended original meaning. Hence QA B
- uwhusky
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1172
- Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pm
- Thanked: 74 times
- Followed by:4 members
I'll just copy and paste the link with discussion already in place.
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/vie ... &view=next
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/vie ... &view=next
Yep.