BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Round 0.4999999 to integer?

Problem Solving — algebra and arithmetic (GMAT Focus Edition)
Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Source: — Quantitative Reasoning |
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 34 times

by krusta80 » Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:25 pm
pinktoadette wrote:Dumb question

When you round 0.499999, is it 0 or 1? I thought 1 at first but,...
..if it's repeating 9s? It never reaches 0.5, so 0..?


Thanks!!
0
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 amFollowed by: 266 members
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Fri Mar 02, 2012 7:39 am
0... .5 is the cutoff. Don't round multiple times.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 03, 2012 12:31 pm
pinktoadette wrote: When you round 0.499999, is it 0 or 1? I thought 1 at first but,...
..if it's repeating 9s? It never reaches 0.5, so 0..?
Your question about the repeating 9's is interesting.

It can be argued that 0.4999...(9's repeating forever) is equal to 0.5

Proof #1
If 0.4999...(forever) does not equal 0.5, then there must exist some number BETWEEN 0.4999... and 0.5
Since no such number exists, we must conclude that 0.4999.... is equal to 0.5, in which case rounding it to the nearest integer would be 1.

Proof #2
Another way to look at it is to say that 0.4999..... = 0.4 + 0.0999...

Well, 0.0999... is equal to 0.1
Here's why.
We know that 1/30 = 0.0333...
So, 3/30 = 0.0999...
But we already know that 3/30 = 0.1
So, 0.0999... must equal 0.1, which means that 0.4999..... = 0.4 + 0.0999... = 0.4 + 0.1 = 0.5


Having said all of that, this would never be tested on the GMAT.


Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 105 times

by vikram4689 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 7:14 pm
Brent,
I think answer would be 0 because in explanation above we round off 2 times which we should not do.

I tried this in EXCEL as well :)
0.4999 = 0.500 = 0.50 = 0.5 = 0 [no. of digits = no. of significant digits allowed, and then i reduced the no. of significant digits one by one]
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 03, 2012 10:59 pm
vikram4689 wrote:Brent,
I think answer would be 0 because in explanation above we round off 2 times which we should not do.

I tried this in EXCEL as well :)
0.4999 = 0.500 = 0.50 = 0.5 = 0 [no. of digits = no. of significant digits allowed, and then i reduced the no. of significant digits one by one]
Well, we're already getting into some esoteric/out-of-scope territory, but I will suggest that we're not rounding two times. First, we're recognizing that 0.4999... = 0.5 (no rounding yet), and then we round 0.5 to 1.

Also, I'm having a hard time believing that you entered an infinite number of 9's in Excel. That would have taken quite a while :-)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 34 times

by krusta80 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:07 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
vikram4689 wrote:Brent,
I think answer would be 0 because in explanation above we round off 2 times which we should not do.

I tried this in EXCEL as well :)
0.4999 = 0.500 = 0.50 = 0.5 = 0 [no. of digits = no. of significant digits allowed, and then i reduced the no. of significant digits one by one]
Well, we're already getting into some esoteric/out-of-scope territory, but I will suggest that we're not rounding two times. First, we're recognizing that 0.4999... = 0.5 (no rounding yet), and then we round 0.5 to 1.

Also, I'm having a hard time believing that you entered an infinite number of 9's in Excel. That would have taken quite a while :-)

Cheers,
Brent
The interesting thing about infinite 9's as a decimal is that it has no equivalent fraction. :)

That said, I'm wondering why the original poster is asking the question? I've seen something like this happen in computer programming when dealing with decimals. In those cases, it's important to realize that the computer isn't rounding as much as it's simply misrepresenting the TRUE value, which in this case would be .5
Last edited by krusta80 on Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 105 times

by vikram4689 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:09 pm
Haha, but we are talking about 0.4999999 and not 0.4999999....infinity.
and 0.4999999 is NOT equal to 0.5 so if we have to answer "0.4999999 to integer?" then it would be 0
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:11 pm
krusta80 wrote: The interesting thing about infinite 9's as a decimal is that it has no equivalent fraction. :)
I'm not sure I agree with that.

We know that 1/9 = 0.1111...(with infinite 1's)
And 2/9 = 0.2222...(with infinite 2's)
And 3/9 = 0.3333...(with infinite 3's)
...
9/9 = 0.9999...(with infinite 9's)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 34 times

by krusta80 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:12 pm
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:
krusta80 wrote: The interesting thing about infinite 9's as a decimal is that it has no equivalent fraction. :)
I'm not sure I agree with that.

We know that 1/9 = 0.1111...(with infinite 1's)
And 2/9 = 0.2222...(with infinite 2's)
And 3/9 = 0.3333...(with infinite 3's)
...
9/9 = 0.9999...(with infinite 9's)

Cheers,
Brent
But we know that 9/9 is 1. :)

Actually...looks like we're both right...unless of course Wiki is wrong. lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999...
Last edited by krusta80 on Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:12 pm
vikram4689 wrote:Haha, but we are talking about 0.4999999 and not 0.4999999....infinity.
and 0.4999999 is NOT equal to 0.5 so if we have to answer "0.4999999 to integer?" then it would be 0
Agreed, but I've been responding to the second part of the original question, that asks what happens if the 9's are repeating.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1325
Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:24 amFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 105 times

by vikram4689 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:15 pm
this is what Brent was saying i.e. 0.999... = 1
But we know that 9/9 is 1.
I think we should not delve more as we all agree
0.499999 to integer is 0
0.4999... to integer is 1
Premise: If you like my post
Conclusion : Press the Thanks Button ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:13 amFollowed by: 5 members
Thanked: 34 times

by krusta80 » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:17 pm
vikram4689 wrote:this is what Brent was saying i.e. 0.999... = 1
But we know that 9/9 is 1.
I think we should not delve more as we all agree
0.499999 to integer is 0
0.4999... to integer is 1
Agreed.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pmFollowed by: 1268 members
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Mar 03, 2012 11:23 pm
It looks like it's unanimous!

Now I can go to bed.... :-)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 10:04 pm

by rakesh4u119 » Mon Apr 02, 2012 3:18 am
Try below Funda's..

Pure Recurring to Fractions
FUNDA 1: If a number is of the form of 0.ababab....... then divide the repeating digits with as many 9's as we have repeated digits.
eg. 0.363636... =36/99 =11/4

Mixed Recurring to Fractions

FUNDA 2: If N = 0.abcbcbc.... Then
N =(abc − a)/990
As many 9' s as repeated digits followed by as many zero as non repeated digits
Re peated & non repeated digits Non repeated digits
−
−
eg. 0.25757.....=(257 − 2)/990=255/990 =17/66

FUNDA 3:If N = a.bcbc.... Then
Write N = a + 0.bcbc....
Proceed as Funda 1
5.3636... = 5 + 0.3636... =5 + 36/99 = 11/59
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1