Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

ROOTS and CUBES

Expert replies
by logitech » Fri Nov 28, 2008 1:28 am
Is x > y?

(1) x^(1/2) > y

(2) x^3 > y
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:10 am
IMO C

From 1 we have x^1/2 > y
if x = 4, y=1 x^1/2 > y but if we have x=1/4, y=1/3
we have x^1/2>y but x<y hence insuff.
eliminate A,D

From 2 we have x^3>y
x=2, y=1 x^3>y and x>y but if x=2, y=3 x^3>y and x<y
Hence insuff.
Eliminate B

Combining both
we have x^1/2 > y and x^3>y, which is only possible if x>y.
Hence suff.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:33 pm
Hi Jimmiejaz,
can u pls explain how to arrived that C is sufficient. I cant picturize it.

thanks
-V
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:56 pm
Lemme try this:

From I:

x^1/2 >y => x> y^2. Try positive negative and fraction values and the equation falls apart. - Not sufficient. - Eliminate A, D

From II:

x^1/3 >y => x> y^3 , Try positive and negative values and the equation falls apart. Eliminate B

Together : x> y^2 and x > y^3 => x> y Sufficient.

Hope I haven't gone wrong anywhere.
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:22 am
jimmiejaz wrote:IMO C

From 1 we have x^1/2 > y
if x = 4, y=1 x^1/2 > y but if we have x=1/4, y=1/3
we have x^1/2>y but x<y hence insuff.
eliminate A,D

From 2 we have x^3>y
x=2, y=1 x^3>y and x>y but if x=2, y=3 x^3>y and x<y
Hence insuff.
Eliminate B

Combining both
we have x^1/2 > y and x^3>y, which is only possible if x>y.
Hence suff.
Correct me if I'm wrong here:

If you add both statements, you will get:
x^1/2 + x^3 > 2y

If x = 2, y = 1, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(1) and x > y
If x = 2, y = 3, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(3) but x < y. (So insufficient)

Answer E?

-BM-
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:58 am
Statement I & II insufficient alone.

Combining I & II

if x is a positive integer
x^3 > x > sqrtx

if sqrt x is greater than y, x will also be greater than y.


if x is negative, we cannot have this case because sqrt x cannot be negative.


if x is less than 1 and greater than 0
sqrtx > x > x^3

if x^3 is greater than y, then x will certainly be greater than y.

Sufficient.

Hence C.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you still have any doubts.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:12 am
parallel_chase wrote:Statement I & II insufficient alone.

Combining I & II

if x is a positive integer
x^3 > x > sqrtx

if sqrt x is greater than y, x will also be greater than y.


if x is negative, we cannot have this case because sqrt x cannot be negative.


if x is less than 1 and greater than 0
sqrtx > x > x^3

if x^3 is greater than y, then x will certainly be greater than y.

Sufficient.

Hence C.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you still have any doubts.
Chase, thats one great solution!! Thanks.

But could you tell me why can't I see that with my approach (i.e. by adding both statements)?

-BM-
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:08 am
bluementor wrote: If you add both statements, you will get:
x^1/2 + x^3 > 2y

If x = 2, y = 1, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(1) and x > y
If x = 2, y = 3, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(3) but x < y. (So insufficient)

Answer E?

-BM-
I dont know why you added both the statements, you treat them as seperate
statements.

The first case is perfect. i.e. x = 2, y = 1

The second case, x = 2, y = 3 , actually contradicts one of the statement

x^3 > y => 2^3 > 3

sqrtx > y => sqrt2 > 3 [this case contradicts the first statement]

Therefore, there shouldnt be any such case.

Hope this helps
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion