BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

ROOTS and CUBES

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jimmiejaz » Fri Nov 28, 2008 5:10 am
IMO C

From 1 we have x^1/2 > y
if x = 4, y=1 x^1/2 > y but if we have x=1/4, y=1/3
we have x^1/2>y but x<y hence insuff.
eliminate A,D

From 2 we have x^3>y
x=2, y=1 x^3>y and x>y but if x=2, y=3 x^3>y and x<y
Hence insuff.
Eliminate B

Combining both
we have x^1/2 > y and x^3>y, which is only possible if x>y.
Hence suff.
What if i have not yet beat the beast, I know i will beat it!!!!!!!!
Join the discussion

by vittalgmat » Fri Nov 28, 2008 11:33 pm
Hi Jimmiejaz,
can u pls explain how to arrived that C is sufficient. I cant picturize it.

thanks
-V
Join the discussion

by pbanavara » Mon Dec 01, 2008 10:56 pm
Lemme try this:

From I:

x^1/2 >y => x> y^2. Try positive negative and fraction values and the equation falls apart. - Not sufficient. - Eliminate A, D

From II:

x^1/3 >y => x> y^3 , Try positive and negative values and the equation falls apart. Eliminate B

Together : x> y^2 and x > y^3 => x> y Sufficient.

Hope I haven't gone wrong anywhere.
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:22 am
jimmiejaz wrote:IMO C

From 1 we have x^1/2 > y
if x = 4, y=1 x^1/2 > y but if we have x=1/4, y=1/3
we have x^1/2>y but x<y hence insuff.
eliminate A,D

From 2 we have x^3>y
x=2, y=1 x^3>y and x>y but if x=2, y=3 x^3>y and x<y
Hence insuff.
Eliminate B

Combining both
we have x^1/2 > y and x^3>y, which is only possible if x>y.
Hence suff.
Correct me if I'm wrong here:

If you add both statements, you will get:
x^1/2 + x^3 > 2y

If x = 2, y = 1, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(1) and x > y
If x = 2, y = 3, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(3) but x < y. (So insufficient)

Answer E?

-BM-
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Tue Dec 02, 2008 2:58 am
Statement I & II insufficient alone.

Combining I & II

if x is a positive integer
x^3 > x > sqrtx

if sqrt x is greater than y, x will also be greater than y.


if x is negative, we cannot have this case because sqrt x cannot be negative.


if x is less than 1 and greater than 0
sqrtx > x > x^3

if x^3 is greater than y, then x will certainly be greater than y.

Sufficient.

Hence C.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you still have any doubts.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Tue Dec 02, 2008 3:12 am
parallel_chase wrote:Statement I & II insufficient alone.

Combining I & II

if x is a positive integer
x^3 > x > sqrtx

if sqrt x is greater than y, x will also be greater than y.


if x is negative, we cannot have this case because sqrt x cannot be negative.


if x is less than 1 and greater than 0
sqrtx > x > x^3

if x^3 is greater than y, then x will certainly be greater than y.

Sufficient.

Hence C.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you still have any doubts.
Chase, thats one great solution!! Thanks.

But could you tell me why can't I see that with my approach (i.e. by adding both statements)?

-BM-
Join the discussion

by parallel_chase » Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:08 am
bluementor wrote: If you add both statements, you will get:
x^1/2 + x^3 > 2y

If x = 2, y = 1, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(1) and x > y
If x = 2, y = 3, (2)^1/2 + (2)^3 > 2(3) but x < y. (So insufficient)

Answer E?

-BM-
I dont know why you added both the statements, you treat them as seperate
statements.

The first case is perfect. i.e. x = 2, y = 1

The second case, x = 2, y = 3 , actually contradicts one of the statement

x^3 > y => 2^3 > 3

sqrtx > y => sqrt2 > 3 [this case contradicts the first statement]

Therefore, there shouldnt be any such case.

Hope this helps
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion