Number/Numbers

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 88
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 1:20 am
Thanked: 1 times

Number/Numbers

by Onell » Wed Nov 16, 2011 10:57 pm
1.Having more than the usual number of fingers or toes on the hands or feet is termed polydactyly. --MGMT
2.New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. -TEST PAPERS
3A Labor Department study states that the number of women employed outside the home increased by more than thirty-five percent in the past decade and accounted for more than sixty-two percent of the total growth in the civilian work force. --OG
4.The gryfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. --OG

All above are the correct sentences either from OG or some other reputed sources.In first and 3rd sentences NUMBERS is used whereas in 2 nd and 4th "NUMBER " is used. Can someone highlight the important differences between Number vs Numbers? when to choose one over another?

Thank you
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Thu Nov 17, 2011 1:36 am
Onell wrote:1.Having more than the usual number of fingers or toes on the hands or feet is termed polydactyly. --MGMT
2.New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. -TEST PAPERS
3A Labor Department study states that the number of women employed outside the home increased by more than thirty-five percent in the past decade and accounted for more than sixty-two percent of the total growth in the civilian work force. --OG
4.The gryfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. --OG

It has to co-exist with the verb

All above are the correct sentences either from OG or some other reputed sources.In first and 3rd sentences NUMBERS is used whereas in 2 nd and 4th "NUMBER " is used. Can someone highlight the important differences between Number vs Numbers? when to choose one over another?

Thank you

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun May 29, 2011 5:10 am
Location: Vietnam
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:5 members

by tuanquang269 » Thu Nov 17, 2011 7:22 am
The numbers of or A numbers of is always wrong.

Your example above:
2.New Jersey has one of the five highest numbers of reported cases of Lyme disease in the United States. -TEST PAPERS

4.The gryfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's. --OG

Be aware with some words follow numbers.

You can see more from this thread: https://www.beatthegmat.com/numbers-of-i ... 39059.html

Hey guys

So, technically "THE numbers of" or "A numbers of" is wrong - that whole thing, including the article in front, not just "numbers of." You can have "numbers of" without those articles, as in the example at the top of the thread.

(You can also, technically, have "the numbers of" if you are literally talking about multiple numbers - eg, two players have the numbers 7 and 13 on their jerseys, and I say "the numbers of the jerseys are 7 and 13." But that kind of set-up would be very unusual on this test.)

Also, remember that there's almost always an obscure exception to any rule you can think of. Annoying, but true. ("Being" is not always wrong either - it's just almost always wrong on the GMAT.) Because of the frequent, obscure exceptions, we should mostly just worry about the most likely / primary rules. Otherwise, we'll drive ourselves crazy. - from Stacey Instructor
Hope that helps

• Page 1 of 1