Only a 25% fare increase for the Jefferson Tunnel into Gotha

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:13 am

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Only a 25% fare increase for the Jefferson Tunnel into Gotham city will allow the traffic that is so congested there to be alleviated. The Washington Tunnel (just 2 miles north) going into Gotham city, would, if expanded to 4 lanes, be an attractive alternative for fully 30% of inbound traffic. Nevertheless, experts reject the claim that expanding the Washington Tunnel into a 4-lane tunnel would end the traffic congestion in the Jefferson Tunnel.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to justify experts' position?
(A)
Expanding the Washington Tunnel to a 4-lane tunnel would require not only substantial construction at the tunnel itself, but also the construction of new expanded highways going into and exiting the tunnels.
(B)
A second largely undeveloped tunnel close to Jefferson Tunnel would be a more attractive alternative than Washington Tunnel for many passengers who now use the Jefferson Tunnel.
(C)
The Washington Tunnel lies in a relatively undeveloped area but would, if it became a 4-lane tunnel with higher traffic, the surrounding area near the tunnel would be a magnet for commercial and residential development.
(D)
If the average car or truck has to wait 30-40 minutes to pass through the tunnel, the chance for cars to run out of fuel and cause emergency breakdowns adds significantly to the risks of operating a congested tunnel.

(E)
More than sixty percent of cars entering through the Jefferson tunnel continue on to a connecting bridge, only accessible via the Jefferson Tunnel, to reach their final destination on Goliath Island.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
Followed by:5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Oct 14, 2018 12:07 pm

Timer

00:00

Your Answer

A

B

C

D

E

Global Stats

Option A - CORRECT.
This option best justify the expert position. Since only a 25% fare increase for the Jefferson Tunnel into Gotham city will allow the traffic that is so congested there to be alleviated, then there would be no need for an additional 2 miles north journey before getting into Gotham city. However, it will be unwise to incur more cost by expanding the Washington Tunnel to a 4-lane tunnel which would require not only substantial construction at the tunnel itself, but also the construction of new expanded highways going into and exiting the tunnels.

Option B - INCORRECT.
This option can also be an alternative to the experts position if the second largely undeveloped tunnel close to Jefferson Tunnel would be less expensive to reconstruct than the Washington Tunnel, and also would be an attractive alternative than Washington Tunnel for many passengers who now use the Jefferson Tunnel.

Option C - INCORRECT.
The location of the Washington Tunnel is not the basic reason for the experts opposition, but rather the cost of developing the 4-lane tunnel and the difference in distance to Gotham city is of concern.

Option D - INCORRECT.
This also is option is also of upmost concern but not really the main reason for the opposition by the expert.

Option E - INCORRECT.
The claim that more than sixty percent of cars entering through the Jefferson tunnel continue on to a connecting bridge, only accessible via the Jefferson Tunnel, to reach their final destination on Goliath Island is also a reason to oppose the argument.