BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Prove embarrassing

Expert replies
by [email protected] » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:20 pm
With so much public scrutiny of politicians' private lives, many aspiring lawmakers are dissuaded from seeking office because the exposing of their past indiscretions to the public would prove embarrassing
A.
B. of past indiscretions exposed to the public proving embarrassing
C. past indiscretions, if they were exposed to the public, would prove to be embarrassing
D. their past indiscretions would prove embarrassing if exposed to the public
E. it would prove embarrassing if their past indiscretions had been exposed to the public

Would anyone explain why OA- [spoiler][D][/spoiler] beats my choice [spoiler][C][/spoiler]? Thanks
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by jyotiistalking » Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:41 pm
They in option c can refer to 2 things, hence i chose option D.
Join the discussion

by Karen » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:20 pm
jyotiistalking, I agree with you that 'they' in C is ambiguous. Also C only refers to "past indiscretions" without making clear that the issue is *their* past indiscretions -- they could be anybody's past indiscretions. And D just sounds tighter and smoother. It has a better rhythm, and "prove embarrassing" doesn't have the unnecessary "to be".
Karen van Hoek, PhD
Verbal Specialist

Test Prep New York
maximize your score, minimize your stress
www.testprepny.com
[email protected]
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1