BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Remo CR

Expert replies
by aj5105 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:25 pm
Unprecedented industrial growth in the country of Remo has created serious environmental problems because factories there lack adequate pollution-control systems. Remo is developing a clean growth plan that includes environmental regulations that will require the installation of such systems. Since no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems, the plan, if implemented, will create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.

B.Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.

C.Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.

D.The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.

E.Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by rahulg83 » Sat May 30, 2009 9:37 pm
IMO A

The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.

If the plan suits well for manufacturers in terms of tax-incentives, they will be keen to develop pollution control systems themselves rather than exporting these systems from foreign exporters.
Join the discussion

by cramya » Sat May 30, 2009 10:10 pm
Conclusion: new plan implemented-> create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems

A.The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.

Clearly weakens the argument (analagous to alternate cause for the sated effect). This would mean that significant opportunities for foreign exporters may not exist since local companies may provide the needful

B.Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.

So what this would mean foreign exporters are getting significant oppurtunities which would strengthen the argument definitely not weaken

C.Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.

Good luck to them.. still doesnt address or weakens the conclusion significant opportunities for foreign exporters exists

D.The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.

ok.. Good to know but really out of scope

E.Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.

That's sad...but it does nothing to weaken the argument i.e. does not show that significant opportunities for foreign exporters does not exist

Hands down A
Join the discussion

Re: Remo CR

by amazonviper » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:29 pm
aj5105 wrote:Unprecedented industrial growth in the country of Remo has created serious environmental problems because factories there lack adequate pollution-control systems. Remo is developing a clean growth plan that includes environmental regulations that will require the installation of such systems. Since no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems, the plan, if implemented, will create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.

B.Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.

C.Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.

D.The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.

E.Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.
IMO definitely A.

We can use POE to get down to choose between A and C since they are two possible sensible choices. But A seems to negate it seriously and contents of C are not necessarily included in the argument.
Join the discussion

Re: Remo CR

by dtweah » Mon Jun 01, 2009 12:37 pm
amazonviper wrote:
aj5105 wrote:Unprecedented industrial growth in the country of Remo has created serious environmental problems because factories there lack adequate pollution-control systems. Remo is developing a clean growth plan that includes environmental regulations that will require the installation of such systems. Since no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems, the plan, if implemented, will create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.

B.Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.

C.Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.

D.The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.

E.Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.
IMO definitely A.

We can use POE to get down to choose between A and C since they are two possible sensible choices. But A seems to negate it seriously and contents of C are not necessarily included in the argument.
C is not even close. It says nothing about " Pollution-Control systems" which is probably the most overused phrase in the passage. YOu have to check answer choices for these clues. If the argument is about pollution control systems, the answer choice will use that phrase not imply it or bury it under some general phrase or idea. You can use this technique to eliminate wrong answers in more difficult questions.
Join the discussion

by mehravikas » Mon Jun 01, 2009 1:49 pm
IMO - A
Join the discussion

Re: Remo CR

by amazonviper » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:54 pm
dtweah wrote:
amazonviper wrote:
aj5105 wrote:Unprecedented industrial growth in the country of Remo has created serious environmental problems because factories there lack adequate pollution-control systems. Remo is developing a clean growth plan that includes environmental regulations that will require the installation of such systems. Since no companies in Remo currently produce pollution-control systems, the plan, if implemented, will create significant opportunities for foreign exporters to market pollution-control systems.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.The clean growth plan will provide tax incentives for local businesses to develop and manufacture pollution-control devices.

B.Foreign exporters would provide factory-trained technicians to maintain the pollution-control systems sold to Remo.

C.Industrial lobbyists sponsored by local businesses in Remo are trying to prevent the implementation of the government regulations.

D.The regulations that Remo plans to implement are much less strict than those in neighboring nations.

E.Pollution in Remo has caused serious health problems for workers, contributing to a significant increase in the number of workdays lost to illness.
IMO definitely A.

We can use POE to get down to choose between A and C since they are two possible sensible choices. But A seems to negate it seriously and contents of C are not necessarily included in the argument.
C is not even close. It says nothing about " Pollution-Control systems" which is probably the most overused phrase in the passage. YOu have to check answer choices for these clues. If the argument is about pollution control systems, the answer choice will use that phrase not imply it or bury it under some general phrase or idea. You can use this technique to eliminate wrong answers in more difficult questions.
You are correct. C is indeed not close. I guess I assumed a bit there. Thanks for the tip!!. :-)
Join the discussion

by sudeep_ar » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:56 am
Definitely A
Join the discussion

by nicolette » Sun May 15, 2016 2:42 pm
It seems to me that the right answer is A
Join the discussion