Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Reclaimation of land

Expert replies
by rookiez » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:52 am
Can someone explain the line of reasoning and answer? I am completely stumped.

Q2:
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?
A. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, coal mines in Balzania continued to be less expensive to operate than coal mines in almost any other country.
B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.

D. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than underground mines.
E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in Balzania today comes from surface mines.

QA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:24 am
to explain why reclamation costs fell

A. comparison with any other country is out of scope.

B. decline in the use of coal doesnt explain why reclamation costs fell. if anything, coal costs prices may have fallen. no information about reclamation costs

C. by POE. now coal is no longer surface mined at mountainous regions where reclamation costs are high=> coal is now mined at regions where reclamation costs are low. explains the fall in reclamation costs.

D. coal production costs are out of scope

E. greater % of coal coming from surface mines does not explain why reclamation costs fell.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:56 am
scoobydooby wrote:to explain why reclamation costs fell

A. comparison with any other country is out of scope.

B. decline in the use of coal doesnt explain why reclamation costs fell. if anything, coal costs prices may have fallen. no information about reclamation costs

C. by POE. now coal is no longer surface mined at mountainous regions where reclamation costs are high=> coal is now mined at regions where reclamation costs are low. explains the fall in reclamation costs.

D. coal production costs are out of scope

E. greater % of coal coming from surface mines does not explain why reclamation costs fell.
Awesome scooby !!!

My line of reasoning was confirmed after reading your post.
Join the discussion

by vikram_k51 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:03 am
Will go with B.It explains why the cost of reclamation has decreased.
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:08 am
Hmm..understood why C is the correct answer but could somebody please please explain B?
If the use of coal has declined then the coal prioces have decreased..which means that reclamation costs will also go down..:(
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:47 am
vikram_k51 wrote:Will go with B.It explains why the cost of reclamation has decreased.
@Vikram, Even me too initially buzzed for B.

let me unwind the entanglements :

Option B says that "Only use of Coal as a fuel has declined." It not " Necessarily" means that the coal that the mine produced has declined .There could have been some there source of fuel would have popped up in the twenty years gap.

Secondly..Reclamation costs are chartered only by the amount of coal PRODUCED by the mine and not by any other factor( inclusive of its usage as quoted by B).

On that Note Option C hints that to maintain the same profit margin ,one way is to lower your reclamation costs.so people have ceased mining in mountainous area.
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Looking at it now, B makes sense
Join the discussion