BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Reclaimation of land

Expert replies
by rookiez » Fri Jul 17, 2009 9:52 am
Can someone explain the line of reasoning and answer? I am completely stumped.

Q2:
Twenty years ago, Balzania put in place regulations requiring operators of surface mines to pay for the reclamation of mined-out land. Since then, reclamation technology has not improved. Yet, the average reclamation cost for a surface coal mine being reclaimed today is only four dollars per ton of coal that the mine produced, less than half what it cost to reclaim surface mines in the years immediately after the regulations took effect.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to account for the drop in reclamation costs described?
A. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, coal mines in Balzania continued to be less expensive to operate than coal mines in almost any other country.
B. In the twenty years since the regulations took effect, the use of coal as a fuel has declined from the level it was at in the previous twenty years.
C. Mine operators have generally ceased surface mining in the mountainous areas of Balzania because reclamation costs per ton of coal produced are particularly high for mines in such areas.

D. Even after Balzania began requiring surface mine operators to pay reclamation costs, surface mines continued to produce coal at a lower total cost than underground mines.
E. As compared to twenty years ago, a greater percentage of the coal mined in Balzania today comes from surface mines.

QA C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by scoobydooby » Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:24 am
to explain why reclamation costs fell

A. comparison with any other country is out of scope.

B. decline in the use of coal doesnt explain why reclamation costs fell. if anything, coal costs prices may have fallen. no information about reclamation costs

C. by POE. now coal is no longer surface mined at mountainous regions where reclamation costs are high=> coal is now mined at regions where reclamation costs are low. explains the fall in reclamation costs.

D. coal production costs are out of scope

E. greater % of coal coming from surface mines does not explain why reclamation costs fell.
Join the discussion

by goelmohit2002 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 8:56 am
scoobydooby wrote:to explain why reclamation costs fell

A. comparison with any other country is out of scope.

B. decline in the use of coal doesnt explain why reclamation costs fell. if anything, coal costs prices may have fallen. no information about reclamation costs

C. by POE. now coal is no longer surface mined at mountainous regions where reclamation costs are high=> coal is now mined at regions where reclamation costs are low. explains the fall in reclamation costs.

D. coal production costs are out of scope

E. greater % of coal coming from surface mines does not explain why reclamation costs fell.
Awesome scooby !!!

My line of reasoning was confirmed after reading your post.
Join the discussion

by vikram_k51 » Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:03 am
Will go with B.It explains why the cost of reclamation has decreased.
Join the discussion

by uptowngirl92 » Mon Oct 26, 2009 3:08 am
Hmm..understood why C is the correct answer but could somebody please please explain B?
If the use of coal has declined then the coal prioces have decreased..which means that reclamation costs will also go down..:(
Join the discussion

by gmatmachoman » Mon Oct 26, 2009 7:47 am
vikram_k51 wrote:Will go with B.It explains why the cost of reclamation has decreased.
@Vikram, Even me too initially buzzed for B.

let me unwind the entanglements :

Option B says that "Only use of Coal as a fuel has declined." It not " Necessarily" means that the coal that the mine produced has declined .There could have been some there source of fuel would have popped up in the twenty years gap.

Secondly..Reclamation costs are chartered only by the amount of coal PRODUCED by the mine and not by any other factor( inclusive of its usage as quoted by B).

On that Note Option C hints that to maintain the same profit margin ,one way is to lower your reclamation costs.so people have ceased mining in mountainous area.
Join the discussion

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Looking at it now, B makes sense
Join the discussion