BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATBootcamp Starts Sep 21
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE BOOTCAMP

Live Online Bootcamp Class with Top GMAT Expert Chris Peckover

Sep 21 to Oct 9, 2026

Schedule
Mon to Fri · 7:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
Live classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class
  • 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included
View bootcamp & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions
Start free 5-day trial
Read 559 reviewsTarget Test Prep

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous us

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pmFollowed by: 23 members
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:37 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous use longer than 7 consecutive days. While some people might be able to safely use a particular pain reliever for a longer period of time, many people will begin to experience side effects if the warnings are ignored.

The information above most strongly supports which of the following?

(A) A physician should not advise any patient to take any pain reliever for a period of longer than 7 consecutive days.

(B) People who are sensitive to one type of pain reliever should not attempt to use a different pain reliever.

(C) At least some people who take pain relievers for longer than 7 days will experience side effects.

(D) Any side effects experienced by a patient who has taken a pain reliever for fewer than 7 consecutive days cannot be the result of the pain reliever.

(E) Anyone who wants to maximize their natural health and well-being should avoid pain relievers entirely.

OA C

Source: Veritas Prep
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:17 am
We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.

Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive

Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.

Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.

Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.

Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.

Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:18 am
We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.

Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive

Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.

Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.

Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.

Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.

Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1