BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous us

Expert replies
Post new topic Post Reply
Previous Topic Next Topic
Moderator
Posts: 7187
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pmFollowed by: 23 members
by BTGmoderatorDC » Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:37 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

A

B

C

D

E

Stats

Difficulty—

Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous use longer than 7 consecutive days. While some people might be able to safely use a particular pain reliever for a longer period of time, many people will begin to experience side effects if the warnings are ignored.

The information above most strongly supports which of the following?

(A) A physician should not advise any patient to take any pain reliever for a period of longer than 7 consecutive days.

(B) People who are sensitive to one type of pain reliever should not attempt to use a different pain reliever.

(C) At least some people who take pain relievers for longer than 7 days will experience side effects.

(D) Any side effects experienced by a patient who has taken a pain reliever for fewer than 7 consecutive days cannot be the result of the pain reliever.

(E) Anyone who wants to maximize their natural health and well-being should avoid pain relievers entirely.

OA C

Source: Veritas Prep
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Critical Reasoning |
Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:17 am
We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.

Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive

Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.

Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.

Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.

Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.

Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 2214
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:18 am
We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.

Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive

Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.

Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.

Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.

Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.

Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Post Reply
• Page 1 of 1