Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous use longer than 7 consecutive days. While some people might be able to safely use a particular pain reliever for a longer period of time, many people will begin to experience side effects if the warnings are ignored.
The information above most strongly supports which of the following?
(A) A physician should not advise any patient to take any pain reliever for a period of longer than 7 consecutive days.
(B) People who are sensitive to one type of pain reliever should not attempt to use a different pain reliever.
(C) At least some people who take pain relievers for longer than 7 days will experience side effects.
(D) Any side effects experienced by a patient who has taken a pain reliever for fewer than 7 consecutive days cannot be the result of the pain reliever.
(E) Anyone who wants to maximize their natural health and well-being should avoid pain relievers entirely.
OA C
Source: Veritas Prep
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous us
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorDC
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.
Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive
Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.
Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.
Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.
Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.
Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive
Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.
Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.
Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.
Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.
Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.
Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive
Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.
Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.
Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.
Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.
Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive
Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.
Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.
Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.
Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.
Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.
