Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous us

Expert replies

Previous Topic Next Topic

BTGmoderatorDC: Moderator; Posts: 7187; Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pmFollowed by: 23 members

by BTGmoderatorDC » Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:37 pm

Timer

00:00

Answers

Stats

Difficulty—

Most pain relievers come with warnings against continuous use longer than 7 consecutive days. While some people might be able to safely use a particular pain reliever for a longer period of time, many people will begin to experience side effects if the warnings are ignored.

The information above most strongly supports which of the following?

(A) A physician should not advise any patient to take any pain reliever for a period of longer than 7 consecutive days.

(B) People who are sensitive to one type of pain reliever should not attempt to use a different pain reliever.

(C) At least some people who take pain relievers for longer than 7 days will experience side effects.

(D) Any side effects experienced by a patient who has taken a pain reliever for fewer than 7 consecutive days cannot be the result of the pain reliever.

(E) Anyone who wants to maximize their natural health and well-being should avoid pain relievers entirely.

OA C

Source: Veritas Prep

Source: Beat The GMAT — Critical Reasoning | Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:37 pm

deloitte247: Legendary Member; Posts: 2214; Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:17 am

We need to find what is in in line with the information given and doesn't oppose the claim in the argument.

Premise:- most pain relievers come with warning against continuous use longer than three consecutive

Option A:- Incorrect Option
This is contrary to to the believe of the argument. It opposes the argument. It opposes the argument by claiming that opposite of the information given.

Option B:- Incorrect Option
The information is not about people who are sensitive to a type of pain reliever. This is outside the scope of the argument.

Option C:- correct Option
True. The information given informs us on how some people who use pain relievers for more than 7 days consecutively may experience side effects if they ignore the warnings given.

Option D:- Incorrect Option
The information given in the argument does not exactly appeal to this claim. There is no indication or evidence to back us this claim.

Option E:- Incorrect Option
The information given does not oppose the use of pain relievers as the claim does.

deloitte247: Legendary Member; Posts: 2214; Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pmFollowed by: 5 members

by deloitte247 » Sun Jul 28, 2019 8:18 am

GMAT Course Reviews

563 reviews

1168 reviews

431 reviews

359 reviews

147 reviews

5/5

5 Star (563 Reviews)

"Target Test Prep is the closest to the official version of the GMAT exam, about 99% accuracy in terms of the quality and quantity of information. The course has excellently created singular sets of focused lessons and tests for every possible topic that one could come across in the official GMAT exam."

"The TTP course maximizes the efficiency of the time you spend studying. It will take time and effort but I could almost guarantee that if you complete the course exactly as it is laid out you will get an amazing score. They also have a very responsive team willing to help with any questions you might have."

"TTP has two things that I think no other test prep company offers: A teaching approach that reinforces understanding and an attitude that will give you the mental preparedness needed to succeed on the test. TTP gives you a deep understanding of the concept you need to know while teaching you how to think."

Write a Review