For better or for worse, race places a very large part in people's
perception of others in the world and in their own society. The notion of
one's own race often influences the actions and interests of an individual
(either towards or away from activities typically associated with a group)
and, in many cases, the perception of another individual's race influences
the perceiver's actions toward that individual. Races are inaccurate as
biological categories. The existence of racism, and the genesis of our
racial taxonomies themselves in the history of colonialism and slavery,
argue for abandoning racial categories altogether.
Few would deny the importance of racial categories in our everyday
lives, nor the social problems and conflict race has caused. Less well
known are the scientific problems with race: racial categories cannot be
reconciled with what scientists know about human biological diversity.
Biological races are branches of a species that have been unable to
reproduce with each other for a significant period of time. Their
separation may be due to geographic or other barriers, but anatomically,
members of different races can interbreed, since they are of the same
species.
Breeds of domesticated dogs are an example of races cultivated by
humans. In contrast, human groups have interbred for our entire history
as a species, and none have been isolated long enough to be considered
true races. The American racial classification system is no more
scientifically valid than are other racial taxonomies, local conceptions of
race affirmed in other societies or countries. Racial taxonomies in
different countries are not biological races, but rather what anthropologist
Charles Wagley calls "•social races.
Racial classification presupposes that people with certain phenotypes
share a common recent ancestry that others do not share. However,
physical traits are not a reliable indicator of recent shared descent. There
are no sharp borders between human groups, as there are between socalled
races, because physical traits change gradually. Anatomical
features in human populations represent adaptations to evolutionary
forces: skin colour is an adaptation to latitude, facial shape to climate or
altitude, and blood type to endemic diseases. Any particular trait is
shared by groups of people of varied heritages, people who adapted to
similar conditions in different parts of the world. Since different features
do not vary together, no assortment of traits can accurately delineate any
group as a true race.
If race were biological, different societies would understand race in
similar ways. In fact, societies use widely varying criteria to determine
race. Nor are these criteria all internally consistent. Although most
Americans believe that appearance or genetics form the basis of race, in
the United States, a person's race, legally, is determined by his ancestry,
the race of his parents. Further, some state laws, legacies of slavery,
place biracial individuals into the race of the minority parent, without
regard to chromosomes or physical appearance. In Brazil, on the other
hand, people do not consider ancestry when identifying a person's race,
and there exist many more racial categories than in the US. Race in Brazilderives solely from appearance. One's race can change from day to day,
and may differ from the race of one's family, including that of full
siblings. The racial taxonomies in Brazil and the United States differ, but
neither one is based on scientific principles.
1. The passage cites Brazil as a country in which racial definitions have a
meaning that might not otherwise be readily apparent. The author suggests
that a person who is Brazilian might change his race by:
A. altering his birth certificate.
B. marrying a person of a different race.
C. having his DNA tested.
D. getting a sun tan.
E. surrendering his passport
2. The overall purpose of this passage is to:
A. present a hypothesis that may explain a recent discovery.
B. compare and contrast two methods of classification.
C. criticize the basis of a popular belief.
D. describe worldwide variations in a cultural phenomenon.
E. praise a widely accepted belief
3. The author of this passage would be most likely to agree with which of the
following statements about abandoning racial classification?
A. We can improve our society through conscious and concerted effort.
B. The United States' racial classification system should be replaced with
that of Brazil.
C. It would be disastrous for scientists to strip people of their valued
beliefs.
D. All beliefs that are not scientifically sound should be abandoned.
E. The society has reached the point of no return and nothing can be done
to change it
4. The author presents the example of racial classification in the United
States in the passage most probably in order to show that:
A. racial taxonomies may be logically inconsistent and widely
misunderstood.
B. the system of racial classification in North America is grounded in
scientific research.
C. individuals should be allowed to choose and to change their own racial
identification.
D. racial classifications are most accurate when they take all factors
(appearance , ancestry, and DNA) into account.
E. there is not enough being done by the authorities to control this
problem
OA [spoiler]DCAA It took me 5:40:98 to solve the passage with accuracy of 3 correct out of 4 . Is that bad ? I felt the passage easy , what you guys think , pour in your feedback and suggestions . Also the question-2 uses the word "crticize" isnt that word too extreme ? Waiting for replies
.[/spoiler]
