RC challenge - 6

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

RC challenge - 6

by abhasjha » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:24 am
Nearly every writer on the philosophy of civil rights activist Martin Luther King, Jr., makes a connection between King and Henry David Thoreau, usually via Thoreau’s famous essay, “Civil Disobedience” (1849). In his book Stride Toward Freedom (1958), King himself stated that Thoreau’s essay was his first intellectual contact with the theory of passive resistance to governmental laws that are perceived as morally unjust. However, this emphasis on Thoreau’s influence on King is unfortunate: first, King would not have agreed with many other aspects of Thoreau’s philosophy, including Thoreau’s ultimate acceptance of violence as a form of protest; second, an overemphasis on the influence of one essay has kept historians from noting other correspondences between King’s philosophy and transcendentalism . “Civil Disobedience” was the only example of transcendentalist writing with which King was familiar, and in many other transcendentalist writings, including works by Ralph Waldo Emerson and Margaret Fuller, King would have found ideas more nearly akin to his own.

The kind of civil disobedience King had in mind was, in fact, quite different from Thoreau’s view of civil disobedience Thoreau, like most other transcendentalists, was primarily interested in reform of the individual, whereas King was primarily interested in reform of society. As a protest against the Mexican War, Thoreau refused to pay taxes, but he did not hope by his action to force a change in national policy. While he encouraged others to adopt similar protests, he did not attempt to mount any mass protest action against unjust laws. In contrast to Thoreau, King began to advocate the use of mass civil disobedience to effect revolutionary changes within the social system.

However, King’s writings suggest that, without realizing it, he was an incipient transcendentalist. Most transcendentalists subscribed to the concept of “higher law” and included civil disobedience to unjust laws as part of their strategy. They often invoked the concept of higher law to justify their opposition to slavery and to advocate disobedience to the strengthened Fugitive Slave Law of 1850. In his second major book, King’s discussion of just and unjust laws and the responsibility of the individual is very similar to the transcendentalists’ discussion of higher law. In reference to how one can advocate breaking some laws and obeying others, King notes that there are two types of laws, just and unjust; he describes a just law as a “code that squares with the moral law ” and an unjust law as a “code that is out of harmony with the moral law.” Thus, King’s opposition to the injustice of legalized segregation in the twentieth century is philosophically akin to the transcendentalists’ opposition to the Fugitive Slave Law in the nineteenth century.

1. Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

(A) King’s philosophy was more influenced by Thoreau’s essay on civil disobedience than by any other writing of the transcendentalists.

(B) While historians may have overestimated Thoreau’s influence on King, King was greatly influenced by a number of the transcendentalist philosophers.

(C) Thoreau’s and King’s views on civil disobedience differed in that King was more concerned with the social reform than with the economic reform of society.

(D) Although historians have overemphasized Thoreau’s influence on King, there are parallels between King’s philosophy and transcendentalism that have not been fully appreciated.

(E) King’s ideas about law and civil disobedience were influenced by transcendentalism in general and Thoreau’s essays in particular.



2. Which one of the following statements about “Civil Disobedience” would the author consider most accurate?

(A) It was not King’s first contact with the concept of passive resistance to unjust laws.

(B) It was one of many examples of transcendentalist writing with which King was familiar.

(C) It provided King with a model for using passive resistance to effect social change.

(D) It contains a number of ideas with which other transcendentalists strongly disagreed.

(E) It influenced King’s philosophy on passive resistance to unjust laws.

3. In the first paragraph, the author is primarily concerned with

(A) chronicling the development of King’s philosophy on passive resistance to unjust law

(B) suggesting that a common emphasis on one influence on King’s philosophy has been misleading

(C) providing new information about the influence of twentieth-century philosophers on King’s work

(D) summarizing the work of historians of the most important influences on King’s philosophy

(E) providing background information about nineteenth-century transcendentalist philosophers


4. According to the passage, which one of the following is true of’ Emerson and Fuller?

(A) Some of their ideas were less typical of transcendentalism than were some of Thoreau’s ideas.

(B) They were more concerned with the reform of society than with the reform of the individual.

(C) They would have been more likely than Thoreau to agree with King on the necessity of mass protest in civil disobedience.

(D) Their ideas about civil disobedience and unjust laws are as well known as Thoreau’s are.

(E) Some of their ideas were more similar to King’s than were some of Thoreau’s.


5. According to the passage, King differed from most transcendentalists in that he

(A) opposed violence as a form of civil protest

(B) opposed war as an instrument of foreign policy under any circumstances

(C) believed that just laws had an inherent moral value

(D) was more interested in reforming society than in reforming the individual

(E) protested social and legal injustice in United States society rather than United States foreign policy


6. The passage suggests which one of the following about Thoreau?

(A) He was the first to develop fully the theory of civil disobedience.

(B) His work has had a greater influence on contemporary thinkers than has the work of Emerson and Fuller.

(C) His philosophy does not contain all of the same elements as the philosophies of the other transcendentalists.

(D) He advocated using civil disobedience to force the federal government to change its policies on war.

(E) He is better known for his ideas on social and legal reform than for his ideas on individual reform.


7. The passage provides support for which one of the following statements about the quotations in lines 52-55?

(A) They are an example of a way in which King’s ideas differed from Thoreau’s but were similar to the ideas of other transcendentalists.

(B) They provide evidence that proves that King’s philosophy was affected by transcendentalist thought.

(C) They suggest that King, like the transcendentalists, judged human laws by ethical standards.

(D) They suggest a theoretical basis for King’s philosophy of government.

(E) They provide a paraphrase of Thoreau’s position on just and unjust laws.
Source: — Reading Comprehension |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

by abhasjha » Wed Jul 29, 2009 4:27 am

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:57 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:720

by gmat_dest » Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:02 am
1. D
2. E
3. B
4. E
5. D
6. C

7. COuld not figure out line number 52-55.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 105
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:57 am
Thanked: 3 times

by abhi75 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 7:03 am
Here are my answers

1 - d
2 - e (Took some time to figure this out)
3 - b
4 - e
5 - d
6 - c
7 - didnt attempt this as there was no numbering of lines.

What is the OA ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

by abhasjha » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:51 pm
Topic and Scope: Martin Luther King’s civil rights philosophy; specifically, the
relationship between transcendentalism and King’s philosophy.
Purpose and Main Idea: Author re-evaluates the relationship between transcendentalist
ideas, especially Thoreau’s, and King’s civil rights philosophy. The passage’s main idea is
that past writers have overlooked philosophical differences between Thoreau’s and King’s
ideas, as well as similarities between other transcendentalists and King.
Paragraph Structure: ¶ 1 hinges on the Keyword “However” (line 9), which signals that
the author’s about to offer a new interpretation of the transcendentalist-King connection.
The Keywords “first” (line 11) and “second” (line 14) alert you to the author’s specific
points — (1) important differences exist between Thoreau’s and King’s philosophies and (2)
significant parallels exist between the beliefs of other transcendentalists and King.
Predictably, ¶ 2 and 3 take up these points. ¶ 2 contrasts the ideas of Thoreau and King, the
Keywords “In contrast” (lines 34-35) serving as a divider between them. ¶ 3 describes a
point of commonality between transcendentalists and King — the use of non-violent civil
disobedience to combat “unjust” laws.
The Big Picture:
• This passage is just the sort that you should tackle first. Why? Because topic, scope, and
author’s purpose are all revealed early, by line 11.
• Be on the lookout for passages that compare and contrast several points of view (as here:
Thoreau vs. King vs. other transcendentalists). Such passages always contain questions
that hinge on getting the gist of each different viewpoint.
The Questions:
1. (D)
(D) nicely paraphrases the points made by the author in lines 9-17. These points are then
explored in more detail in ¶’s 2 and 3.
(A) distorts a detail. Lines 17-20 say that Thoreau’s essay was the only transcendentalist
writing with which King was familiar. Moreover, this choice also distorts the main idea of
the passage — that King’s philosophy in many ways was more akin to that of
transcendentalists other than Thoreau.
(B) is a “half right, half wrong” choice. While the author does argue that historians have
overemphasized Thoreau’s influence on King, he never claims that King was influenced by
other transcendentalists. What he says is that parallels exist between their philosophy and
King’s.

(C)’s first few words sound okay — Thoreau and King did differ on civil disobedience —
but the final few hop the tracks. The difference between Thoreau and King wasn’t
economic vs. social, but rather individual vs. group and violent vs. non-violent.
(E) King was aware only of one transcendentalist tract, Thoreau’s essay “Civil
Disobedience.” Thus, he couldn’t have been influenced by Thoreau’s essays or by
transcendentalists in general .
• Wrong choices in LSAT “globals” are often wrong for very subtle reasons. Read the
choices carefully! Don’t endorse a choice simply because the first half sounds right, and
watch out for choices that use the passage’s language but misrepresent its ideas.



2. (E)
While the author feels that historians have overemphasized Thoreau’s influence on King,
he concedes that Thoreau’s essay “Civil Disobedience” did influence King’s philosophy to
some degree.
(A) and (B) are au contraire choices. (A) is refuted by lines 6-9, (B) by lines 17-20.
(C) According to the author, Thoreau endorsed the notion of violent resistance. Thus, the
author wouldn’t agree that “Civil Disobedience” provided a model for King’s notion of
passive resistance.
(D) is beyond the scope. The author discusses only King’s reaction to Thoreau’s essay, not
the reaction of transcendentalists in general.
• LSAT wrong choices are often written to formula. Classic wrong choice types are those
that directly contradict information in the text or go beyond the scope of the text.


3. (B)
In the first ¶, the author makes two points: (1) Thoreau has been given too much credit for
shaping King’s ideas and (2) this overemphasis has obscured parallels between the ideas of
other transcendentalists and King. (B) is an abstract way of saying the same thing.
(A) would be correct if the question had asked about ¶ 3, not ¶ 1.
(C) is beyond the scope. The passage never even mentions any 20th-century philosophers,
let alone their possible impact on King.
(D) distorts the thrust of ¶ 1. The author criticizes historians for overemphasizing
Thoreau’s impact on King, but he never summarizes their work “on the most important
influences” on King.
(E) is also beyond the scope. Although transcendentalist philsophers like Thoreau,
Emerson, and Fuller are talked about in relation to King’s philosophy, the author doesn’t
provide any “background information” on them or other 19th-century transcendentalists

4. (E)
Lines 14-23 make precisely the same point.
(A) is beyond the scope. Thoreau’s ideas are never compared to those of Emerson and
Fuller in terms of their correspondence to general transcendentalist ideas.
(B) wrongly plays on information pertaining to Thoreau and King. Thoreau was more
concerned with individuals, while King was more concerned with society. That’s in lines
26-29. Besides, most transcendentalists were apparently more concerned with individuals
than with society. Although the passage doesn’t say so for sure, Emerson and Fuller
probably subscribed to this notion.
(C) While the passage says that the ideas of Emerson, Fuller, and King were “akin” in some
ways, it doesn’t say specifically in what ways. If anything, Emerson and Fuller, given their
likely emphasis on the individual, would probably have been no more enthusiastic than
Thoreau about mass protests.
(D), like (A), is beyond the scope. The passage never discusses whether Emerson and
Fuller’s ideas have achieved as much notoriety as those of Thoreau.
• Never answer explicit-text questions on a hunch or a vague recollection of the text. Go
back and reread the relevant piece(s) of text! The answer to explicit-text questions is
always in the passage itself.



5. (D)
If you looked up choice (B) in Q. 4, this question should have been a snap. Lines 26-29
explicitly state that King, in contrast to most transcendentalists, was out to reform society
instead of the individual.
(A) is beyond the scope. That Thoreau condoned violence certainly doesn’t mean that
transcendentalists in general approved of such methods. Thus, you can’t conclude that
King and transcendentalists in general were opposed on this point.
(B) and (E) are similarly beyond the scope. The passage never provides any clues about the
views or actions of either transcendentalists in general (though Thoreau was concerned
about foreign affairs) or King in the foreign policy sphere.
(C) Lines 45-49 make clear that (C) is a point of agreement between King and
transcendentalists.
• Your work on one question can often help you to choose the correct answer to another
question. Work on “paired” questions one after the other.

6. (C)
Boiled down to its essentials, ¶ 1 says that King’s philosophy was in some ways closer to
that of other transcendentalists than to that of Thoreau. In other words, Thoreau’s
philosophy was not exactly the same as that of other transcendentalists.
(A) and (B) are beyond the scope. This passage never discusses either the origins of the
civil disobedience doctrine (A) or “contemporary thinkers” (B). It’s restricted to a
comparison of the ideas of Thoreau, King, and other transcendentalists.
(D) and (E) distort details. Lines 29-32 flatly state that Thoreau wasn’t concerned about
changing the government’s foreign policy (D). Lines 26-28 explicitly say that Thoreau was
“primarily interested in reform of the individual” (E).
• Use the information in the stem to isolate the appropriate part(s) of the text. In this case,
since the question’s about Thoreau only, you can safely ignore ¶ 3.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:45 am
Thanked: 2 times

13 mins

by sumank8216 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:43 pm
1 ) D
2. C
3. B
4. E
5. D
6.C
7.A (assuming higher law is waht line 52-55 referring to)