Can someone please explain how to solve this problem. I guessed correctly on a practice GMAT, but I am not exactly sure how to solve the problem.
Q24:
Four staff members at a certain company worked on a project. The amounts of time that the four staff members worked on the project were in the ratio 2 to 3 to 5 to 6. If one of the four staff members worked on the project for 30 hours, which of the following CANNOT be the total number of hours that the four staff members worked on the project?
A. 80
B. 96
C. 160
D. 192
E. 240
[spoiler]Answer: D[/spoiler]
Ratio Problems
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 527
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 9:14 am
- Location: Atlanta
- Thanked: 17 times
should be D.
Let ratios be 2x,3x,5x & 6x
if 2x = 30, then total hours = 30 + 45 + 75 +90 = 240
if 3x = 30, then total hours = 20 + 30 + 50 +60 = 160
if 5x = 30, then total hours = 12 + 18 + 30 + 36 = 96
if 6x = 30, then total hours = 10 + 15 + 25 + 30 = 80
only option left out is D
Let ratios be 2x,3x,5x & 6x
if 2x = 30, then total hours = 30 + 45 + 75 +90 = 240
if 3x = 30, then total hours = 20 + 30 + 50 +60 = 160
if 5x = 30, then total hours = 12 + 18 + 30 + 36 = 96
if 6x = 30, then total hours = 10 + 15 + 25 + 30 = 80
only option left out is D
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:58 pm
- Thanked: 10 times
- GMAT Score:710
So the previous post listed all the hours for each of 4 employees such asjba05d wrote:Thanks. I started to do that on the test, but I felt that it took to long. Does anyone know a faster methodology, or is that way simply the fastest.
If we do this then we have to spend a lot of time calculating each employees hours...if 2x = 30, then total hours = 30 + 45 + 75 +90 = 240
One way to make this quicker is to understand that the sum of all hours = 2x + 3x + 5x + 6x = 16x.
So if 2x = 30; 16x = 240
If 3x = 30; 16x = 160
If 5x = 30; 16x = 96
If 6x = 30; 16x = 80
Hence this only leaves out 192...so the answer is D.
Hopefully this helps make it quicker!
Attempt 1: 710, 92% (Q 42, 63%; V 44, 97%)
Attempt 2: Coming soon!
Attempt 2: Coming soon!
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:01 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 2 times
hope below method will take lesser time for you
start with 2x, this will give the time = 240 ....(1)
next with 3x this will give the time = 160 .....(2)
Now, if you will take the higher ratio, amount if time will be decrease. You may deduce this pattern from the equ 1 and 2. Hence the only option that is inbetween 240 and 160 is 192(option D). You cnt get this answr as time is gettting decreased.
start with 2x, this will give the time = 240 ....(1)
next with 3x this will give the time = 160 .....(2)
Now, if you will take the higher ratio, amount if time will be decrease. You may deduce this pattern from the equ 1 and 2. Hence the only option that is inbetween 240 and 160 is 192(option D). You cnt get this answr as time is gettting decreased.