BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Ratio Problem

Expert replies

by gmatusa2010 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:43 pm
I had forgotten the obvious fundamentals. These types of ratio problems have always appeared in Men to Women, Marbles, Workers, etc... formats. I'm so used to thinking number properties. Good reminder and lesson. Thanks.
Rahul@gurome wrote:
gmatusa2010 wrote:The ratio of two positive numbers is 3 to 4. If k is added to each number the new ratio will be 4 to 5, and the sum of the numbers will be 117. What is the value of k?

1,
13,
14,
18,
21


I don't get this problem, isn't the 4 to 5 ratio useless information? Can't you solve this fine without that info. Can someone check my work. Also ambiguous with the sum of the numbers will be 117. My first read, I thought it was Old number 1, Old number 2, and K. But its not, according to the solution. Its actually new number 1 + new number 2= 117.

X/Y=3/4, X+K+Y+K=117 , X+Y+2k=117

Since, X+Y are multiples of 7, I'm going to re-write the problem as 7Q+2K=117
7Q= (117-2K) has to be divisible by 7. Number testing, yields only 13.
Everything is fine with your approach except a single flaw in your logic!
As you have found out three equations in three unknowns, which are
  • (1) 4x = 3y
    (2) 5*(x + k) = 4*(y + k)
    (3) (x + y + 2k) = 117
Now the values of x or y or k can only be uniquely obtained if and only if we consider all the three equations together. Otherwise if we take any two of them, we cannot solve them for sure.

For example, in your case you have considered 1st and 3rd equation only.
Let's see what we can achieve with these two equations. From the first equation we have y = (4x/3). Replace y with this value in the third equation. Then we have, (x + 4x/3 + 2k) = 117. Thus,
  • k = 117 - (7x/3)
As we have expected we cannot uniquely determine the value of k as it depends upon x.

Where have gone wrong then?
You've done a very common assumption which lead you in the wrong way! What is that? You assumed x and y to be integer and thus said that (x + y) is divisible by 7! In the question they were declared as numbers only! So basically you are assuming a new information and discarding a given information!

Conclusion: "The ratio of two positive numbers is 3 to 4 doesn't mean sum of the numbers is divisible by 7! For example 3/5 and 4/5 has a ratio 3 to 4, but their sum 7/5 is not divisible by 7!
Join the discussion