BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

As part of a game, four people each must secretly choose an

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by FinanceBioE » Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:43 pm
Hi again,

So 4 people have the option of choosing 1,2,3 or 4

Therefore the first person can choose any number and the probability of that is 1

The second person can only choose 3 of the 4 numbers and the probability of that is 3/4

The third person can only choose 2 of the 4 numbers and the probability of that is 2/4

The final person can only choose 1 of the 4 numbers and the probability of that is 1/4

Therefore

1 * (3/4) * (2/4) * (1/4) = 3/32

~9%
Join the discussion

by PussInBoots » Sun Sep 13, 2009 10:26 pm
I disagree

Total combinations: 4*4*4*4
Total combinations of different numbers: 4*3*2*1

Answer is 4! / 4^4 = 1/8, hence ~12%
Join the discussion

by xcusemeplz2009 » Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:18 am
PussInBoots wrote:I disagree

Total combinations: 4*4*4*4
Total combinations of different numbers: 4*3*2*1

Answer is 4! / 4^4 = 1/8, hence ~12%
4!/4^4=3/32 (pls check again)=9% approx.

i do agree with this method
It does not matter how many times you get knocked down , but how many times you get up
Join the discussion

by ssuarezo » Mon Sep 14, 2009 7:12 pm
Please, what's the answer? is it 9% correct?
Silvia
Join the discussion

by getso » Thu Sep 24, 2009 10:12 pm
Could anyone please clarify what is the correct solution for this problem.
Join the discussion

by engg.manik » Thu Sep 24, 2009 11:33 pm
Sanjib please clarfiy the confusion.

What is the correct answer
Join the discussion

by me10gmat800 » Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:25 am
xcusemeplz2009 wrote:
PussInBoots wrote:I disagree

Total combinations: 4*4*4*4
Total combinations of different numbers: 4*3*2*1

Answer is 4! / 4^4 = 1/8, hence ~12%
4!/4^4=3/32 (pls check again)=9% approx.

i do agree with this method

Have one doubt so allow me to reopen this discussion...

Is this one of the standard probability formulas/rules (4!/4^4 generalized form -> n!/n^n) that could be used in such type of questions?

I solved this q in similar fashion that automatically led to this rule/formula:

1st person able to choose in 4/4 ways, 2nd person 3/4, 3rd 2/4 and 4th 1/4.

Therefore the probability is 4/4 * 3/4 * 2/4 * 1/4 = 4! / 4^4 (rule)

Could someone explain why and when this rule could be used?

Thanks very much in advance.
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:53 am
me10gmat800 wrote:
xcusemeplz2009 wrote:
PussInBoots wrote:I disagree

Total combinations: 4*4*4*4
Total combinations of different numbers: 4*3*2*1

Answer is 4! / 4^4 = 1/8, hence ~12%
4!/4^4=3/32 (pls check again)=9% approx.

i do agree with this method

Have one doubt so allow me to reopen this discussion...

Is this one of the standard probability formulas/rules (4!/4^4 generalized form -> n!/n^n) that could be used in such type of questions?

I solved this q in similar fashion that automatically led to this rule/formula:

1st person able to choose in 4/4 ways, 2nd person 3/4, 3rd 2/4 and 4th 1/4.

Therefore the probability is 4/4 * 3/4 * 2/4 * 1/4 = 4! / 4^4 (rule)

Could someone explain why and when this rule could be used?

Thanks very much in advance.
Guys, the two "methods" related above both lead to the same result:
1 * (3/4) * (2/4) * (1/4) = 3/32

rewrite the 1 as 4/4 (which is what FinanceBioE effectively did), and you get the famed
4! / 4^4 = 3/32.

the only difference is a matter of interpretation of the results: is 3/32 equal to 9% or 12%?
the answer is indeed 9%, but i can understand the confusion of those who went for 12: 4/32 is 1/8=12.5%, which is almost (but not quite) the same as the actual result of 3/32. The way to transition from 3/32 to percents is to remember the following rule:
to move from
Percent ---> fraction you divide by 100 Thus, 12% is equivalent to the fraction 12/100.
fraction ---> percent you do the opposite: multiply by 100. Thus, 3/32 is 3*100/32 "percents" = 300/32 %= slightly less than 10%, or 9% final.

As for whether this question is a standard probability formula: there are too many of them (and too many combi/probability questions that break them slightly) for you to rely on definite formulas, IMHO - that's what makes this topic so formidable, as each question has its own quirks. So, yes, any question exactly such as this one will conform to the n!/n^n formula, but there's really no substitute to reasoning through the question and building the relevant calculation for each individual case, i.e.: number of wanted outcomes = reduce one each choice = 4*3*2*1=4!
Total number of outcomes = 4 for each choice.

OR

probability for each event, as with the original reply (my own favored method here).
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by pzazz12 » Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:37 am
Geva Stern wrote:
me10gmat800 wrote:
xcusemeplz2009 wrote:
PussInBoots wrote:I disagree

Total combinations: 4*4*4*4
Total combinations of different numbers: 4*3*2*1

Answer is 4! / 4^4 = 1/8, hence ~12%
4!/4^4=3/32 (pls check again)=9% approx.

i do agree with this method

Have one doubt so allow me to reopen this discussion...

Is this one of the standard probability formulas/rules (4!/4^4 generalized form -> n!/n^n) that could be used in such type of questions?

I solved this q in similar fashion that automatically led to this rule/formula:

1st person able to choose in 4/4 ways, 2nd person 3/4, 3rd 2/4 and 4th 1/4.

Therefore the probability is 4/4 * 3/4 * 2/4 * 1/4 = 4! / 4^4 (rule)

Could someone explain why and when this rule could be used?

Thanks very much in advance.
Guys, the two "methods" related above both lead to the same result:
1 * (3/4) * (2/4) * (1/4) = 3/32

rewrite the 1 as 4/4 (which is what FinanceBioE effectively did), and you get the famed
4! / 4^4 = 3/32.

the only difference is a matter of interpretation of the results: is 3/32 equal to 9% or 12%?
the answer is indeed 9%, but i can understand the confusion of those who went for 12: 4/32 is 1/8=12.5%, which is almost (but not quite) the same as the actual result of 3/32. The way to transition from 3/32 to percents is to remember the following rule:
to move from
Percent ---> fraction you divide by 100 Thus, 12% is equivalent to the fraction 12/100.
fraction ---> percent you do the opposite: multiply by 100. Thus, 3/32 is 3*100/32 "percents" = 300/32 %= slightly less than 10%, or 9% final.

As for whether this question is a standard probability formula: there are too many of them (and too many combi/probability questions that break them slightly) for you to rely on definite formulas, IMHO - that's what makes this topic so formidable, as each question has its own quirks. So, yes, any question exactly such as this one will conform to the n!/n^n formula, but there's really no substitute to reasoning through the question and building the relevant calculation for each individual case, i.e.: number of wanted outcomes = reduce one each choice = 4*3*2*1=4!
Total number of outcomes = 4 for each choice.

OR

probability for each event, as with the original reply (my own favored method here).
thank u........for your brief explanation.........
Join the discussion

by dazzle » Thu Oct 21, 2010 9:28 am
Hi All,
I have a very basic question here. I am extremely poor with probability and combinations.
Can any provide a short explanation as to how the total no of combinations is n^n ?

i have seen a few problems " when 3 dice are rolled the total no of combinations are 6^3.
similarly in this case, it is 4^4.
Can someone pls explain why?

is the general rule something like , (possible combinations to be played with)^ (no of times the activity is done)??

ie In the 3 dice case, since each die has 6 combinations and it is rolled 3 times so it should be 6^3
Similarly in this problem since there are 4 nos (hence 4 combinations to be played with) ^ (no of times/ppl) ?

Appreciate any help in this regard.
Thanks
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Thu Oct 21, 2010 11:56 am
dazzle wrote:Hi All,
I have a very basic question here. I am extremely poor with probability and combinations.
Can any provide a short explanation as to how the total no of combinations is n^n ?

i have seen a few problems " when 3 dice are rolled the total no of combinations are 6^3.
similarly in this case, it is 4^4.
Can someone pls explain why?

is the general rule something like , (possible combinations to be played with)^ (no of times the activity is done)??

ie In the 3 dice case, since each die has 6 combinations and it is rolled 3 times so it should be 6^3
Similarly in this problem since there are 4 nos (hence 4 combinations to be played with) ^ (no of times/ppl) ?

Appreciate any help in this regard.
Thanks
You got it. The idea is to break down the problem into a series of rolls, one step at a time: Not three dice, but first, second, third roll, and deal with each one separetly.
For each roll, figure out the number of possible outcomes. On a die, these are 1-6, so there are 6 possible options. So each of the rolls (1st, 2nd 3rd) has 6 options. The final outcome is 6*6*6, or 6^3.
Why do we multiply the number of each roll? For one, you can just take it as a given - in a string of events, multiply the numbers at the end.
The logic behind it is this: the first die roll has 6 options: 1-6
For each of these options, there are 6 options for the second roll:
If we rolled 1 on the first die, we have 6 options for the second: 1-1, 1-2, 1-3, 1-5, 1-6
If we rolled a 2 on the first die, again, 6 rolls: 2-1, 2-2, 2-3...etc.
Thus, 6 options for the first die, and 6 options for each of them on the second die come down to 6*6=36 options.
The third die presents another 6 options for each of these 6*6 combinations of the first 2, so again, we multiply times 6 again: 6*6*6=6^3.

Let's say that we want the probability of three different rolls on 6 dice. You already have the bottom of the fraction - the total number of possible combinations: 6^3. How many wanted outcomes?
Here, we again break down to one step at a time, and ask how many options are wanted outcomes for each roll:
For the first die, we don't really care what number comes up, so all 6 options are wanted outcomes.
For the second roll, we want a different number than the first: whatever we rolled on the first, we'd only have 5 options for a different number on the second.
For the third roll, we want a different number from the first two: only 4 remain.
Thus, the total number of wanted outcomes for different results on three dice is 6*5*4.
The total probability of this even will therefore be 6*5*4 / 6*6*6 = 20/36 = 5/9.
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:03 pm
What's the probability of getting "heads" on all three tosses of an even coin?
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion

by dazzle » Thu Oct 21, 2010 12:23 pm
Thanks a bunch for explaining the concept Geva.

"What's the probability of getting "heads" on all three tosses of an even coin?"

For the first toss, we can have 2 outcomes. ie head or tail.
hence as per your explanation, we will have 2^3 = 8 total outcomes.
The possibility of HHH will therefore be 1/8

Hope my answer is correct .
Join the discussion

by Geva@EconomistGMAT » Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:56 pm
dazzle wrote:Thanks a bunch for explaining the concept Geva.

"What's the probability of getting "heads" on all three tosses of an even coin?"

For the first toss, we can have 2 outcomes. ie head or tail.
hence as per your explanation, we will have 2^3 = 8 total outcomes.
The possibility of HHH will therefore be 1/8

Hope my answer is correct .
Indeed - to the letter.
Let's mix things up a bit. What's the probability of getting two "heads" on three tosses? Anyone?
Geva
Senior Instructor
Master GMAT
1-888-780-GMAT
https://www.mastergmat.com
Join the discussion