Hi kiennguyen,kiennguyen wrote:imo D. OA pls
Actually, choice D is mathematically impossible. This is because the range for moderate rain is something just over 1 inch up to 2 inches.
To test it, let's maximize rain per moderately rain in 1990 at 2 inches, and minimize rain per moderately rainy day in 1910 at 1.00000.....1 inch.
So if you had an equal number of moderately rainy days in both years, then the ratio of 1990 mod rain/1910 mod rain would be: 2/1.0000.....1. This already makes it mathematically impossible.
But of course, there were fewer moderately rainy days in 1990, which means there were more in 1910, so our ratio would really look like: 2/(1.00000...1+).
Which means it is mathematically impossible for the amount of rain that fell on moderately rainy days in 1990 to have been more than twice as great as the amount of rain that fell on moderately rainy days in 1910.












