BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

QR #49: How many integers n are there such that r<n<s

Expert replies
by saintforlife » Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:59 pm
How many integers n are there such that r < n < s?

(1) s - r = 5
(2) r and s are not integers

OA = C

I read the answer explanation in the Quant Review #2 book, but I don't understand something.

By combining both, if you say that the number of integers n=5 between r and s, doesn't the example they give in Statement 1 solution violate the inequality?

They say if r=6.5 and s=11.5, then n=5. Doesn't this violate r<n<s inequality because clearly n=5 < r=6.5?

I know it works for cases such as r=0.1 and s=5.1, then n=5. Here the inequality r<n<s holds, but for the above case, it doesn't.

Can somebody weigh-in? What am I missing?
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by pemdas » Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:36 pm
did you understand the logic behind this question?
why to ask about this gibberish by official explanation

if we knew about s and r (integers or not integers) our task would be simplified to st(1) Suff. Since we know nothing about s and r, there could be always four integers (case when s and r are integers) or five integers (when s or r is not integer)

st(2) helps with assigning type for our numbers (s and r), but we know nothing about values

combined st(1&2) supports our previously inquired data, i.e. s and r are not integers, hence the number of integers in the given interval will always be 5.

answer c)
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by kullayappayenugula » Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:15 pm
hi...you got the question wrong. The n is not the number of integers but the integers themsleves.

How many integers n are there such that r < n < s?
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Nov 04, 2012 10:19 pm
saintforlife wrote:How many integers n are there such that r < n < s?
(1) s - r = 5
(2) r and s are not integers
Target question: How many integers n are there such that r < n < s? [/color]

Statement 1: s - r = 5
There are two cases we need to consider.
Case a: s and r are integers.
For example, s=6 and r=1, in which case there are 4 integers between r and s (2, 3, 4 and 5)
Case b: s and r are not integers.
For example, s=6.1 and r=1.1, in which case there are 5 integers between r and s (2, 3, 4, 5, and 6)

Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: r and s are not integers
This is definitely not enough information here to answer the target question.
Consider these 2 cases.
Case a: r=1.1 and s=2.1, in which case there is 1 integer between r and s (2)
Case a: r=1.1 and s=3.1, in which case there are 2 integers between r and s (2 and 3)

Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT

Statements 1 and 2 combined:
From statement 1, we know that there are either 4 or 5 integers between r and s, depending on whether or not r and s are integers.
Statement 2 rules out the possibility that r and s are integers.
If r and s are non integers, then there must be 5 integers between r and s

Since we can answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT

Answer = C

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by vsri1987 » Sun Sep 22, 2013 1:47 am
Hi Brent,

s - r = 5

If s=3 and r=-2 then we will have 0 as well in the integer list(count will be 5), isn't it?
Also, it is nowhere mentioned that these are positive integers or do we just assume this in GMAT, please suggest?


Regards,
Vishal
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sun Sep 22, 2013 5:49 am
vsri1987 wrote:Hi Brent,

s - r = 5

If s=3 and r=-2 then we will have 0 as well in the integer list(count will be 5), isn't it?
Also, it is nowhere mentioned that these are positive integers or do we just assume this in GMAT, please suggest?


Regards,
Vishal
Good question.

If s=3 and r=-2, then -1, 0, 1, and 2 (4 values) are the only integers between r and s.

To answer your main question, there is nothing in the original question that tells us that r and s must be positive.
In fact there are MANY (an infinite number actually) different values for r and s (both positive and negative) that we can use to demonstrate that statement 1 is not sufficient.
I happened to use positive numbers to demonstrate this, but I could have also used negative numbers.
The bottom line is that, for statement 1, there will be either 4 or 5 integers that are between r and s.
As such, we cannot answer the target question with certainty.

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by theCodeToGMAT » Sun Sep 22, 2013 6:41 am
s > n > r

1. s - r = 5
if r & s are integers .. then 4 integers.
(0.1) and (5.1) --> 5 integers..
INSUFFICIENT

2. r & s are not integers

INSUFFiCIENT since there is not relation..


Combining...

SUFFICIENT

ANSWER [spoiler][C][/spoiler]
R A H U L
Join the discussion

saintforlife wrote:
Sun Nov 04, 2012 12:59 pm
How many integers n are there such that r < n < s?

(1) s - r = 5
(2) r and s are not integers

OA = C

Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine the number of integers between r and s.

Statement One Alone:

Statement one alone is not sufficient. For example, if r = 1 and s = 6, then there are 4 integers between r and s, namely, 2, 3, 4, and 5. However, if r = 1.1 and s = 6.1, then there are 5 integers between r and s, namely 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Statement Two Alone:

Statement two alone is not sufficient. For example, if r = 1.1 and s = 2.1, then there is 1 integer between r and s, namely, 2. However, if r = 1.1 and s = 3.1, then there are 2 integers between r and s, namely 2 and 3.

Statements One and Two Together:

Both statements together are sufficient since there will be 5 integers between r and s when they are not integers themselves as we can see from the analysis from Statement One Alone when r = 1.1 and s = 6.1. We can prove this as follows:

Let [r] be the greatest integer less than or equal to r. Since r is not an integer, [r] < r. Since s - r = 5, s = r + 5, so the integers between r and s (or r + 5) are [r] + 1, [r] + 2, [r] + 3, [r] + 4 and [r] + 5. Therefore, there are 5 integers.

Answer: C

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage
Join the discussion