BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

q114, OG QR 1st ed

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by Testluv » Wed Oct 20, 2010 9:59 pm
Hi,

in a data sufficiency question involving inequalities, start thinking about signs (pos vs neg).

The question is:

Is 1/(a-b)<b-a?

We should note that (a-b) and (b-a) will have opposite signs (or if they are both zero, then no sign).

(1) tells us that a<b. When we subtract something large from something smaller, the result is negative. Thus, 1/(a-b) is negative. And when we subtract something small from something larger, the result is positive. Thus, (b-a) is positive. Thus, the question becomes:

Is (-ve)<(+ve)?

The answer is "definitely yes", and so (1) is sufficient. Eliminate B, C, and E.

(2) tells us that |a-b|>1. "|a-b|" means the distance between "a" and "b" on the number line. So, the distance between a and b on the number line is greater than 1. So, for example, a could be 4 and b could be 2, in which case 1/(a-b) is positive and (b-a) is negative, and the question becomes:

Is (+ve)<(-ve)? and the answer is "no".

However, it could also be the other way around: a could be 2 and b could be 4 (the distance between them is still greater than 1, so we are satisfying the statement). But in this case the answer to the question is "yes".

Because we can get both a "yes" and "no" answer, (2) is not sufficient.

(1) is sufficient by itself; (2) is not; choose A.
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Wed Oct 20, 2010 10:03 pm
The question is Is 1/(a-b) < (b-a)?
Consider first (1) alone.
It says a<b.
Or a-b<0.
Or a-b is negative.
So even 1/(a-b) is negative.
Also b-a>0.
Or b-a is positive.
So obviously, since a negative quantity is less than a positive quantity, 1/(a-b) < (b-a).
So (1) alone is sufficient.
Next consider (2) alone.
It says 1 < la-bl.
It means a-b > 1 or a-b < -1.
So a-b can be either positive or negative and we cannot say definitely whether 1/(a-b) < (b-a) or not.
Or (2) alone is not sufficient.
The correct answer is (A).
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion

by diebeatsthegmat » Thu Oct 21, 2010 10:10 am
Rahul@gurome wrote:The question is Is 1/(a-b) < (b-a)?
Consider first (1) alone.
It says a<b.
Or a-b<0.
Or a-b is negative.
So even 1/(a-b) is negative.
Also b-a>0.
Or b-a is positive.
So obviously, since a negative quantity is less than a positive quantity, 1/(a-b) < (b-a).
So (1) alone is sufficient.
Next consider (2) alone.
It says 1 < la-bl.
It means a-b > 1 or a-b < -1.
So a-b can be either positive or negative and we cannot say definitely whether 1/(a-b) < (b-a) or not.
Or (2) alone is not sufficient.
The correct answer is (A).
my speed is so bad for math... i am dumb these days... but rahul, can i solve the problem like this:
1/(a-b)<(b-a) <=> 1/(a-b)+(a-b) <0 <=> [1+(a-b)^2]/(a-b)<0
now i will have to see if [1+(a-b)^2]/(a-b)<0
1. a<b
because (a-b)^2>0 with all a, b so 1+(a-b)^2>0 with all a and b
and a-b <0 so sufficient
2. 1<|a-b|
a-b>1 or a-b<-1
no conclusion about this, thus sufficient
Join the discussion

by Rahul@gurome » Thu Oct 21, 2010 7:36 pm
my speed is so bad for math... i am dumb these days... but rahul, can i solve the problem like this:
1/(a-b)<(b-a) <=> 1/(a-b)+(a-b) <0 <=> [1+(a-b)^2]/(a-b)<0
now i will have to see if [1+(a-b)^2]/(a-b)<0
1. a<b
because (a-b)^2>0 with all a, b so 1+(a-b)^2>0 with all a and b
and a-b <0 so sufficient
2. 1<|a-b|
a-b>1 or a-b<-1
no conclusion about this, thus sufficient
What you have done is also correct. It is ultimately the same thing.
Rahul Lakhani
Quant Expert
Gurome, Inc.
https://www.GuroMe.com
On MBA sabbatical (at ISB) for 2011-12 - will stay active as time permits
1-800-566-4043 (USA)
+91-99201 32411 (India)
Join the discussion