Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Q. from Integers- Interpretation of Q&A please.

Expert replies
by shimmer » Mon Jul 18, 2011 5:13 am
Hi,

I realize that there are a couple of posts around this question on the forum already. However, I'm having trouble with not just understanding the solution (in the book and the ones on the forum) but with interpreting the question as well.

"A wire is cut into 3 equal parts. The resulting segments are then cut into 4,6 and 8 equal parts respectively. If each of the resulting segments has an integer length, what is the minimum length of the wire? "

- Initially I understood it as the wire is cut into 1/3+1/3+1/3. Followed by
-piece one= 1/3*1/4
-piece two= 1/3*1/6
-piece three= 1/3*1/8

Therefore making the smallest piece 1/24 of the original. I understand this isn't an integer (and the question in the book doesn't have answer choices) but if 24 was listed as an answer option that's what I would have picked.

From the answer explanation given in the book and on the forum so far (neither of which I understand yet), I'm on an entirely wrong track.

Can someone please please break this down for me? Thanks a lot!

PS: Underlining and bold-ing the parts of the question I think I'm misunderstanding.
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by amit2k9 » Mon Jul 18, 2011 6:26 am
lcm of 3,4,6 and 8 is 24.

since each part has to be divisible by 4,6 and 8

meaning

24 = 2*3*4, hence each part must be of length 24.

thus 24*3 = 72. smallest part of 24/8 = 3.

hence 3/72 = 1/24 is the smallest part.
For Understanding Sustainability,Green Businesses and Social Entrepreneurship visit -https://aamthoughts.blocked/
(Featured Best Green Site Worldwide-https://bloggers.com/green/popular/page2)
Join the discussion

by kevincanspain » Mon Jul 18, 2011 7:53 am
shimmer wrote:Hi,

I realize that there are a couple of posts around this question on the forum already. However, I'm having trouble with not just understanding the solution (in the book and the ones on the forum) but with interpreting the question as well.

"A wire is cut into 3 equal parts. The resulting segments are then cut into 4,6 and 8 equal parts respectively. If each of the resulting segments has an integer length, what is the minimum length of the wire? "

- Initially I understood it as the wire is cut into 1/3+1/3+1/3. Followed by
-piece one= 1/3*1/4
-piece two= 1/3*1/6
-piece three= 1/3*1/8

Therefore making the smallest piece 1/24 of the original. I understand this isn't an integer (and the question in the book doesn't have answer choices) but if 24 was listed as an answer option that's what I would have picked.

From the answer explanation given in the book and on the forum so far (neither of which I understand yet), I'm on an entirely wrong track.

Can someone please please break this down for me? Thanks a lot!

PS: Underlining and bold-ing the parts of the question I think I'm misunderstanding.
Let's say that that the original wire has a length of x units. It is cut into 3 pieces of length x/3.
The first piece is divided into 4 pieces of length x/12, the second into 6 pieces of length x/18, and the third into 8 pieces of x/24. Thus x must be a multiple of 12, 18 and 24. 72 is the smallest such integer
Kevin Armstrong
GMAT Instructor
Gmatclasses
Madrid
Join the discussion