Q-34
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 10:38 pm
- Location: Bangalore
- Thanked: 1 times
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hi Sandysanjana wrote:Brett,
Shouldnt it be 0<x<1?
According to you,
-1<x<=0
If x>-1
Say x=-0.63,then [x] = -1,since [x] is defined as greatest integer less than or equal to x.
I'm a little confused here.
The function is defined as the least integer that is greater than or equal to X.
So, for -0.63, we're looking for an integer that is greater than or equal to -0.63
Possible integers include 0, 1, 2, 3, etc
The function tells us to take the least of these values (i.e., 0)
In your answer, x could equal 0.5
So, possible integers include 1, 2, 3, etc
The function tells us to take the least of these values (i.e., 1) We need [x] to equal 0
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Actually [x] is defined as the "least integer greater than or equal to x."sanjana wrote:since [x] is defined as greatest integer less than or equal to x.
Under your definition, you'd be correct, but you misread the question.
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course