BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Q-34

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

Re: Q-34

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Oct 10, 2009 6:58 am
engg.manik wrote:34. [X]is the least integer greater than or equal to X, if [X]=0, what is the possible range of values of X?
x must be greater than -1 and less than or equal to 0
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by sanjana » Sat Oct 10, 2009 7:23 am
Brett,

Shouldnt it be 0<x<1?

According to you,

-1<x<=0

If x>-1
Say x=-0.63,then [x] = -1,since [x] is defined as greatest integer less than or equal to x.

I'm a little confused here.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:52 am
sanjana wrote:Brett,

Shouldnt it be 0<x<1?

According to you,

-1<x<=0

If x>-1
Say x=-0.63,then [x] = -1,since [x] is defined as greatest integer less than or equal to x.

I'm a little confused here.
Hi Sandy :)

The function is defined as the least integer that is greater than or equal to X.
So, for -0.63, we're looking for an integer that is greater than or equal to -0.63
Possible integers include 0, 1, 2, 3, etc
The function tells us to take the least of these values (i.e., 0)

In your answer, x could equal 0.5
So, possible integers include 1, 2, 3, etc
The function tells us to take the least of these values (i.e., 1) We need [x] to equal 0
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Sat Oct 10, 2009 10:04 am
sanjana wrote:since [x] is defined as greatest integer less than or equal to x.
Actually [x] is defined as the "least integer greater than or equal to x."

Under your definition, you'd be correct, but you misread the question.
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course
Join the discussion