BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

School integration

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Thanked: 3 times
by drgmatIL » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:15 am
School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed, according to a recent study, to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
(A) significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces
(B) significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces
(C) increase housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces
(D) increase housing integration significantly, in turn reducing
(E) significantly increase housing integration, which, in turn, reduce

E is wrong because "reduce"
I thought that we need increase after to in order to prevent "broken" infinitive
Why C is wrong? Why A is correct?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:47 am
Adverb signficantly should modify the verb "increase" and not the subject "Housing integration"

This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.

A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun

Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"

Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 amFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 55 times

by iamcste » Tue Sep 09, 2008 4:55 am
Adverb signficantly should modify the verb "increase" and not the subject "Housing integration"

This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.

A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun

Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"

Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 443
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by Vignesh.4384 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 6:15 am
iamcste wrote:Adverb signficantly should modify the verb "increase" and not the subject "Housing integration"

This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.

A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun

Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"

Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
Which should refer to a non and not to a phrase.
In option C which is tryinh to modify the phrase" to increase housing integration significantly".

In option A which correctly modifies the noun integration.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: Maharashtra, India

by MBAnce » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:22 am
if 'increases' (plural) is noun, should 'reduces' be 'reduce'?
[I really hope that this thread is not dead yet!:)]
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 77
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:12 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by shilpi84 » Sat Jul 11, 2009 9:36 am
MBAnce wrote:if 'increases' (plural) is noun, should 'reduces' be 'reduce'?
[I really hope that this thread is not de@d yet!:)]
Housing integration is singular hence reduces should be used.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:26 pm

by lamhe » Sat Jul 11, 2009 10:49 am
contribut to is the correct idiom....A is correct here
Vishal
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:02 pmFollowed by: 3 members
Thanked: 5 times

by turbo jet » Sat Jul 11, 2009 12:48 pm
Bw A & E
Subject Verb Agreement Qs

Subject: Housing Integration ( singular)
Verb should be: Reduces

B: Meaning gets changed
C: Modifier error; Significant modifies increase and should be placed next to increase
D: Modifier error; Significant modifies increase and should be placed next to increase

Cheers
TJ :D
Life is Tom; I am Jerry ;)
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:12 am
Thanked: 6 times

by btg760 » Sat Jul 11, 2009 6:48 pm
Let's rewrite each option once again:-

(A) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
No error, let's keep it.

(B) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
Significant increase in housing integration or significant integration? Meaning changed.

(C) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to increase in housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
IN is missing

(D) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to increase in housing integration significantly, in turn reducing any future need for busing.
IN is missing

(E) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significantly increase in housing integration, which, in turn, reduce any future need for busing.
IN is missing
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:11 pm
Location: Maharashtra, India

by MBAnce » Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:58 am
shilpi84 wrote:
MBAnce wrote:if 'increases' (plural) is noun, should 'reduces' be 'reduce'?
[I really hope that this thread is not de@d yet!:)]
Housing integration is singular hence reduces should be used.
Thanks for your response, but I am still not fully convinced :!:
I am still doubtful about what caused 'reduction in any future need for busing'; 'INCREASES in housing integration' or 'HOUSING INTEGRATION'.

Any inputs would be greatly appreciated.
Any Test Takers In Maharashtra?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:02 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Location: San Jose, CA
Thanked: 43 times
GMAT Score:720

Re: School integration

by dumb.doofus » Sun Jul 12, 2009 8:39 am
drgmatIL wrote:School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed, according to a recent study, to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
(A) significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces
(B) significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces
(C) increase housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces
(D) increase housing integration significantly, in turn reducing
(E) significantly increase housing integration, which, in turn, reduce

E is wrong because "reduce"
I thought that we need increase after to in order to prevent "broken" infinitive
Why C is wrong? Why A is correct?
I think this whole question is about misplaced modifiers, modifiers that modify something you didn't intend them to modify.

B is incorrect because of misplaced modifier problem. "increases" should be just after significant.

C is also incorrect because of misplaced modifier problem. "Significantly" should be placed before increase.

D.. same issue as C.
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Jul 04, 2009 3:55 am

by syflysun » Fri Aug 21, 2009 6:08 pm
btw, two more questions:
where is the right place for a "adv" such as significantly here?

1>to increase sth. significantly
2>to significantly increase sth. [i do remember "to+adv+do" is an incorrect structure in some gmat sc book.]

what should follow "contribute to"

1> contribute to do
2> contribute to doing
3> contribute to n.

many thanks. let us discuss!!!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pmFollowed by: 1 member
Thanked: 15 times
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:19 pm
MBAnce wrote:
shilpi84 wrote:
MBAnce wrote:if 'increases' (plural) is noun, should 'reduces' be 'reduce'?
[I really hope that this thread is not de@d yet!:)]
Housing integration is singular hence reduces should be used.
Thanks for your response, but I am still not fully convinced :!:
I am still doubtful about what caused 'reduction in any future need for busing'; 'INCREASES in housing integration' or 'HOUSING INTEGRATION'.

Any inputs would be greatly appreciated.
It again boils down to what does WHICH refer to? Considering context and meaning, it appears to me that both seem to be correct

- Increases in housing integration
- Housing integration

What does 'which' refer to here? Depending on this, verb (reduce vs reduces) need to be decided.

Any thoughts on the above?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1