School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed, according to a recent study, to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
(A) significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces
(B) significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces
(C) increase housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces
(D) increase housing integration significantly, in turn reducing
(E) significantly increase housing integration, which, in turn, reduce
E is wrong because "reduce"
I thought that we need increase after to in order to prevent "broken" infinitive
Why C is wrong? Why A is correct?
School integration
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
- Thanked: 55 times
- Followed by:1 members
Adverb signficantly should modify the verb "increase" and not the subject "Housing integration"
This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.
A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun
Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"
Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.
A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun
Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"
Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 940
- Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 3:22 am
- Thanked: 55 times
- Followed by:1 members
Adverb signficantly should modify the verb "increase" and not the subject "Housing integration"
This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.
A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun
Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"
Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.
A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun
Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"
Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:33 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
Which should refer to a non and not to a phrase.iamcste wrote:Adverb signficantly should modify the verb "increase" and not the subject "Housing integration"
This is reason why C is defintely not the answer.
A is correct bcoz "increases" now becomes the subject and "significant" is now an adjective and an adjective can modify noun
Plus reduces gives precise subject verb agreement "reduces"
Anybody , if there is a fallacy, in reasoning, kindly let me know
In option C which is tryinh to modify the phrase" to increase housing integration significantly".
In option A which correctly modifies the noun integration.
- turbo jet
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 10:02 pm
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
Bw A & E
Subject Verb Agreement Qs
Subject: Housing Integration ( singular)
Verb should be: Reduces
B: Meaning gets changed
C: Modifier error; Significant modifies increase and should be placed next to increase
D: Modifier error; Significant modifies increase and should be placed next to increase
Cheers
TJ
Subject Verb Agreement Qs
Subject: Housing Integration ( singular)
Verb should be: Reduces
B: Meaning gets changed
C: Modifier error; Significant modifies increase and should be placed next to increase
D: Modifier error; Significant modifies increase and should be placed next to increase
Cheers
TJ
Life is Tom; I am Jerry
Let's rewrite each option once again:-
(A) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
No error, let's keep it.
(B) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
Significant increase in housing integration or significant integration? Meaning changed.
(C) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to increase in housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
IN is missing
(D) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to increase in housing integration significantly, in turn reducing any future need for busing.
IN is missing
(E) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significantly increase in housing integration, which, in turn, reduce any future need for busing.
IN is missing
(A) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
No error, let's keep it.
(B) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
Significant increase in housing integration or significant integration? Meaning changed.
(C) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to increase in housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
IN is missing
(D) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to increase in housing integration significantly, in turn reducing any future need for busing.
IN is missing
(E) School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed to significantly increase in housing integration, which, in turn, reduce any future need for busing.
IN is missing
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Jul 31, 2008 6:11 pm
- Location: Maharashtra, India
Thanks for your response, but I am still not fully convinced :!:shilpi84 wrote:Housing integration is singular hence reduces should be used.MBAnce wrote:if 'increases' (plural) is noun, should 'reduces' be 'reduce'?
[I really hope that this thread is not de@d yet!:)]
I am still doubtful about what caused 'reduction in any future need for busing'; 'INCREASES in housing integration' or 'HOUSING INTEGRATION'.
Any inputs would be greatly appreciated.
Any Test Takers In Maharashtra?
- dumb.doofus
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:02 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
- Thanked: 43 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:720
I think this whole question is about misplaced modifiers, modifiers that modify something you didn't intend them to modify.drgmatIL wrote:School integration plans that involve busing between suburban and central-city areas have contributed, according to a recent study, to significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces any future need for busing.
(A) significant increases in housing integration, which, in turn, reduces
(B) significant integration increases in housing, which, in turn, reduces
(C) increase housing integration significantly, which, in turn, reduces
(D) increase housing integration significantly, in turn reducing
(E) significantly increase housing integration, which, in turn, reduce
E is wrong because "reduce"
I thought that we need increase after to in order to prevent "broken" infinitive
Why C is wrong? Why A is correct?
B is incorrect because of misplaced modifier problem. "increases" should be just after significant.
C is also incorrect because of misplaced modifier problem. "Significantly" should be placed before increase.
D.. same issue as C.
One love, one blood, one life. You got to do what you should.
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
https://dreambigdreamhigh.blocked/
https://gmattoughies.blocked/
btw, two more questions:
where is the right place for a "adv" such as significantly here?
1>to increase sth. significantly
2>to significantly increase sth. [i do remember "to+adv+do" is an incorrect structure in some gmat sc book.]
what should follow "contribute to"
1> contribute to do
2> contribute to doing
3> contribute to n.
many thanks. let us discuss!!!
where is the right place for a "adv" such as significantly here?
1>to increase sth. significantly
2>to significantly increase sth. [i do remember "to+adv+do" is an incorrect structure in some gmat sc book.]
what should follow "contribute to"
1> contribute to do
2> contribute to doing
3> contribute to n.
many thanks. let us discuss!!!
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:690
It again boils down to what does WHICH refer to? Considering context and meaning, it appears to me that both seem to be correctMBAnce wrote:Thanks for your response, but I am still not fully convinced :!:shilpi84 wrote:Housing integration is singular hence reduces should be used.MBAnce wrote:if 'increases' (plural) is noun, should 'reduces' be 'reduce'?
[I really hope that this thread is not de@d yet!:)]
I am still doubtful about what caused 'reduction in any future need for busing'; 'INCREASES in housing integration' or 'HOUSING INTEGRATION'.
Any inputs would be greatly appreciated.
- Increases in housing integration
- Housing integration
What does 'which' refer to here? Depending on this, verb (reduce vs reduces) need to be decided.
Any thoughts on the above?