Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

PS - rectangles

Expert replies
by abhasjha » Mon Sep 08, 2014 6:51 am
A project requires a rectangular sheet of cardboard satisfying the following requirement: When the sheet is cut into identical rectangular halves, each of the resulting rectangles has the same ratio of length to width as the original sheet. Which of the following sheets comes closest to satisfying the requirement?

(A) A sheet measuring 7 inches by 10 inches
(B) A sheet measuring 8 inches by 14 inches
(C) A sheet measuring 10 inches by 13 inches
(D) A sheet measuring 3 feet by 5 feet
(E) A sheet measuring 5 feet by 8 feet
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by GMATGuruNY » Mon Sep 08, 2014 8:31 am
abhasjha wrote:A project requires a rectangular sheet of cardboard satisfying the following requirement: When the sheet is cut into identical rectangular halves, each of the resulting rectangles has the same ratio of length to width as the original sheet. Which of the following sheets comes closest to satisfying the requirement?

(A) A sheet measuring 7 inches by 10 inches
(B) A sheet measuring 8 inches by 14 inches
(C) A sheet measuring 10 inches by 13 inches
(D) A sheet measuring 3 feet by 5 feet
(E) A sheet measuring 5 feet by 8 feet
When the original sheet is cut into identical halves, each of the resulting rectangles has the same ratio of length to width as the original sheet.
This is possible only if the LENGTH of the original sheet is reduced by half, while the original width STAY THE SAME.

We can PLUG IN THE ANSWERS, which represent the dimensions of the original sheet.
To compare the original ratio to the new ratio, CROSS-MULTIPLY.

Answer choice A:
(original width)/(original length) = 7/10.
New ratio = (1/2 the original length)/(original width) = 5/7.
Setting the ratios equal to each other and cross-multiplying, we get:
7/10 = 5/7
7*7 = 10*5
49 = 50.
Looks good.

Answer choice B:
(original width)/(original length) = 8/14.
New ratio = (1/2 the original length)/(original width) = 7/8.
Setting the ratios equal to each other and cross-multiplying, we get:
8/14 = 7/8
8*8 = 14*7
64 = 98.
Since the resulting values in A are closer to each other, eliminate B.

Answer choice C:
(original width)/(original length) = 10/13.
New ratio = (1/2 the original length)/(original width) = 6.5/10 = 13/20.
Setting the ratios equal to each other and cross-multiplying, we get:
10/13 = 13/20
20*10 = 13*13
200 = 169.
Since the resulting values in A are closer to each other, eliminate C.

Answer choice D:
(original width)/(original length) = 3/5.
New ratio = (1/2 the original length)/(original width) = 2.5/3 = 5/6.
Setting the ratios equal to each other and cross-multiplying, we get:
3/5 = 5/6
6*3 = 5*5
18 = 25.
Since the resulting values in A are closer to each other, eliminate D.

Answer choice E:
(original width)/(original length) = 5/8.
New ratio = (1/2 the original length)/(original width) = 4/5.
5/8 = 4/5
5*5 = 8*4
25 = 32.
Since the resulting values in A are closer to each other, eliminate E.

The correct answer is A.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:56 am
Hi abhasjha,

This question has a couple of great pattern-matcher's shortcuts built into it.

First, when cutting a rectangle in half (as the question describes), the only possible way for the ratio of sides to be close is if you cut the LONG SIDE in half. Here's why, using Answer A as an example...

If we start with a 7 x 10 sheet and cut the 7 "in half", then we end up with…

3.5 x 10 which is NOT close to the original ratio (it's half of the original ratio. Cutting the 10 "in half" gives us…

7 x 5 which we can "flip around" (since either dimension can the length or the width). This gives us a close ratio…

7 x 10 vs. 5 x 7

Second, knowing fraction-to-decimal conversions makes the math a little easier….

7/10 = .7
5/7 = about .71

While I would check the other answers just to be sure, I can't imagine that any of the ratios would be closer than this.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion

PS - rectangles

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:59 am
abhasjha wrote:A project requires a rectangular sheet of cardboard satisfying the following requirement: When the sheet is cut into identical rectangular halves, each of the resulting rectangles has the same ratio of length to width as the original sheet. Which of the following sheets comes closest to satisfying the requirement?

(A) A sheet measuring 7 inches by 10 inches
(B) A sheet measuring 8 inches by 14 inches
(C) A sheet measuring 10 inches by 13 inches
(D) A sheet measuring 3 feet by 5 feet
(E) A sheet measuring 5 feet by 8 feet
Here's an algebraic solution:

Let x be length of the LONG side of the original rectangle
Let y be length of the SHORT side of the original rectangle
Then cut the rectangle into two pieces
Image

We want the resulting rectangles to have the same ratio of length to width as the original sheet.
In other words, we want x/y = y/(x/2)
Cross multiply to get: x²/2 = y²
Multiply both sides by 2 to get: x² = 2y²
Divide both sides by y² to get: x²/y² = 2
Take square root of both sides to get: x/y = √2

IMPORTANT: For the GMAT, everyone should know the following APPROXIMATIONS: √2 ≈ 1.4, √3 ≈ 1.7, √5 ≈ 2.2

So, we know that x/y ≈ 1.4
In other words, the ratio (LONG side)/(SHORT side) ≈ 1.4

Now check the answer choices:

(A) 10/7 = 1 3/7 ≈ 1.4 LOOKS GOOD!
(B) 14/8 = 1 6/8 = 1.75 ELIMINATE
(C) 13/10 = 1.3 ELIMINATE
(D) 5/3 = 1 2/3 ≈ 1.66 ELIMINATE
(E) 8/5 = 1.6 ELIMINATE

Answer: A

Cheers,
Brent
Last edited by Brent@GMATPrepNow on Thu Apr 19, 2018 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by Zoser » Thu Mar 09, 2017 10:09 am
This is possible only if the LENGTH of the original sheet is reduced by half, while the original width STAY THE SAME.
Can you elaborate more on this statement? For example, w=8, L=14 so 8/14 to 8/7, why we flip 8/7 to 7/8?
it should be

Original W/original L compared with New W/new L?
Join the discussion