BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PS inequality

Expert replies
by satish.nagdev » Tue Oct 06, 2009 10:54 pm
If |x| + |y| = -x - y and xy does not equal 0, which of the following must be true?
a) x + y > 0
b) x + y < 0
c) x - y > 0
d) x - y < 0
e) x2 - y2 > 0

I chose D but it's wrong, OA after some discussion. I'm not convinced with explanation given in the source.

Thank,
Satish.
Last edited by satish.nagdev on Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wounded by GMAT but not dead
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by CrackGMAC » Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:38 am
No Clue m8 !!! :!:
Beat The GMAT
Join the discussion

by Katrusya » Wed Oct 07, 2009 11:21 am
I think D is right.
|X|+|Y| must be positive
-x*y can be positive in two ways:
1. x<0 and y>0;
2. x>0 and y<0

Both of these fit into D.
It's D.
I am wondering what could be another way to solve this Q?
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Wed Oct 07, 2009 1:18 pm
What is the source of this question?
Join the discussion

by satish.nagdev » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:42 pm
riteshbindal wrote:What is the source of this question?
Manhattan test

OA is B
Wounded by GMAT but not dead
Join the discussion

Re: PS inequality

by riteshbindal » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:52 pm
satish.nagdev wrote:If |x| + |y| = -x - y and xy does not equal 0, which of the following must be true?
a) x + y > 0
b) x + y < 0
c) x - y > 0
d) x - y < 0
e) x2 - y2 > 0

I chose D but it's wrong, OA after some discussion. I'm not convinced with explanation given in the source.

Thank,
Satish.
Dude... You edited the question. It means whatever question we were solving was incorrect. Please check the question before posting.
Now, this question is as simple as 1 + 2 = 3.
|x| + |y| = -x - y
=> |x| + |y| = -(x+y)
Now |x| and |y| will always be positive so their sum will also be positive.
Hence, -(x+y) > 0
=> x+y<0
That is option B Ans.
Join the discussion

Re: PS inequality

by satish.nagdev » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:56 pm
riteshbindal wrote:
satish.nagdev wrote:If |x| + |y| = -x - y and xy does not equal 0, which of the following must be true?
a) x + y > 0
b) x + y < 0
c) x - y > 0
d) x - y < 0
e) x2 - y2 > 0

I chose D but it's wrong, OA after some discussion. I'm not convinced with explanation given in the source.

Thank,
Satish.
Dude... You edited the question. It means whatever question we were solving was incorrect. Please check the question before posting.
Now, this question is as simple as 1 + 2 = 3.
|x| + |y| = -x - y
=> |x| + |y| = -(x+y)
Now |x| and |y| will always be positive so their sum will also be positive.
Hence, -(x+y) > 0
=> x+y<0
That is option B Ans.
yea sorry actually "-" character didn't appear properly earlier so i just re-entered it.
Wounded by GMAT but not dead
Join the discussion

by riteshbindal » Thu Oct 08, 2009 6:58 pm
Thats fine!
Join the discussion