Defying efforts by policymakers on both sides of the Atlanti

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2010 5:32 am
Location: Classroom courses in Delhi | Bangalore | Video courses across the planet
Thanked: 48 times
Followed by:64 members
GMAT Score:800
FINAL SOLUTION AT ONE PLACE:


Defying efforts by policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic at restraining it, the United States dollar, continuing its rise, reaching its highest level in six years against the German mark.
(A) at restraining it, the United States dollar, continuing its rise, reaching
(B) at restraining it, the rise of the United States dollar continued, to reach
(C) at restraining it, the United States dollar continued rising, and it reached
(D) to restrain it, the United States dollar continued its rise, reaching
(E) to restrain it, the United States dollar is continuing its rise, and to reach

Explanation:

Choices A, B, and C use the wrong idiom 'effort at restraining'; the correct idiom is 'effort to restrain'.

Also, choice A has no verb at all in the overall sentence.

B is wrong because "to reach" should be "reaching" to represent the result of the action in the preceding clause (cause-effect). B is also wrong because the "it" in the first phrase refers to "rise" in the following clause (misplaced modifier).

C is wrong because it uses 'and it reached' even when the two actions are not independent; in this case, the second action can't happen without the first. In such a case, 'and it reached' construction is wrong. This is a clear cause-and-effect sequence. Here, the second (dependent) action has to be written in 'verb-ing' form.

E is wrong because "and to reach" is trying to be parallel with "to restrain", which can't be the case, as the subjects are different in the two cases - 'the restraining' is done by "the policymakers", whereas the word 'reach' refers to the dollar. As a result, the parallel construction distorts the meaning. Also, "is continuing" doesn't make sense either because the action is completed. Furthermore, continuous tenses describe an action at a particular moment, not a period.

D. Correct ... it uses the cause and effect logic correctly by using 'verb-ing' for the effect.
Sandeep Gupta | Asia's only GMAT trainer with multiple 770/800 and a perfect 800/800 score |
Check out my results on www.top-one-percent.com
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 239
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2010 8:40 am
Location: India
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members
GMAT Score:690

by Dean Jones » Thu Dec 15, 2011 10:56 am
ok.

Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

by aditya8062 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:55 am
to Mitch hunt
option C reads :at restraining it, the United States dollar continued rising, and it reached
i have a doubt regarding the expression "at restraining it " .though i know that this expression is in the wrong choice C but i want to know if this expression is otherwise correct .
Mitch i read in one of ur post that preposition sud be followed by the object .my question to u: can "restraining it " be considered "object" to the preposition "at"
my analysis is this sud be fine as "restraining it" seems to me a gerund that can act as a noun
now if my analysis is right plz confirm it .
honestly i had ruled out option C coz i thought i need infinitive "to restrain " to show the intent of the policy makers and not because that "at restraining it " is wrong expression
plz confirm my analysis
thanks and regards
aditya

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:54 am
aditya8062 wrote:to Mitch hunt
option C reads :at restraining it, the United States dollar continued rising, and it reached
i have a doubt regarding the expression "at restraining it " .though i know that this expression is in the wrong choice C but i want to know if this expression is otherwise correct .
Mitch i read in one of ur post that preposition sud be followed by the object .my question to u: can "restraining it " be considered "object" to the preposition "at"
my analysis is this sud be fine as "restraining it" seems to me a gerund that can act as a noun
now if my analysis is right plz confirm it .
honestly i had ruled out option C coz i thought i need infinitive "to restrain " to show the intent of the policy makers and not because that "at restraining it " is wrong expression
plz confirm my analysis
thanks and regards
aditya
A VERBing serving as a noun is called a GERUND.
A gerund can serve as the object of a preposition.
A few examples from the OG12:

SC2: a large amount OF SPENDING
SC18: efficient AT ACQUIRING carbon
SC19: WITH FISHING AND HUNTING
SC20: can sting repeatedly WITHOUT DYING
SC29: the emergence OF PRIZE-STOCK BREEDING
SC33: will cut production BY CLOSING its factories
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

• Page 1 of 1