During their years

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 am
Thanked: 45 times
Followed by:2 members

During their years

by sameerballani » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:30 am
During their years on the frontier, they had numerous pitched battles against Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe, the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.


A. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.

B. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the possibly most skillful enemy in frontier history.

C. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the most skillful enemy, possibly, in frontier history.

D. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly a most skillful enemy in frontier history.

E. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the more skillful enemy in frontier history.

[spoiler]OA:Later[/spoiler]
Please discuss.
Source: — Sentence Correction |

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 83
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 11:27 am
Thanked: 1 times

by abhishek.pati » Fri Jun 17, 2011 4:36 am
During their years on the frontier, they had numerous pitched battles against Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe, the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.


A. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history. correct

B. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the possibly most skillful enemy in frontier history. wrong usage

C. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, the most skillful enemy, possibly, in frontier history. wrong usage , makes no sense.

D. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly a most skillful enemy in frontier history. wrong usage

E. the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the more skillful enemy in frontier history. wrong usage.

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Fri Jun 17, 2011 5:28 am
I found this question is testing our knowledge on articles.

Please use 'the' infront of suprelative or unique entities.

Some guys fought many battles even with X who is the most fierce of all.

+1 for abhishek
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 8:58 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:14 members

by divya23 » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:01 am
imo a

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1035
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:13 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 474 times
Followed by:365 members

by VivianKerr » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:15 am
IMO: A

You would never said "the possibly".

We also use the article "the" before "more" and "most."

Since it's talking about one enemy compared to ALL other enemies, we would use the superlative.
Vivian Kerr
GMAT Rockstar, Tutor
https://www.GMATrockstar.com
https://www.yelp.com/biz/gmat-rockstar-los-angeles

Former Kaplan and Grockit instructor, freelance GMAT content creator, now offering affordable, effective, Skype-tutoring for the GMAT at $150/hr. Contact: [email protected]

Thank you for all the "thanks" and "follows"! :-)

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:31 am
Hi Vivian,

I agree with the OA but can you please help me understand the structure of this sentence.

Op A

During their years on the frontier, they had numerous pitched battles against Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe, the Apaches, including ferocious encounters with the great war chief Victorio, possibly the most skillful enemy in frontier history.

Here my confusion is, if the battle is against these four elements only "Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches" then i believe AND is necessary between the final two elements (Kiowas AND Comanches) here which is missing.

on the other hand, if the battle is between five elements "Lipans, Kickapoos, Kiowas, Comanches - and their most determined foe" then what is the meaning of (- AND)..i'm not able to understand this combination of (hyphen AND)

Please explain!!!

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:46 am
Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 9:52 am
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Hi, actually i rarely saw any hyphen used in SC question so far, most of the time i encountered DASH only and even for this question i initially thought it was DASH but DASH is slightly longer in size, second so far what i know about DASH is,

1) Part between two DASH is modifier
2) DASH MODIFIER COMMA

in this question, in Op A, the construction is same a second one which means AND etc etc is a modifier...that means the sentence will become structurally wrong....my doubt was is the structure of the sentence is correct or not?????

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 10:10 am
atulmangal wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Hi, actually i rarely saw any hyphen used in SC question so far, most of the time i encountered DASH only and even for this question i initially thought it was DASH but DASH is slightly longer in size, second so far what i know about DASH is,

1) Part between two DASH is modifier
2) DASH MODIFIER COMMA

in this question, in Op A, the construction is same a second one which means AND etc etc is a modifier...that means the sentence will become structurally wrong....my doubt was is the structure of the sentence is correct or not?????
Hi,
I understand your point. hyphen is only used in compound words, to make the whole bunch mean as a single word.
Coming to dash, in this case :
IMO, It is used here as a substitute of comma only because adding one more comma to the already plenty commas in the same sentence makes this sentence very awkward and ambiguous too. So, the meaning of the sentence as as you interpreted in the second like five elements.
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

Legendary Member
Posts: 1112
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 77 times
Followed by:49 members

by atulmangal » Fri Jun 17, 2011 6:09 pm
Frankenstein wrote:
atulmangal wrote:
Frankenstein wrote:Hi,
I believe that is a 'dash' and not hyphen. There is a difference between hyphen and dash.
dashes may also be used as a substitute for commas to set off a modifier that NAMES people or things, especially if there is a LIST of such people/things.

So, I think the usage of 'dash' here is as a substitute for comma. But, I don't think we need to worry too much about this usage. Anyway, if you want to know about it, you can refer to Ron's post:
https://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post38846.html
Hi, actually i rarely saw any hyphen used in SC question so far, most of the time i encountered DASH only and even for this question i initially thought it was DASH but DASH is slightly longer in size, second so far what i know about DASH is,

1) Part between two DASH is modifier
2) DASH MODIFIER COMMA

in this question, in Op A, the construction is same a second one which means AND etc etc is a modifier...that means the sentence will become structurally wrong....my doubt was is the structure of the sentence is correct or not?????
Hi,
I understand your point. hyphen is only used in compound words, to make the whole bunch mean as a single word.
Coming to dash, in this case :
IMO, It is used here as a substitute of comma only because adding one more comma to the already plenty commas in the same sentence makes this sentence very awkward and ambiguous too. So, the meaning of the sentence as as you interpreted in the second like five elements.
ohh!!! i looked again and now i got the structure plus your point. My understanding is, here DASH is actually acting as a comma only as u said and the structure is same as

A, B, C, D, and E ----> usual structure

Here, COMMA before and is replaced with DASH in the original question.

Thanks, its always good to discuss conceptual things with you brother.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1448
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 9:55 am
Location: India
Thanked: 375 times
Followed by:53 members

by Frankenstein » Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:01 pm
atulmangal wrote: ohh!!! i looked again and now i got the structure plus your point. My understanding is, here DASH is actually acting as a comma only as u said and the structure is same as

A, B, C, D, and E ----> usual structure

Here, COMMA before and is replaced with DASH in the original question.

Thanks, its always good to discuss conceptual things with you brother.
Hi,
Good to know that you are convinced :)
Your queries stimulate the thought process of others. Keep up the good work!
Cheers!

Things are not what they appear to be... nor are they otherwise

• Page 1 of 1