MGMAT CAT3 CR Doubts

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:41 pm

MGMAT CAT3 CR Doubts

by samyak » Sun May 16, 2010 5:07 am
The recent decline in the employment rate was spurred by predictions of slow economic growth in the coming year. However, those predictions would not have affected the employment rate if it had not been for the lack of capital reserves of major industries. So if major industries increase their capital reserves, the employment rate will not decline in the future.

Which of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the validity of the argument above?

A. Major industry foresaw the drop in employment.
B. Some major industries had appreciable capital reserves.
C. An increase in labor costs could adversely affect the employment rate.
D. The government could pass legislation mandating that major industries set aside a fixed amount as capital reserves every year.
E. The drop in the employment rate was more severe this year than last.

IMO B is the right answer. OA says C. Please help me understand why B is wrong.
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2010 2:32 am
Thanked: 17 times

by this_time_i_will » Sun May 16, 2010 6:11 am
The best answer would be to show that there is other reason for low employment rate and C does precisely that.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 10:41 pm

by samyak » Sun May 16, 2010 7:53 am
My inference:
B says some industries already had capital reserves.So lack of capital reserve is not the reason of recent decline in the employment rate & hence increase in the capital reserve can't stop the decline in employment.

Is it because "some" is mentioned in the option that we are neglecting this reasoning? I thought some can mean all as well.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:08 am
Thanked: 3 times

by bupbebeo » Sun May 16, 2010 8:11 am
samyak wrote:My inference:
B says some industries already had capital reserves.So lack of capital reserve is not the reason of recent decline in the employment rate & hence increase in the capital reserve can't stop the decline in employment.

Is it because "some" is mentioned in the option that we are neglecting this reasoning? I thought some can mean all as well.
An appreciable capital reserve does not mean not lacking it. therefore, B is wrong.