BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Probability clarification

Expert replies
by barcebal » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:31 pm
NOTE: MY QUESTION IS NOT HOW TO SOLVE THIS QUESTION PER SE. I NEED SOMETHING CLARIFIED BUT AM USING THIS QUESTION AS REFERENCE. SEE BELOW.

If a jury of 12 people is to be selected randomly from a pool of 15 potential jurors, and the jury pool consists of 2/3 men and 1/3 women, what is the probability that the jury will comprise at least 2/3 men?
a. 24/91
b. 5/91
c. 2/3
d. 67/91
e. 84/91

So I get that you can solve by doing 1 - probability of 5 women on the jury.
So to do that you'd do ( 5C5 women * 10C7 men ) divided by total possible juries (15C12).
From there you get 1 - ((5!/5!0!)*(10!/7!3!))/(15!/12!3!) or (10!12!3!/7!3!15!)

But I'm wondering why I can't do THIS:
Find probability of getting ONE all-women on jury: 5/15 * 4/14 * 3/13 * 2/12 * 1/11 * 10/10....which becomes (5!10!/15!)
and then multiplying that probability by the total number of juries where this could occur which is essentially saying how can I have 10 men, choose 7. (10!/7!3!)

But this give me a much different answer:

So to recap, the right way gives me 1 - 10!12!3!/7!3!15!
and the wrong way gives me 1 - 10!10!5!/7!3!15!

So what am I misinterpreting on the WRONG way?
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by Jim@StratusPrep » Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:48 pm
What you are calculating is not the probabilities you are claiming. The probability of a 5 woman jury is (10 Choose 7) / (15 choose 12). You are mixing and matching the equations. Please let me know if this doesn't make sense.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:55 pm
I get how to do it the way you explained, but most probabilities have various ways to solve. I'm confused why the following method won't work.

Why can't I say the probability of getting a five-women (don't care which men are on it at this point) jury is:

5/15*4/14*3/13*2/12*1/11*(don't need to multiply the men into it because if you get the 5 women, you will get all the men).

Then to find how many different all-women juries you would multiply the result by 10C7 (10!/7!3!)

Obviously this doesn't work. I don't get why...what am I calculating instead?
Join the discussion

by kullayappayenugula » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:03 pm
Jim can you please suggest an approach to solve the above problem in 2 min??

my solution is some thing like the below but it had lot of calcutations to be performed.

total no. of jury - 15
jury to be selected - 12

out of jury of 15 members - 10 are men and 5 are women.
since the question says the jury should consist 2/3 men we need to have atleast 8 men and no.of women can vary.

i.e
8 men 4 women
9 men 3 women
10 men 2 women


=> 12c8*5c4+12c9*5c3+12c10*5c2/15c12

now I am sure that the above calcutaion will take more than 5 min :-(. Please help.
Last edited by kullayappayenugula on Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:05 pm
i don't know how you can imply 5 women for the conditions given in this question.

Given Pool: Men=10, Women=5
Required Jury: Men=at least 8 (possible 8,9,10, AND NOT 11,12 as we are limited to ONLY 10 men from Pool) and Women=possible 4,3,2,1,0

as you see women can be at most 4 not 5. This is important, and I don't know if you have this question solved and answered to verify your answer, but I will solve it now.

In your *wondered* solution you make the same mistake of 5 women instead of considering 4 women at most. Anyways i'm directing myself to solve this >>
If a jury of 12 people is to be selected randomly from a pool of 15 potential jurors, and the jury pool consists of 2/3 men and 1/3 women, what is the probability that the jury will comprise at least 2/3 men?
a. 24/91
b. 5/91
c. 2/3
d. 67/91
e. 84/91
The required Probability (8M&4W + 9M&3W + 10M&2W) -> 10C8*5C4/15C12 + 10C9*5C3/15C12 + 10C10*5C2/15C12 = 45*5/455 + 10*10/455 + 1*10/455 = 335/455 = 67*5/91*5 = 67/91

Correct answer is d

barcebal wrote:NOTE: MY QUESTION IS NOT HOW TO SOLVE THIS QUESTION PER SE. I NEED SOMETHING CLARIFIED BUT AM USING THIS QUESTION AS REFERENCE. SEE BELOW.

If a jury of 12 people is to be selected randomly from a pool of 15 potential jurors, and the jury pool consists of 2/3 men and 1/3 women, what is the probability that the jury will comprise at least 2/3 men?
a. 24/91
b. 5/91
c. 2/3
d. 67/91
e. 84/91

So I get that you can solve by doing 1 - probability of 5 women on the jury.
So to do that you'd do ( 5C5 women * 10C7 men ) divided by total possible juries (15C12).
From there you get 1 - ((5!/5!0!)*(10!/7!3!))/(15!/12!3!) or (10!12!3!/7!3!15!)

But I'm wondering why I can't do THIS:
Find probability of getting ONE all-women on jury: 5/15 * 4/14 * 3/13 * 2/12 * 1/11 * 10/10....which becomes (5!10!/15!)
and then multiplying that probability by the total number of juries where this could occur which is essentially saying how can I have 10 men, choose 7. (10!/7!3!)

But this give me a much different answer:

So to recap, the right way gives me 1 - 10!12!3!/7!3!15!
and the wrong way gives me 1 - 10!10!5!/7!3!15!

So what am I misinterpreting on the WRONG way?
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by pemdas » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:08 pm
kullayappayenugula wrote:Jim can you please suggest an approach to solve the above problem in 2 min??
my sol. took me less than 2 min-s and i spent time more describing process in the thread, otherwise combo wraps+quick calc=<2 min-s
Success doesn't come overnight!
Join the discussion

by barcebal » Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:12 pm
I still don't see why you can't calculate the odds/probability of getting an all-women jury

5/15 * 4/14 * 3/13 * 2/12 * 1/11

And then finding number of different combinations of 7 men from a field of 10.
Join the discussion