BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Printwell's Ink Jet

Expert replies
by LulaBrazilia » Fri Feb 21, 2014 6:41 pm
Printwell's Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use. Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased. Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers. Unfortunately, Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer. Thus, despite the increase in printer sales, the Ink Jet Division must be contributing less to the company's profits than it used to.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, and Printwell's printers only accept Printwell's ink cartridges.

(B) Unlike some competing companies, Printwell sells all of its printers through retailers, and these retailers' costs account for a sizable proportion of the printers' ultimate retail price.

(C) Some printer manufacturers have been forced to reduce the sale price of their ink-jet printers even more than Printwell has.

(D) In the past year, no competing manufacturer of ink-jet printers has had as great an increase as Printwell in unit sales of printers.

(E) In the past year, sales of Printwell's ink-jet printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer made by Printwell
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Patrick_GMATFix » Fri Feb 21, 2014 6:53 pm
The full solution below is taken from the GMATFix App.

Image

-Patrick
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion

by Abhishek009 » Sun Feb 23, 2014 7:06 am
LulaBrazilia wrote:Printwell's Ink Jet Division manufactures ink-jet printers and the ink cartridges they use. Sales of its ink-jet printers have increased. Monthly revenues from those sales, however, have not increased, because competition has forced Printwell to cut the prices of its printers. Unfortunately, Printwell has been unable to bring down the cost of manufacturing a printer. Thus, despite the increase in printer sales, the Ink Jet Division must be contributing less to the company's profits than it used to.
Sale of Inkjet Printers Increased , but Revenue has not increased since it has cut prices as a result of Price Competition from its Competitors.

Cost of Manufacturing can not be reduced , hence Inkjet Printers is Contributing less than it used to.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

Our Prime target here is attack the red highlighted part.

(A) Ink-jet printers in regular use frequently need new ink cartridges, and Printwell's printers only accept Printwell's ink cartridges.

Regular inkjet users prefer Printwell's Ink cartridges , hence sales of the product is accepted to remain stable for sometime.

Hence revenue from this source is expected to remain in Proportion to the Sales.

(B) Unlike some competing companies, Printwell sells all of its printers through retailers, and these retailers' costs account for a sizable proportion of the printers' ultimate retail price.

Out of scope an irrelevant outright.

(C) Some printer manufacturers have been forced to reduce the sale price of their ink-jet printers even more than Printwell has.

Out of scope.

(D) In the past year, no competing manufacturer of ink-jet printers has had as great an increase as Printwell in unit sales of printers.

Out of scope.

(E) In the past year, sales of Printwell's ink-jet printers have increased more than sales of any other type of printer made by Printwell.

We don't have sufficient Information to claim the same....


Thus IMO (A) ...
Abhishek
Join the discussion

by [email protected] » Mon Feb 24, 2014 6:04 pm
Hi Lula Brazilia,

This prompt is a WEAKEN question. We'll need to understand the logic behind the prompt and then ATTACK that logic. It's worth noting that this prompt is very specifically worded to include some details that the average Test Taker might miss.

The Facts:
-Printwell's Ink Jet Division manufactures printers AND ink cartridges for those printers.
-Sales of their printers have INCREASED, but monthly revenues have NOT INCREASED.
-Sales price of their printers have DECREASED (a response due to competition); Printwell is UNABLE to decrease the cost of manufacturing a printer.

The Conclusion:
The Ink Jet DIVISION MUST be contributing LESS to company's profits than it used to.

The Logic:
Even though sales of the printers are UP, the price is DOWN, so the INK JET DIVISION is contributing less profits than before. This logic holds true if the ENTIRE INK JET DIVISION has seen a drop in profits.

To weaken the logic, we need to find an answer that tells us how/why the INK JET DIVISION is NOT down AS A WHOLE. The information about the printers makes it likely that that correct answer will tell us how the DIVISION is actually making profits BEYOND the printer sales.

The correct answer A tells us how the DIVISION is making money (and likely a profit) on something besides its printers.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image
Join the discussion