BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Princeton Review Question

Expert replies
by lpycharles » Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:05 am
Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.


that they can appeal to when their cases are

to which to appeal after their cases have been

for appealing if their case has been

to which they can appeal if their case is

that their cases can appeal, if they have been
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by stop@800 » Mon Sep 29, 2008 7:47 am
My guess is for option A


"their case can appeal" is incorrect
so E is out

D
"which they can" is extra
case is || courts => gap


C
case has been decided in lower courts
courts will require cases


B
"which to" is not needed


Also "appeal to" is looking more logical to me


Whats the OA??
Join the discussion


• Page 1 of 1