BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PRINCESTONE-cr house

Expert replies
by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 2:06 am
Ella: The house on Elm Street is a smart investment and we should buy it immediately. The real estate market is volatile, and since current prices are relatively low, we should take advantage of the owner's financial trouble and make a low offer today.

Cindy: We should rent a house while we save enough money for a big down payment. If we don't put enough money down, our mortgage payments will be too high.

Which of the following, if true, would offer the most support for Ella's argument in light of Cindy's criticism?


A big down payment does not protect against rising interest rates.

The risk of making an immediate offer is small if current prices are relatively low.

Some investors in volatile real estate markets have made enormous profits by timing wisely the resale of their investments.

Investing in real estate when prices are low outweighs any advantage gained by having a comparatively low mortgage payment.

If the owner's financial trouble caused the price of the house to drop below market value, the investment would almost certainly bring a profit.
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by jube » Sun Jul 04, 2010 4:35 am
IMO D.

Cindy's counterargument seems to be along the lines of the investment not being profitable (irrespective of the low prices, etc.) if they end up paying huge mortgage payments.

What is the OA? Thanks!
Join the discussion

by 786 » Sun Jul 04, 2010 6:40 am
D and E are close .
I will go with E .

Ella says : we should take advantage of the owner’s financial trouble .
E says : If drop in price is due to financial trouble , then Profit is almost sure .

OA ?
Join the discussion

by outreach » Sun Jul 04, 2010 11:08 am
ella: prefers investment because market prices r low
cindy: is worried abt high mortgage payment if high down payment is not made

D should be correct
-------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
General blog
https://amarnaik.wordpress.com
MBA blog
https://amarrnaik.blocked/
Join the discussion

by adi_800 » Wed Jul 07, 2010 2:17 am
Cindy's criticism is if we don't pay enough down payments, then mortgage payments will be too high and due to this there wont be any advantage in buying the house.
D says that the advantages gained by investing when the prices are low outweighs advantage gained by having a comparatively low mortgage payment.

So, D supports the argument..
Join the discussion

by dream700 » Thu Jul 08, 2010 3:21 am
between D and E... E is flawed because it fails to tell anything about "mortgage payments "...it might be that the profit from purchasing the house are huge...but what if the losses that can be incurred through mortgage payments are even greater?

so go with D.

Deutsch750
Join the discussion

by deepshi291 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:25 pm
I will go with A..
A big down payment does not protect against rising interest rates - directly makes light of Cindy's criticism.

Experts please explain..
Join the discussion

by pradeepkaushal9518 » Sun Jul 11, 2010 11:06 pm
no deepshi A is not correct even it is not oa.

here we are not talking about interest rates
Join the discussion

by deepshi291 » Mon Jul 12, 2010 12:07 am
pradeepkaushal9518 wrote:no deepshi A is not correct even it is not oa.

here we are not talking about interest rates

Thanks..Got it :) Was feeling a little foggy in head earlier, re-read the argument..it's D
Join the discussion