BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

prime factors problem

Expert replies
by akhilsaini2001 » Wed May 26, 2010 1:19 am
if x and y are positive integers, is 2x/y an integer?
1. some factors of y are also factors of x.
2. all prime factors of y are also prime factors of x.


i think the answer is B BUT the answer is E, but i am not convinced by the reasoning i got for it.

the book's explaination says:-
the second statement indicates that all distinct prime factors of y are also factors of x. this means that if y has at least one of a given prime number as a factor, then x also has at least one of that prime factor. so statement 2 tells us only that at least one prime factor is shared. so we dont have an absolute yes or no.

my explaination:-
second statement says all prime factors of x are factors of y so all factors of y get cancelled with those of x. so we are left with few factors of x and 2 in numerator and nothing in denominator which makes it a integer . so B is the answer.

please help me get the correct thinking path. cos of course book cannot be wrong.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by gmatmachoman » Wed May 26, 2010 2:00 am
akhilsaini2001 wrote:if x and y are positive integers, is 2x/y an integer?
1. some factors of y are also factors of x.
2. all prime factors of y are also prime factors of x.


i think the answer is B BUT the answer is E, but i am not convinced by the reasoning i got for it.

the book's explaination says:-
the second statement indicates that all distinct prime factors of y are also factors of x. this means that if y has at least one of a given prime number as a factor, then x also has at least one of that prime factor. so statement 2 tells us only that at least one prime factor is shared. so we dont have an absolute yes or no.

my explaination:-
second statement says all prime factors of x are factors of y so all factors of y get cancelled with those of x. so we are left with few factors of x and 2 in numerator and nothing in denominator which makes it a integer . so B is the answer.

please help me get the correct thinking path. cos of course book cannot be wrong.



I prefer plugging in a Number

Let X= 42 = 2*3 * 7

Y = 63 = 3^2 * 7.

Now as per st s all prime factors of Y are also prime fcators of X. But are they form a integer when 2x/y?? No

So it doesnt give a absolute yes / No.

Actually u gave thought only about the prime factors, but ignored the total number of factors of those prime numbers!
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed May 26, 2010 9:12 am
This is a question of semantics - when it says all distinct prime factors the book does not take into account the number of them, just the identity. Therefore if y is 9 x can be 3 and thus the additional 3 on the bottom would not be cancelled out. I have never been truly convinced by their definition of all but you have to go with it becuase they write the test. The thing to learn is that all doesn't talk to the number of things, just the identity. Hope this helps.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Wed May 26, 2010 1:59 pm
@akhilsaini2001,

Welcome to BTG forums

The book's explanation is right as Becky demonstrated. This question is written with an official question for template. Maybe someone else will be able to locate that question. Essentially the GMAT writers who wrote the original question (that this is based on) use slightly different language. Something closer to what's below:

(1) Every factor of p is also a factor of q

(2) Every prime factor of p is also a prime factor of q

every might have been "each". Either way, in the official version, a singular pronoun is used (instead of "all" as this question uses). Using a singular pronoun makes the question clearer by emphasizing that we're dealing with each prime (for instance 3, 5) and not all primes put together (for instance 3^2 or 5^2).

I tried to locate the question but it's taking too long. If I find it i'll edit this post.

-Patrick
Join the discussion

by tpr-becky » Wed May 26, 2010 3:41 pm
I believe the question was removed from the 12th edition but it is in the 11th edition.
Becky
Master GMAT Instructor
The Princeton Review
Irvine, CA
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Wed May 26, 2010 6:21 pm
tpr-becky wrote:I believe the question was removed from the 12th edition but it is in the 11th edition.
Impressive memory!! The question I was referring to is #125 DS in the OG11

If r and s are positive integers, is r/s an integer?
(1) Every factor of s is also a factor of r.
(2) Every prime factor of s is also a prime factor of r.


Thanks for the tip Becky :-)
Join the discussion

by akhilsaini2001 » Thu May 27, 2010 5:05 am
thanks guys... it was prompt help.. really appreciate...
Join the discussion

by Patrick_GMATFix » Thu May 27, 2010 5:35 am
You're welcome.
  • Ask me about tutoring.
Join the discussion