BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem
TTP OnDemand GMAT Video Course
Featured Course

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.

  • 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
  • 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
  • 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
  • 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
  • 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
  • TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
  • 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
  • OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
  • Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
  • MBA Admissions Consulting now available
  • 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
  • 200,000+ students served
  • 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★ 5.0 (559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start then $127/mo
Start Free 5-Day Trial Read 559 Reviews →

tough tough SC modifiers Q

Expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times
by san2009 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:40 am
What, if anything, is wrong with this sentence?

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Source: — Sentence Correction |
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Sun Aug 01, 2010 9:54 am
I believe it's a run-on sentence.

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs.

"if administered repeatedly to members of a population" is an adverb, so it can be removed from the main clause. So the bold part is what the main clause appears to be, and I don't think they should be combined together with conjunction "and".
Yep.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:02 am
thats what i thought
but its actually correct
i can't get my head around ", and one " part of the sentence
source is knewton
instructors pls help!
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1460
Joined: Tue Dec 29, 2009 1:28 amFollowed by: 7 members
Thanked: 135 times

by selango » Sun Aug 01, 2010 10:18 am
If "and" is not used it ll become the runon sentence.
--Anand--
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 171
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2010 1:02 am
Thanked: 1 times

by san2009 » Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:27 am
", and one reason is suggested" is correct?

shouldn't there be a "that" in there?
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pmFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 127 times

by gmat_perfect » Sun Aug 01, 2010 12:34 pm
san2009 wrote:What, if anything, is wrong with this sentence?

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs.
I think the sentence is okay in the way as it is.

Many antibiotics can become ineffective if [they are]administered repeatedly to members of a population, and one reason is suggested by the finding that there are bacteria with special enzymes that can deactivate certain antibiotics in all countries but those that have reported that they have had limited access to these drugs

Think about another sentence:

Although eradicated in the United States, polio continues elsewhere and could be brought...

=> Here, Although [it is ] eradicated in the USA, polio.

In the same way the sentence is correct.

Again:

Independent clause + COMMA + FANBOYS + Independent clause is correct.


We can wait for a reply from the instructors.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1172
Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:20 pmFollowed by: 4 members
Thanked: 74 times

by uwhusky » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:17 pm
gmat_perfect wrote: Think about another sentence:

Although eradicated in the United States, polio continues elsewhere and could be brought...

=> Here, Although [it is ] eradicated in the USA, polio.

In the same way the sentence is correct.

Again:

Independent clause + COMMA + FANBOYS + Independent clause is correct.


We can wait for a reply from the instructors.
"Although eradicated in the United States" is NOT an independent clause. It lacks subject. It's actually a modifier, and not the same parallel example to question at hand.
Yep.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 9:38 pmFollowed by: 14 members
Thanked: 127 times

by gmat_perfect » Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:29 pm
uwhusky wrote:
gmat_perfect wrote: Think about another sentence:

Although eradicated in the United States, polio continues elsewhere and could be brought...

=> Here, Although [it is ] eradicated in the USA, polio.

In the same way the sentence is correct.

Again:

Independent clause + COMMA + FANBOYS + Independent clause is correct.


We can wait for a reply from the instructors.
"Although eradicated in the United States" is NOT an independent clause. It lacks subject. It's actually a modifier, and not the same parallel example to question at hand.
One thing:

I did not say that "although eradicated..." is an IC. I have just shown that "although eradicated"---> Although it is eradicated, and the same thing has been applied in the said sentence.

I have seen this pattern in NewYork Times and in Washington Post.

Thanks.
Top
Join the discussion
Log in to postLogin with Googleuse password
QUOTE IN REPLY
Post new topic Locked
• Page 1 of 1