• NEW! FREE Beat The GMAT Quizzes
Hundreds of Questions Highly Detailed Reporting Expert Explanations
• 7 CATs FREE!
If you earn 100 Forum Points

Engage in the Beat The GMAT forums to earn
100 points for $49 worth of Veritas practice GMATs FREE VERITAS PRACTICE GMAT EXAMS Earn 10 Points Per Post Earn 10 Points Per Thanks Earn 10 Points Per Upvote ## Prescription medications ##### This topic has 6 expert replies and 14 member replies Goto page • 1, • 2 ## Prescription medications ## Timer 00:00 ## Your Answer A B C D E ## Global Stats Difficult According to a recent study of consumer spending on prescription medications, increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounts for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised
very little.

A. heavily accounts for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came B. heavily were what accounted for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year; the remainder of the increase coming

C. heavily accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming D. heavily, accounting for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, while the remainder of the increase came

E. heavily, which accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, with the remainder of it coming My take A: s/v agreement error. increases 'account' for the increase and not 'accounts' D: 'accounting' introduces a sentence fragment E: 'which' and 'with' again introduce sentence fragments and need to be independent clauses It's B vs C What is wrong with B? Should 'coming' be replaced with 'came'? In C, don't we need a semicolon after 'year'? _________________ Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck) ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15254 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Top Reply richachampion wrote: GMATGuruNY wrote: Note that an absolute phrase does NOT have to include a participle. The structure of an absolute phrase is as follows: COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIER. In many cases, the modifier will include a participle (VERBed or VERBing). In some cases, no participle will be included. SC100 in the OG12: The stars are in motion, some of them at tremendous speeds. Here, the absolute phrase in blue does not include a participle. Thanks. Mr. Hunt, Your approach is very succinct and student friendly. You teach something that the people can understand , remember, and implement in real exam. This is a little bit confusing for me. Then how to differentiate between an absolute phrase and an appositive. I think both follow the structure = COMMA + NOUN + NOUN MODIFIER An appositive serves to explain or define the immediately PRECEDING NOUN OR NOUN PHRASE. An absolute phrase serves to modify the PRECEDING SUBJECT AND VERB. A helpful clue: In an absolute phrase, the noun after the comma will generally be either PRECEDED BY A POSSESSIVE (its, their, his, her) or FOLLOWED BY of them. From GMATPrep: Europa has long been considered far too cold to support life, its 60 square miles of water thought to be frozen from top to bottom. Here, the noun after the comma is preceded by a possessive (its). It is clear from context that the phrase in blue serves not to define the immediately preceding noun (life) but to modify the preceding SUBJECT AND VERB, expressing why EUROPA HAS LONG BEEN CONSIDERED far too cold to support life. Thus, the phrase in blue is not an appositive but an absolute phrase. Also from GMATPrep: An overwhelming proportion of women work, many of them in middle management. Here, the noun after the comma is followed by of them. It is clear from context that the phrase in blue serves to modify the preceding SUBJECT AND VERB, expressing where WOMEN WORK. Thus, the phrase in blue is an absolute phrase. SC42 in the OG12: Scientists have recently discovered what could be the largest and oldest living organism on Earth, a giant fungus that is an interwoven filigree of mushrooms. Here, the noun after the comma is NOT preceded by a possessive or followed by of them. It is clear from context that the phrase in blue serves to modify not the preceding subject and verb but the immediately preceding NOUN PHRASE, explaining what could be the largest and oldest living organism on Earth. Thus, the phrase in blue is an appositive. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 14 Apr 2009 Posted: 976 messages Followed by: 12 members Upvotes: 49 Test Date: 18.10.2012 Target GMAT Score: 760 GMAT Score: 700 zaarathelab wrote: According to a recent study of consumer spending on prescription medications, increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounts for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised
very little.

A. heavily accounts for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of which came B. heavily were what accounted for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year; the remainder of the increase coming

C. heavily accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming D. heavily, accounting for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, while the remainder of the increase came

E. heavily, which accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, with the remainder of it coming IMO C Source? _________________ Regards, Pranay Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 10 Jan 2010 Posted: 217 messages Followed by: 1 members Upvotes: 7 Target GMAT Score: 700+ Source GMATPrep pls provide explanations _________________ Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck) Legendary Member Joined 14 Apr 2009 Posted: 976 messages Followed by: 12 members Upvotes: 49 Test Date: 18.10.2012 Target GMAT Score: 760 GMAT Score: 700 A. Which here refers to last year and thus, changes the meaning of sentence. Ideally, which should refer to billion dollar increase. B. were what accounted sounds awkward, illogical and is incorrect. The repetition of verb were distorts the sentence construction. C. The error in A is eliminated here by replacing which with increase. D. accounting, a present participle preceded by comma, modifies the subject of previous clause, which is drugs in this case. We have to modify the increase in revenue not the drugs. E. Which does not have proper antecedent. Hope it helps and please let me know other means by which options can be eliminated. _________________ Regards, Pranay Legendary Member Joined 26 Jul 2011 Posted: 2789 messages Followed by: 43 members Upvotes: 206 Target GMAT Score: 700+ GMAT Score: 640 IMO:C Parallel Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts Joined 10 Jan 2010 Posted: 217 messages Followed by: 1 members Upvotes: 7 Target GMAT Score: 700+ I got it. B: We don't need a semicolon after last year because what follows it lacks a main verb and is not a n independent clause - Only independent clauses can be separated by a semi-colon Hence C _________________ Success = Max(Hardwork) + Min(Luck) Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 15 Dec 2015 Posted: 79 messages Followed by: 1 members GMAT Score: 750 Isn't C a run on sentence. I mean what kind of a modifier is 'the remainder of the increase coming'. Is the question correct and is it really from OG? ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15254 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Nina1987 wrote: Isn't C a run on sentence. I mean what kind of a modifier is 'the remainder of the increase coming'. Is the question correct and is it really from OG? The SC above is SC52 in the OG16. OA: Increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounted for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised very little.
The modifier in blue is an absolute phrase.
An absolute phrase is composed of COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIERS.
Its purpose is to provide context for the preceding clause.
Here, the portion in blue explains UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending. Conveyed meaning: As increases in sales of the 50 most heavily advertised drugs accounted for half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending, the remainder of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending was coming from sales of drugs that were less heavily advertised. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts Joined 15 Dec 2015 Posted: 79 messages Followed by: 1 members GMAT Score: 750 Thanks NYGuru! I must confess though that I have very rarely seen the absolute phrase occurring at the end of a sentence and feels quite weird to my ear when it does so! I think it is more common for it to begin a sentence. Is it a recent (a few decades old) addition to grammar books or has it been prevalent in formal language for centuries? Thanks again Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts Joined 06 Jan 2016 Posted: 28 messages GMATGuruNY wrote: Nina1987 wrote: Isn't C a run on sentence. I mean what kind of a modifier is 'the remainder of the increase coming'. Is the question correct and is it really from OG? The SC above is SC52 in the OG16. OA: Increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounted for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised very little.
The modifier in blue is an absolute phrase.
An absolute phrase is composed of COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIERS.
Its purpose is to provide context for the preceding clause.
Here, the portion in blue explains UNDER WHAT CIRCUMSTANCES increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending. Conveyed meaning: As increases in sales of the 50 most heavily advertised drugs accounted for half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending, the remainder of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending was coming from sales of drugs that were less heavily advertised. Mitch, I am not questioning the OA. But C uses the invalid 'preposition + Noun + ING' construction,right? EG: I have evidence of my brother stealing the cookies. The sentence implies I have evidence of my brother (not of him stealing the cookies). In the same way 'reminder of increase coming' is just 'reminder of increase + Modifiers' Could you please let me know where I am going wrong? Thanks in advance. ### GMAT/MBA Expert GMAT Instructor Joined 25 May 2010 Posted: 15254 messages Followed by: 1861 members Upvotes: 13060 GMAT Score: 790 Alchemist14 wrote: Mitch, I am not questioning the OA. But C uses the invalid 'preposition + Noun + ING' construction,right? EG: I have evidence of my brother stealing the cookies. The sentence implies I have evidence of my brother (not of him stealing the cookies). In the same way 'reminder of increase coming' is just 'reminder of increase + Modifiers' Could you please let me know where I am going wrong? Thanks in advance. The two structures look the same but function differently. I have evidence of my brother stealing the cookies. Here, the VERBing modifier (stealing) refers to the object of of (my brother). As a result, the following meaning is conveyed: I have evidence of my BROTHER. Which brother? My brother stealing the cookies . But the intended meaning is not that I have evidence of my brother but that I have evidence of the STEALING. For this reason, the sentence above is invalid. OA: the remainder of the increase coming from sales Here, we know from context that the VERBing modifier (coming) refers NOT to the object of of but to the noun BEFORE of (the remainder). Conveyed meaning: The REMAINDER of the increase was COMING from sales. This meaning is perfectly logical. Note the following: PREPOSITION + NOUN + VERBing can be a valid structure even if the VERBing refers to the object of the preposition. An OA in GMATPrep: With the cost plummeting, many people are now using their mobile phones. Here, plummeting serves to modify the cost (object of the preposition with). In some cases, PREPOSITION + NOUN + VERBing will yield an illogical meaning. Eliminate an answer choice with this structure only if the intended meaning is not conveyed. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 21 Jul 2015 Posted: 698 messages Followed by: 25 members Upvotes: 32 Test Date: âˆž â†’ Target GMAT Score: 760 GMAT Score: 740 GMATGuruNY wrote: The SC above is SC52 in the OG16. OA: Increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounted for almost half of the$20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised very little.
The modifier in blue is an absolute phrase.
An absolute phrase is composed of COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIERS.
Sir, What I know about absolute phrases is this =

Absolute Modifiers are adverbial in nature =

They always modify the preceding clause unlike the appositives that can modify both noun and clause(in case of abstract noun modifier)
Their structure is Noun + Participial,

but I am unable to find the participial part here. Please guide me. Thanks!

_________________
R I C H A,
My GMAT Journey: 470 â†’ 720 â†’ 740
Target Score: 760+
richacrunch2@gmail.com
1. Press thanks if you like my solution.
2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!)

### GMAT/MBA Expert

GMAT Instructor
Joined
25 May 2010
Posted:
15254 messages
Followed by:
1861 members
13060
GMAT Score:
790
richachampion wrote:
GMATGuruNY wrote:
The SC above is SC52 in the OG16.
OA: Increases in the sales of the 50 drugs that were advertised most heavily accounted for almost half of the $20.8 billion increase in drug spending last year, the remainder of the increase coming from sales of the 9,850 prescription medicines that companies did not advertise or advertised very little. The modifier in blue is an absolute phrase. An absolute phrase is composed of COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIERS. Sir, What I know about absolute phrases is this = Absolute Modifiers are adverbial in nature = They always modify the preceding clause unlike the appositives that can modify both noun and clause(in case of abstract noun modifier) Their structure is Noun + Participial, but I am unable to find the participial part here. Please guide me. Thanks! coming = participle. Note that an absolute phrase does NOT have to include a participle. The structure of an absolute phrase is as follows: COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIER. In many cases, the modifier will include a participle (VERBed or VERBing). In some cases, no participle will be included. SC100 in the OG12: The stars are in motion, some of them at tremendous speeds. Here, the absolute phrase in blue does not include a participle. _________________ Mitch Hunt Private Tutor for the GMAT and GRE GMATGuruNY@gmail.com If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "UPVOTE" icon. Available for tutoring in NYC and long-distance. For more information, please email me at GMATGuruNY@gmail.com. Student Review #1 Student Review #2 Student Review #3 Free GMAT Practice Test How can you improve your test score if you don't know your baseline score? Take a free online practice exam. Get started on achieving your dream score today! Sign up now. Legendary Member Joined 21 Jul 2015 Posted: 698 messages Followed by: 25 members Upvotes: 32 Test Date: âˆž â†’ Target GMAT Score: 760 GMAT Score: 740 GMATGuruNY wrote: Note that an absolute phrase does NOT have to include a participle. The structure of an absolute phrase is as follows: COMMA + NOUN + MODIFIER. In many cases, the modifier will include a participle (VERBed or VERBing). In some cases, no participle will be included. SC100 in the OG12: The stars are in motion, some of them at tremendous speeds. Here, the absolute phrase in blue does not include a participle. Thanks. Mr. Hunt, Your approach is very succinct and student friendly. You teach something that the people can understand , remember, and implement in real exam. This is a little bit confusing for me. Then how to differentiate between an absolute phrase and an appositive. I think both follow the structure = COMMA + NOUN + NOUN MODIFIER _________________ R I C H A, My GMAT Journey: 470 â†’ 720 â†’ 740 Target Score: 760+ richacrunch2@gmail.com 1. Press thanks if you like my solution. 2. Contact me if you are not improving. (No Free Lunch!) • Magoosh Study with Magoosh GMAT prep Available with Beat the GMAT members only code • Award-winning private GMAT tutoring Register now and save up to$200

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP Quant

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Veritas GMAT Class
Experience Lesson 1 Live Free

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Trial & Practice Exam
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Free Practice Test & Review
How would you score if you took the GMAT

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 5 Day FREE Trial
Study Smarter, Not Harder

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• FREE GMAT Exam
Know how you'd score today for \$0

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• 1 Hour Free
BEAT THE GMAT EXCLUSIVE

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

• Get 300+ Practice Questions

Available with Beat the GMAT members only code

### Top First Responders*

1 Jay@ManhattanReview 71 first replies
2 Brent@GMATPrepNow 67 first replies
3 GMATGuruNY 43 first replies
4 Ian Stewart 27 first replies
5 Scott@TargetTestPrep 18 first replies
* Only counts replies to topics started in last 30 days
See More Top Beat The GMAT Members

### Most Active Experts

1 Scott@TargetTestPrep

Target Test Prep

221 posts
2 Max@Math Revolution

Math Revolution

93 posts
3 Brent@GMATPrepNow

GMAT Prep Now Teacher

90 posts
4 Jay@ManhattanReview

Manhattan Review

73 posts
5 GMATGuruNY

The Princeton Review Teacher

66 posts
See More Top Beat The GMAT Experts