BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prep- Geometry

Expert replies
Source: — Problem Solving |

by codesnooker » Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:49 am
Actually there is a theorem in Geometry (don't know really exist or not but I have proved it myself, didn't bother to search it on net).

You can check the link to view more on this: https://www.beatthegmat.com/coordinate-s ... 12489.html

Concept: The distance between two point will we same on interchanging the values of x-coordinate and y-coordinate of a point and keeping fixed the other point.

Your question is somewhat same and near to this concept; only the thing is the it is asked in reverse order.

Since both PO and QO are radii of circle, therefore distance would be same. Now if the distance is same we are using (0, 0) as the center or intersecting point for both lines then we can easily swap the coordinates.

So, it means you need not to do any calculation at all, just swap the coordinates and reverse the sign as it in upper half of the coordinate system.

Hope it helps....
Join the discussion

by sudhir3127 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:23 am
please do search appropriately before posting a new question, it unnecessarily takes the space and time of lot of posters.

the question has been answered before..

thanks
Join the discussion

by jslavi01 » Wed Jul 16, 2008 6:27 am
Here is the proof in a nutshell:

You have two isoceles right triangles after drawing an imaginary line through P and Q.

The two new triangles are
(0,0), (-sqrt(3),1) and (1,0)
and
(0,0), (s,t) and (1,0)

The length of one side of the triangle is 1. The hypotenuese is sqrt 3.

Therefore the length of the other side is 1.

S, therefore, is equal to 1 .
Join the discussion

incorrect assumption by jslavi

by seweryn » Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:16 am
You cannot assume you will have two isoceles triangles after the imaginary line draw between the points, if this were the case then for the triangle on the left, you would not have two known sides of radical 3 and 1, using the theory of Pythagorus, we know that the length of the hypotenuse for the left triangle formed after drawing a line connecting the two points is 2.

Because all radii are equal, the other radii must be 2 as well, using the theorem again, we find that the connecting line must be equal to radical 8, simplified to 2 radical 2.

Now given that from point P to the y axis is radical 3, we solve for what is needed to be added to radical 3 to equate to 2 radical 2, in decimal form, for accuracy, we find that radical 3 (1.73205) plus X = 2 radical 2 (2.82842), solve for X, X=1.0963, or ~1.

DO NOT assume two isoceles triangles are formed, just because it works out once, does not hold true always.
Join the discussion

Re: Prep- Geometry

by parallel_chase » Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:34 am
agemroy wrote:Image


Shouldnt the answer be sqrt(2)?? How is it 1?
Here is a two step solution to this problem.

We know from the figure that angle formed at the origin is 90.

Therefore, PQ is perpendicular on ST

Slope of line from orgin to point PQ is -1/sqrt3

Hence slope of line from origin to ST is sqrt3/1

Therefore point S is 1.

Let me know if you have any doubts.
Join the discussion

by agemroy » Wed Jul 16, 2008 9:47 pm
Hey,

That was helpful. Dont know how i missed out the slope concept?

Thanks
Join the discussion