BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Prep 13

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by jackcrystal » Thu Nov 20, 2008 5:39 am
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:26 am
X-Y > -2 => x>-2 +Y

X-2y<-6 => x<-6+2Y => -x> 6-2Y

Add them 0 >4-Y => y>4


x>-2 +Y = > X must be positive since Y >4
so C
Last edited by Tryingmybest on Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:31 am
Tryingmybest wrote:X-Y > -2 => x>-2 +Y

X-2y<-6 => x<-6+2Y => -x> 6-2Y

Add them 0 >4-Y => y>4

This means X> 4 so C
X> 4 , how did you find this ?
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by Tryingmybest » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:33 am
Corrected now. But still answer is C .
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:35 am
Tryingmybest wrote:Corrected now. But still answer is C .
Big Brother is watching you. :)
Last edited by logitech on Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by dilbert » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:47 am
C


explanation:

for xy>0 you need both x,y with same sign (i.e. both positive or both negative).

(1) x-y > -2 ==> x+2>y
this doesn't lead to x,y with same sign, so A and D are out.

(2) x-2y<-6 ==> x+6<2y
again, doesn't lead to x,y with same sign, so B is out.

need to eliminate C, so let's check both statements together.

start with (2):
x-2y<-6
x+6<2y
x+2+4<2y

use y<x+2 (from 1), and you have:
x+2+4<2y
y+4<x+2+4<2y
y+4<2y
4<2y
2<y

so you have:
y>2

and
x+2>y
x+2>y>2
x+2>2
x>0

so both x, y are positive, thus xy>0 .
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:57 am
dilbert wrote:C

so you have:
y>2


x>0

so both x, y are positive, thus xy>0 .
Dilbert, check your calculations. Be careful with inserting one ineq into another. According your solution

y>2 and x>0 BUT y=3 and x=1 WILL NOT satisfy both of equations.
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:17 am
In case you want to see the problem on X-Y plane
Attachments
GR.jpg
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion

by dilbert » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:23 pm
logitech -
thanks for pointing this out!
indeed, I had a mistake in my calculations. here is the corrected one:

use y<x+2 (from 1), and you have:
x+2+4<2y
y+4<x+2+4<2y
y+4<2y
4<y <== this is corrected line, earlier I had mistake here


so you have:
y>4

and
x+2>y
x+2>y>4
x+2>4
x>2


so the correct solution for the two ineq is
x>2
y>4

and answer is C .

we see from the graph logitech attached that the intersection is (2,4), so x>2;y>4 is the area that solves both ineq.

again - thank you logitech for paying attention to my fault.
this time I was lucky to get C with a mistake, but I won't be that lucky in the real test...
Join the discussion

by logitech » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:28 pm
dilbert wrote:logitech -
thanks for pointing this out! .
You are welcome
LGTCH
---------------------
"DON'T LET ANYONE STEAL YOUR DREAM!"
Join the discussion