BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
Live EA class + 6 months of EA OnDemand
  • Expert-led weekly online sessions
  • EA Masterclass access between classes
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

130-point score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

PR SC

Expert replies
by jayhawk2001 » Sat May 26, 2007 2:27 pm
Detailed explanation please...OA after a few replies.

Because the Supreme Court has ruled that the prosecution in a job discrimination case must prove not only that the employer lied about the reasons for dismissal but also that those reasons were discriminatory, plaintiffs in such cases fear that they will have no higher court that they can appeal to when their cases are decided in lower courts.

A. that they can appeal to when their cases are
B. to which to appeal after their cases have been
C. for appealing if their case has been
D. to which they can appeal if their case is
E. that their cases can appeal, if they have been
Join the discussion
Source: — Sentence Correction |

by g-madder » Sun May 27, 2007 1:45 am
I think....D. to which they can appeal if their case is

My reasoning: because each plaintiff should only have one case. this should be an 'if' situation because it is theoretical. also, as this is an "if" theoretical situation, we should use the present tense "is"
Join the discussion

by f2001290 » Sun May 27, 2007 4:17 am
A,B and E - construction is not proper.

C - "for + Verb-ing" should be followed by noun - This is Jayhawk's rule for one of my previous questions. :)

D is the one left out - So, I will go with this.
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Sun May 27, 2007 8:36 am
OA from PR is B. Not much explanation other than verb-tense is
incorrect for A, C, D and E.


Here was my approach :-).

"Plaintiffs" and "cases" are mentioned in the non-underlined portion.
So you need they/their and "cases" respectively in the underlined
part. So, rule out C and D.

E changes the meaning.

Between A and B, I thought B had awkward construction. Also "appeal to"
sounded better than "appeal". So, I went with A.
Join the discussion

• Page 1 of 1