BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

pr ds

Expert replies
by RAGS » Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:14 am
Seventy percent of the 30,000 trees in an orchard are apple trees, and the rest are pear trees. What percent of the trees in the orchard were planted this year?

(1) The number of apple trees that were planted prior to this year is 14 times the number of pear trees that were planted this year.
(2) The number of pear trees planted prior to this year is 8 times the number of pear trees that were planted this year.



I thing the ans is E
Kindly coment on the ans...........





PR gives the foll sol
From the question itself, you can calculate the number of apple trees and the number of pear trees . Statement 1alone tells you nothing, since you don't know how many apple or pear trees were planted this year, so you should write down BCE. Statement 2 gives you enough information to calculate the number of pear trees planted this year (you can make a ratio box, or just calculate ), but no information about the apple trees, so you should eliminate B. If you look at the two statements together, you know that 1,000 pear trees were planted this year, and apple trees were planted prior to this year, so apple trees were planted this year. So, of the trees were planted this year. Don't bother to turn this number into a percent: since you know you could. The answer is C
If It Is To Be It Is Up To Me
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

by f2001290 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 8:08 am
Let "x" be the no. of pines grown this year.
Let "y" be the no. of Apples grown this year.

1. Insufficient
2. Insufficent - But we can find "x" from B

From the table we can calculate (x+y)/30000, which is the required answer. Hence C
Attachments
Venn.JPG
Join the discussion

by drhomler » Tue Jun 05, 2007 11:53 am
This question seems poorly worded to me. In statement 2) it tells us that 8x as many pear trees were planted this year compared to the prior year. From the original we know there are 9000 pear trees. What if there were 8 trees planted last year and 64 this year and there were 8,928 pear trees in the ground two years ago. I feel like an assumption is being made here that isnt clearly articulated in the question. Am I reading too much into this or does anyone else see that?
Join the discussion

by drhomler » Tue Jun 05, 2007 12:13 pm
I inverted the 8x between the two years, but my point is still the same. If the question said all the trees were planted in the last two years than I could see solving the question. I am very curious about this one. Thanks o anyone who can shed some light.
Join the discussion

by jayhawk2001 » Tue Jun 05, 2007 9:41 pm
drhomler wrote:This question seems poorly worded to me. In statement 2) it tells us that 8x as many pear trees were planted this year compared to the prior year. From the original we know there are 9000 pear trees. What if there were 8 trees planted last year and 64 this year and there were 8,928 pear trees in the ground two years ago. I feel like an assumption is being made here that isnt clearly articulated in the question. Am I reading too much into this or does anyone else see that?
Agree with drhomler here.

Just as the question mentions "some are apple trees, the rest are
pear trees", it should mention "some trees were planted this year, the
rest were planted the prior year".
Join the discussion