BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Power of 3

Expert replies
by melguy » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:28 am
Hello

I am confused with what to take common when exponents are negative? To simplify 3^13 - 3^12 we take 3^12 common yielding 3^12(3-1).

But in negative power (ignoring the denominator) should I take 3^13 common ?

Thanks
Attachments
Power of 3.jpg
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by \'manpreet singh » Sat Aug 31, 2013 4:44 am
melguy wrote:Hello

I am confused with what to take common when exponents are negative? To simplify 3^13 - 3^12 we take 3^12 common yielding 3^12(3-1).

But in negative power (ignoring the denominator) should I take 3^13 common ?

Thanks
Hi Melguy,

It works the same as with positive exponents. You take the value which is common to all.
Here we can take 3^-11 as common

Eg. y= (3^-11 +3^-12+3^-13)=3^-11(1+3^-1+3^2)

Or if you are still confused you can always make the negative exponents positive by taking reciprocal and then take the common value.

Hope it helps.
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Aug 31, 2013 4:44 am
Hey melguy,

When we factor, we need to factor out the term with the smallest exponent.

EXAMPLES:
k^5 + k^3 = k^3(k^2 + 1) [here 3 is the smallest exponent]

m^19 + m^15 = m^15(m^4 + 1) [here 15 is the smallest exponent]

x^(-6) + x^(-4) + x^(-3) = x^(-6)(1 + x^2 + x^3) [here -6 is the smallest exponent]
Aside: -6 is the smallest exponent because -6 < -4 < -3

A few more:
w^x + x^(x+5) = w^x(1 + w^5)

2^x - 2^(x-2) = 2^(x-2)[2^2 - 1]

Does that help?

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by melguy » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:22 am
Hi Manpreet and Brent

Thanks for your response. Here is where my confusion lies. We take the smallest value. So 3^-13 is smaller than 3^-11. So we should take 3^-13 as common and not 3^-11. When i solve using 3^-13 i get an incorrect answer but when i 3^-11 as common I get the right answer (O.A).
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:53 am
melguy wrote:Hi Manpreet and Brent

Thanks for your response. Here is where my confusion lies. We take the smallest value. So 3^-13 is smaller than 3^-11. So we should take 3^-13 as common and not 3^-11. When i solve using 3^-13 i get an incorrect answer but when i 3^-11 as common I get the right answer (O.A).
Let's factor 3^(-11) + 3^(-12) + 3^(-13)
Since the smallest exponent is -13, we get:
3^(-13)[3^2 + 3^1 + 1]
= 3^(-13)[13]

Having said all of that about factoring, we can solve the original question without factoring. Here's how I'd solve the original question:

Original question:
Image

First recognize that asking, "K is how many times Q?" is the same as asking, "What is the value of K/Q?"
For example, asking "15 is how many times 3?" is the same as asking, "What is the value of 15/3?"

So, for the original question, we are asking, "What is the value of [3^(-11)/2 + 3^(-12)/4 + 3^(-13)/6]/3^(-14)?

At this point, I better go to image-mode:
Image

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion

by \'manpreet singh » Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:28 am
melguy wrote:Hi Manpreet and Brent

Thanks for your response. Here is where my confusion lies. We take the smallest value. So 3^-13 is smaller than 3^-11. So we should take 3^-13 as common and not 3^-11. When i solve using 3^-13 i get an incorrect answer but when i 3^-11 as common I get the right answer (O.A).
Hi Melguy,

Just simply convert the negative exponents to positive by reciprocal and do it as you normally do,and btw you can take 3^-13 also common and still get the right answer.But i suggest to make the exponents signs positive as you might get confused again on exam day.

Best of Luck!
Join the discussion

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:57 am
melguy wrote:Hi Manpreet and Brent

Thanks for your response. Here is where my confusion lies. We take the smallest value. So 3^-13 is smaller than 3^-11. So we should take 3^-13 as common and not 3^-11. When i solve using 3^-13 i get an incorrect answer but when i 3^-11 as common I get the right answer (O.A).
it doesn't matter that 3^-13 is smaller than 3^-11.
When factoring, look at the exponents only.
-13 is smaller than -11, so factor out the 3^-13

Here's another way to look at it:
How would you factor x^3 - x^2?
Since we don't know the value of x, we can't determine whether x^3 is smaller than x^2, or vice versa. So, the relative sizes of x^3 and x^2 don't matter.
All we need to do is recognize that 2 is less than 3, we we factor out x^2 to get x^2(x - 1)

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image
Join the discussion