BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Student election

This topic has expert replies
Post new topic Locked
Previous Topic Next Topic
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 489
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:10 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:5 members

Student election

by gmatblood » Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:35 am
Some mathematicians argue that to permit a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality vote is like ranking a student who earned three A's and two F's higher than one who got two A's and three B's

to permit a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality vote is like ranking a student
permitting a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student
permitting a candidate to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students

Between E and C!
Top
Source: — Sentence Correction |
Legendary Member
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 11:16 am
Thanked: 37 times
Followed by:8 members

by saketk » Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:42 am
gmatblood wrote:Some mathematicians argue that to permit a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality vote is like ranking a student who earned three A's and two F's higher than one who got two A's and three B's

to permit a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality vote is like ranking a student
permitting a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student
permitting a candidate to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students

Between E and C!
I would rather choose OPTION D

for the skeptics -- there is no pronoun ambiguity here with 'they'
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:15 am
Location: London
Thanked: 122 times
Followed by:22 members

by throughmba » Thu Oct 20, 2011 9:42 am
subject verb agreement (Candidate and They)
parallelism

A better explanation I had read earlier on BTG only.
https://www.beatthegmat.com/mba/2009/09/ ... -questions
ThroughMBA Consulting
The No. 1 B-School Admission Consulting of U.K. is now the most Affordable.

https://throughmba.com
email : [email protected]

Alex Wilkins
Senior Admission Consultant, ThroughMBA.com
Panelist | MBA Admissions Achievers Meet
Interviewer | MIT Sloan | Former
Management Consultant | McKinsey & Company | Former

"Regardless of who you are or what you have been, You can make what you want to be."
Top
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 6:48 am

by indi » Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:05 pm
What is OA...IMO E..
Candidates...they, Ranking requires students..
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1239
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 6:25 am
Thanked: 233 times
Followed by:26 members
GMAT Score:680

by sam2304 » Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:33 am
Mixed between C/D. D seems more clear with meaning but there is a pronoun issue.
C is lacking parallelism.
E uses plural students - higher than one who got should have singular student.

What is the OA ?
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
https://gmatandbeyond.blogspot.in/
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:15 am
Location: London
Thanked: 122 times
Followed by:22 members

by throughmba » Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:09 am
Mixed between C/D. D seems more clear with meaning but there is a pronoun issue.
C is lacking parallelism.
E uses plural students - higher than one who got should have singular student.

What is the OA ?
OA is official Answer
ThroughMBA Consulting
The No. 1 B-School Admission Consulting of U.K. is now the most Affordable.

https://throughmba.com
email : [email protected]

Alex Wilkins
Senior Admission Consultant, ThroughMBA.com
Panelist | MBA Admissions Achievers Meet
Interviewer | MIT Sloan | Former
Management Consultant | McKinsey & Company | Former

"Regardless of who you are or what you have been, You can make what you want to be."
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 6:44 pm
Location: UK
Thanked: 21 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:680

by rohangupta83 » Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:18 am
IMO C

plural candidates for "they"
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 627
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by mankey » Sat Oct 22, 2011 11:40 am
Some expert please reply on this. Can 'student' and 'they' go together?

Thanks.
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 6:15 am
Location: London
Thanked: 122 times
Followed by:22 members

by throughmba » Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:10 pm
mankey wrote:Some expert please reply on this. Can 'student' and 'they' go together?

Thanks.
Hi

Candidate is being linked to they here and not student.

This is an inappropriate use of a pronoun: "they". "they" is never used to refer to a third-person singular noun ("candidate") on the GMAT.
ThroughMBA Consulting
The No. 1 B-School Admission Consulting of U.K. is now the most Affordable.

https://throughmba.com
email : [email protected]

Alex Wilkins
Senior Admission Consultant, ThroughMBA.com
Panelist | MBA Admissions Achievers Meet
Interviewer | MIT Sloan | Former
Management Consultant | McKinsey & Company | Former

"Regardless of who you are or what you have been, You can make what you want to be."
Top
User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 8:21 am
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:1 members

by rohit_gmat » Sat Oct 22, 2011 10:10 pm
wait a min.. none of these make sense.. i checked the post that throughmba was talking abt and that says :

"
Thus, the sentence should read:
Some mathematicians argue that permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student who earned three A's and two F's higher than one who got two A's and three B's.
" .. but this isnt there in any of the ACs....

@ saketk - and they say " You may see an inappropriate use of a pronoun: "they". Never use "they" to refer to a third-person singular noun ("candidate") on the GMAT"

@ gmatblood - r u sure the AC have been copied correctly?
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Sat Oct 22, 2011 11:22 pm
IMO E

A) to permit a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality vote is like ranking a student
B) permitting a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
C) permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student (weird construction)
D) permitting a candidate to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
E) to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:13 am
smackmartine wrote:IMO E

C) permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student (weird construction)
E) to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students
Hi Smack,

I agree that C is weird: permitting candidates TO WIN...IS LIKE permitting candidates TO RANK (1st and 2nd part are different elements but the sentence tries to refer 'permitting students' to both part of the sentence).

My confusion is in E: do you think we need to have ||llel phrase before IS - that is 'TO PERMIT CANDIDATES....IS LIKE TO RANK...' instead of 'TO PERMIT CANDIDATES....IS LIKE RANKing...'

Thanks
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sun Oct 23, 2011 7:31 am
gmatblood wrote:Some mathematicians argue that to permit a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality vote is like ranking a student who earned three A's and two F's higher than one who got two A's and three B's

to permit a candidate to win an election because theyhave won a plurality vote is like ranking a student
permitting a candidate to win an election because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student
permitting a candidate to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking a student
to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students

Between E and C!
Top
User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 3:22 pm
Thanked: 112 times
Followed by:13 members

by smackmartine » Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:38 am
patanjali.purpose wrote:
smackmartine wrote:IMO E

C) permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student (weird construction)
E) to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students
Hi Smack,

I agree that C is weird: permitting candidates TO WIN...IS LIKE permitting candidates TO RANK (1st and 2nd part are different elements but the sentence tries to refer 'permitting students' to both part of the sentence).

My confusion is in E: do you think we need to have ||llel phrase before IS - that is 'TO PERMIT CANDIDATES....IS LIKE TO RANK...' instead of 'TO PERMIT CANDIDATES....IS LIKE RANKing...'

Thanks
Hi Patanjali,

In Option E


Here to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is a noun phrase.
A noun phrase can be parallel to a gerund(ranking students in this case).

Note: to permit in this context is not an infinitive. Only if "TO+Verb" indicates INTENTION, we consider it infinitive. However, that is not the case here.The whole part acts as a noun phrase.

Also, Like must be followed /used to compare nouns,pronouns and noun phrases(See MGMT Comparison chapter ). So, your example doesn't fit in because of this restriction.

Hope it helps!
Smack is Back ...
It takes time and effort to explain, so if my comment helped you please press Thanks button :)
Top
Legendary Member
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
Thanked: 114 times
Followed by:12 members

by patanjali.purpose » Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:27 am
smackmartine wrote:
patanjali.purpose wrote:
smackmartine wrote:IMO E

C) permitting candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like to rank a student (weird construction)
E) to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is like ranking students
Hi Smack,

I agree that C is weird: permitting candidates TO WIN...IS LIKE permitting candidates TO RANK (1st and 2nd part are different elements but the sentence tries to refer 'permitting students' to both part of the sentence).

My confusion is in E: do you think we need to have ||llel phrase before IS - that is 'TO PERMIT CANDIDATES....IS LIKE TO RANK...' instead of 'TO PERMIT CANDIDATES....IS LIKE RANKing...'

Thanks
Hi Patanjali,

In Option E


Here to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes is a noun phrase.
A noun phrase can be parallel to a gerund(ranking students in this case).

Note: to permit in this context is not an infinitive. Only if "TO+Verb" indicates INTENTION, we consider it infinitive. However, that is not the case here.The whole part acts as a noun phrase.

Also, Like must be followed /used to compare nouns,pronouns and noun phrases(See MGMT Comparison chapter ). So, your example doesn't fit in because of this restriction.

Hope it helps!
Hi Smack,

Very impressive explanation. I did not realize "to permit candidates to win elections because they have won a plurality of votes" is a noun phrase till you told me. Thanks, I missed that completely.

Thanks
Top
Post new topic Locked