BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

post deleted..

Expert replies
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

nandansingh wrote:If s and t are two different numbers on number line, is s+t equal to 0 ?
1. The distance between s and 0 is the same as the distance between t and 0.
2. 0 is between s and t.

OA: a
question stem:
s+t=0, this can only be possible if s and t have the same absolute value but different signs.
therefore, we are just trying to find if lsl = ltl ?

Statement I
ls-0l = lt-0l
lsl = ltl
Sufficient.

Statement II

We dont know if s and t have the same absolute value, we just know that one is negative and one is positive.

Hence A.

Hope this helps.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

parallel_chase wrote:
nandansingh wrote:If s and t are two different numbers on number line, is s+t equal to 0 ?
1. The distance between s and 0 is the same as the distance between t and 0.
2. 0 is between s and t.

OA: a
question stem:
s+t=0, this can only be possible if s and t have the same absolute value but different signs.
therefore, we are just trying to find if lsl = ltl ?

Statement I
ls-0l = lt-0l
lsl = ltl
Sufficient.

Statement II

We dont know if s and t have the same absolute value, we just know that one is negative and one is positive.

Hence A.

Hope this helps.
One doubt...
Statement-2: Zero is between s and t.
Does that not mean that 0 is right in-between and hence the midpoint between s and t. hence s and t have same absolute value but opposite sign. hence s+t=0!
Join the discussion

nandansingh wrote: One doubt...
Statement-2: Zero is between s and t.
Does that not mean that 0 is right in-between and hence the midpoint between s and t. hence s and t have same absolute value but opposite sign. hence s+t=0!
I think that would be an assumption.

If the statement would have said " 0 is half way between s and t" then probably we would have taken 0 as the mid point.

But in this case,

if s= -3 and t=5

we can still say that 0 is between s and t, but we dont know 0 is how far away from s and t.

Hope this helps.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by nandansingh » Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:10 am
Thanks a lot parallel_chase!!!
You simply rocked the show!!!
GOD BLESS YOU.
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:34 am
parallel_chase,

I believe statement 1 is not sufficient on its own:

If |s| = |t|, this can be satisfied for eg. by (s,t) = (5, -5) and (s,t) = (5, 5). Both will yield different answers to the question stem while still keeping statement 1 true. Therefore, it is insufficient.

Together with the info from statement 2, you can prove that s and t have different signs, hence answer C.

Let me know what you think.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by krazy800 » Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:08 am
s and t should be different numbers as given in the problem.......
Aiming High
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:06 am
krazy800 wrote:s and t should be different numbers as given in the problem.......
you're right!!... :D. I really need to stop doing silly mistakes like this...

-BM-
Join the discussion