Live GMAT classes with Target Test Prep start Nov 21 and Nov 22. First class free.

See classes
Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
GMATLiveTeachStarts Nov 22
Josh Braslow, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Josh Braslow, 20+ years in test prep

Nov 22 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemandStart anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

with

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemandStart anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

post deleted..

Expert replies
by nandansingh » Fri Oct 31, 2008 5:20 am
this post has been deleted.
Last edited by nandansingh on Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Join the discussion
Source: — Data Sufficiency |

nandansingh wrote:If s and t are two different numbers on number line, is s+t equal to 0 ?
1. The distance between s and 0 is the same as the distance between t and 0.
2. 0 is between s and t.

OA: a
question stem:
s+t=0, this can only be possible if s and t have the same absolute value but different signs.
therefore, we are just trying to find if lsl = ltl ?

Statement I
ls-0l = lt-0l
lsl = ltl
Sufficient.

Statement II

We dont know if s and t have the same absolute value, we just know that one is negative and one is positive.

Hence A.

Hope this helps.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

parallel_chase wrote:
nandansingh wrote:If s and t are two different numbers on number line, is s+t equal to 0 ?
1. The distance between s and 0 is the same as the distance between t and 0.
2. 0 is between s and t.

OA: a
question stem:
s+t=0, this can only be possible if s and t have the same absolute value but different signs.
therefore, we are just trying to find if lsl = ltl ?

Statement I
ls-0l = lt-0l
lsl = ltl
Sufficient.

Statement II

We dont know if s and t have the same absolute value, we just know that one is negative and one is positive.

Hence A.

Hope this helps.
One doubt...
Statement-2: Zero is between s and t.
Does that not mean that 0 is right in-between and hence the midpoint between s and t. hence s and t have same absolute value but opposite sign. hence s+t=0!
Join the discussion

nandansingh wrote: One doubt...
Statement-2: Zero is between s and t.
Does that not mean that 0 is right in-between and hence the midpoint between s and t. hence s and t have same absolute value but opposite sign. hence s+t=0!
I think that would be an assumption.

If the statement would have said " 0 is half way between s and t" then probably we would have taken 0 as the mid point.

But in this case,

if s= -3 and t=5

we can still say that 0 is between s and t, but we dont know 0 is how far away from s and t.

Hope this helps.
No rest for the Wicked....
Join the discussion

by nandansingh » Fri Oct 31, 2008 6:10 am
Thanks a lot parallel_chase!!!
You simply rocked the show!!!
GOD BLESS YOU.
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Sun Nov 02, 2008 9:34 am
parallel_chase,

I believe statement 1 is not sufficient on its own:

If |s| = |t|, this can be satisfied for eg. by (s,t) = (5, -5) and (s,t) = (5, 5). Both will yield different answers to the question stem while still keeping statement 1 true. Therefore, it is insufficient.

Together with the info from statement 2, you can prove that s and t have different signs, hence answer C.

Let me know what you think.

-BM-
Join the discussion

by krazy800 » Sun Nov 02, 2008 10:08 am
s and t should be different numbers as given in the problem.......
Aiming High
Join the discussion

by bluementor » Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:06 am
krazy800 wrote:s and t should be different numbers as given in the problem.......
you're right!!... :D. I really need to stop doing silly mistakes like this...

-BM-
Join the discussion