Positive integer.. can someone help please

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 5:20 am
Location: Middle East
Hi,
Can some tell me how to solve this problem .. i am half way. It is from the official GMAT Quant review 2nd edition page 70.

When positive integer n divide by 5 the remainder is 1. when n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest integer K such that K+n is a mutiple of 35.

a) 3
b) 4
c) 12
d) 32
e) 35

Thank you for your help and support
Best Regards
Source: — Problem Solving |

Legendary Member
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 2:33 pm
Thanked: 158 times
Followed by:21 members

by pemdas » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:56 am
n=5a+1 and n=7b+3
find k when (n+k)/35

solution&explanation: the number can be divided by 35 (prime factorization -> 5*7) when it's divided by both 5 and 7. Because n is not divisible neither by 5 (remainder 1) nor by 7 (remainder 3) we conclude that for n to be divided by both 5 and 7 it must be added first the remainder 1 and then 7, as 5 is not divisible by 7 and we need our (n+k) to be divisible by both 5 and 7. So it's (1+7)=8.
scorpion1978 wrote:Hi,
Can some tell me how to solve this problem .. i am half way. It is from the official GMAT Quant review 2nd edition page 70.

When positive integer n divide by 5 the remainder is 1. when n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest integer K such that K+n is a mutiple of 35.

a) 3
b) 4
c) 12
d) 32
e) 35

Thank you for your help and support
Best Regards
Last edited by pemdas on Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Success doesn't come overnight!

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:56 am
When positive integer n is divided by 5, the remainder is 1. When n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest positive integer k such that k+n is a multiple of 35?

(A) 3
(B) 4
(C) 12
(D) 32
(E) 35
For many test-takers, the best approach will be to make a list of values for n.

When positive integer n is divided by the divisor D, the remainder is R.

Given the information above, the smallest possible value of n will be the remainder R.
To determine the other possible values of n, just keep adding multiples of the divisor D.

When positive integer n is divided by 5, the remainder is 1.
Smallest n = 1.
Now add multiples of 5:
1,6,11,16,21,26,31...

When positive integer n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3.
Smallest n = 3.
Now add multiples of 7:
3,10,17,24,31...

The smallest value included in both lists is n=31.

Now we can plug in the answers, which represent the smallest possible value of k.
When the correct answer is added to n=31, the sum will be a multiple of 35.
Since we need the smallest possible value of k, we should start with the smallest answer choice.

Answer choice A: k=3
n+k = 31+3 = 34. Not a multiple of 35.
Eliminate A.

Answer choice B: k=4
n+k = 31+4 = 35. Success!

The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1309
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 5:34 am
Location: India
Thanked: 310 times
Followed by:123 members
GMAT Score:750

by cans » Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:07 am
When positive integer n divide by 5 the remainder is 1. when n is divided by 7, the remainder is 3. What is the smallest integer K such that K+n is a mutiple of 35.

a) 3
b) 4
c) 12
d) 32
e) 35
let p,q be 2 integers.
Then n can be written as 5p+1 and 7q+3.
5p+1 = 7q+3
5p=7q+2
p=(7q+2)/5
As p is an integer, 7q+2 is multiple of 5.
q=4 makes p=6
Thus n can be 31 (one of the many possible values)
if we add 4 to n, it will become 35 and thus will be divisible by 35
IMO B
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button ;)

Contact me about long distance tutoring!
[email protected]

Cans!!

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 8
Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 5:20 am
Location: Middle East

by scorpion1978 » Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:48 am
Thank you for all your swift replies....got it now.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Feb 13, 2011 7:58 pm

by akovalev » Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:29 pm
Question here--please help the non-mathematically-inclined! I had to use a more abstract and primitive approach. Since (k + n) has to be divisible by 5*7, and n is divisible by neither, k must compensate for the missing integer units. The remainder of n/5 is 1, so if n were 4 units larger, it would've been divisible by 5; the remainder of n/7 is 3--so n is lacking 4 units to be divisible by 7. Thus, I reasoned, k has to equal 4 to make its sum with n divisible by both 5 and 7. Was this a legitimate approach, or was I simply lucky in getting the correct answer? [This is important for me to know, since the proper mathematical approach described above would evaporate from my brain in 10 minutes; if I could use my primitive line of thought for such problems, I'd rather do that than attempt to start speaking the same language as the writers of the OG answer explanations.]