BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Popcorn sales

Expert replies
by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:39 am
In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim?

A. Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania’s movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.

B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.

C. Moviemania’s customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.

D. Total attendance at Moviemania’s movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.

E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.

----------------------------------
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:45 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:03 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:IMO A
Can you please explain your answer ?
Gearing up for the D-day.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:11 am
the question is asking u to counter what moviemania is claiming.

consider the scenario where all the refreshments increased by less than 5 % and if pop corn sales increased by 5% .. it means that the sales of pop corn has increased..

Are you able to understand ?

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:25 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:the question is asking u to counter what moviemania is claiming.

consider the scenario where all the refreshments increased by less than 5 % and if pop corn sales increased by 5% .. it means that the sales of pop corn has increased..

Are you able to understand ?

Regards,
Vignesh
-----------------

Thanks Vignesh for the explanation, but i still beg to differ.

When choosing option 'A', one will assume, that moviemania is comapring (when it says "its popcorn sales is hurt") its the popcorn sales increase vis-avis other refreshment sales increase.
However, it is no where mentioned in the passage that moviemania is comparing its popcorn sales with the sales of other refreshments.

It is possible that, Popcorn is a very fast moving item, and it is natural that its sales is more than the sales of other refreshments.

It becomes further clear that moviemania is comparing its Popcorn sales increase in one year with the Popcorn sales increase in another year by the line
"That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year. "

Thus, when moviemania says "its popcorn sales is hurt", it is sales in one year as compared to sales in another year.
Thus the sales of refreshments should be irrelevant.
As such "A" is out.

Please let me know your opinion.
Gearing up for the D-day.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:14 pm
Hi annakool1009,

Let me try explaining in a better way.

The below is just an eg:
Lets assume u owned moviemania .
As refreshments u r selling popcorn , coke and ice cream.

The first year u owned it lets say that revenue from all refreshments was rs 900. let the sales of each item be 300 respectively.

The next year . Lets the sales of all other refreshments increased by less than 10 % and pop corn increases by 10 % .

This means coke and icecream could hav made a profit of lesser than 30rs but pop corn has made a sale of 30 rs.

Would u say that pop corn sales has hurt u ? I dont think so.

Here comparison wiht other refreshments are done to prove that popcorn sold more than the other item.

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:16 pm
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Hi annakool1009,

Let me try explaining in a better way.

The below is just an eg:
Lets assume u owned moviemania .
As refreshments u r selling popcorn , coke and ice cream.

The first year u owned it lets say that revenue from all refreshments was rs 900. let the sales of each item be 300 respectively.

The next year . Lets the sales of all other refreshments increased by less than 10 % and pop corn increases by 10 % .

This means coke and icecream could hav made a profit of lesser than 30rs but pop corn has made a sale of 30 rs.

Would u say that pop corn sales has hurt u ? I dont think so.

Here comparison wiht other refreshments are done to prove that popcorn sold more than the other item.

Regards,
Vignesh
So u mean when total is 900
300 each
total increases by say 8%
972
popcorn increase by 10%
330
972-330 = 642 / 2 ===> 321

330 > 321

Therfore A hold true



Bang on !!!
Join the discussion