BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0563 reviews
Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026 winner: Target Test Prep, #1 Test Prep
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE AWARDS 2026

Target Test Prep was voted #1 Best Test Prep in the 2026 Newsweek Readers’ Choice™ Awards.

GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Popcorn sales

Expert replies
by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:39 am
In January of last year the Moviemania chain of movie theaters started propping its popcorn in canola oil, instead of the less healthful coconut oil that it had been using until then. Now Moviemania is planning to switch back, saying that the change has hurt popcorn sales. That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument against Moviemania’s claim?

A. Total sales of all refreshments at Moviemania’s movie theaters increased by less than 5 percent last year.

B. Moviemania makes more money on food and beverages sold at its theaters than it does on sales of movie tickets.

C. Moviemania’s customers prefer the taste of popcorn popped in coconut oil to that of popcorn popped in canola oil.

D. Total attendance at Moviemania’s movie theaters was more than 20 percent higher last year than the year before.

E. The year before last, Moviemania experienced a 10 percent increase in popcorn sales over the previous year.

----------------------------------
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:45 am
IMO A
Join the discussion

by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:03 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:IMO A
Can you please explain your answer ?
Gearing up for the D-day.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:11 am
the question is asking u to counter what moviemania is claiming.

consider the scenario where all the refreshments increased by less than 5 % and if pop corn sales increased by 5% .. it means that the sales of pop corn has increased..

Are you able to understand ?

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by annakool1009 » Mon Aug 04, 2008 5:25 am
Vignesh.4384 wrote:the question is asking u to counter what moviemania is claiming.

consider the scenario where all the refreshments increased by less than 5 % and if pop corn sales increased by 5% .. it means that the sales of pop corn has increased..

Are you able to understand ?

Regards,
Vignesh
-----------------

Thanks Vignesh for the explanation, but i still beg to differ.

When choosing option 'A', one will assume, that moviemania is comapring (when it says "its popcorn sales is hurt") its the popcorn sales increase vis-avis other refreshment sales increase.
However, it is no where mentioned in the passage that moviemania is comparing its popcorn sales with the sales of other refreshments.

It is possible that, Popcorn is a very fast moving item, and it is natural that its sales is more than the sales of other refreshments.

It becomes further clear that moviemania is comparing its Popcorn sales increase in one year with the Popcorn sales increase in another year by the line
"That claim is false, however, since according to Moviemania’s own sales figures, Moviemania sold 5 percent more popcorn last year than in the previous year. "

Thus, when moviemania says "its popcorn sales is hurt", it is sales in one year as compared to sales in another year.
Thus the sales of refreshments should be irrelevant.
As such "A" is out.

Please let me know your opinion.
Gearing up for the D-day.
Join the discussion

by Vignesh.4384 » Tue Aug 05, 2008 6:14 pm
Hi annakool1009,

Let me try explaining in a better way.

The below is just an eg:
Lets assume u owned moviemania .
As refreshments u r selling popcorn , coke and ice cream.

The first year u owned it lets say that revenue from all refreshments was rs 900. let the sales of each item be 300 respectively.

The next year . Lets the sales of all other refreshments increased by less than 10 % and pop corn increases by 10 % .

This means coke and icecream could hav made a profit of lesser than 30rs but pop corn has made a sale of 30 rs.

Would u say that pop corn sales has hurt u ? I dont think so.

Here comparison wiht other refreshments are done to prove that popcorn sold more than the other item.

Regards,
Vignesh
Join the discussion

by mmslf75 » Sat Dec 26, 2009 11:16 pm
Vignesh.4384 wrote:Hi annakool1009,

Let me try explaining in a better way.

The below is just an eg:
Lets assume u owned moviemania .
As refreshments u r selling popcorn , coke and ice cream.

The first year u owned it lets say that revenue from all refreshments was rs 900. let the sales of each item be 300 respectively.

The next year . Lets the sales of all other refreshments increased by less than 10 % and pop corn increases by 10 % .

This means coke and icecream could hav made a profit of lesser than 30rs but pop corn has made a sale of 30 rs.

Would u say that pop corn sales has hurt u ? I dont think so.

Here comparison wiht other refreshments are done to prove that popcorn sold more than the other item.

Regards,
Vignesh
So u mean when total is 900
300 each
total increases by say 8%
972
popcorn increase by 10%
330
972-330 = 642 / 2 ===> 321

330 > 321

Therfore A hold true



Bang on !!!
Join the discussion