-
cfoley
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2008 10:10 am
- Location: Phoenix
- GMAT Score:740
My current supervisor (who is not a native English speaker) emailed me a copy of one of the letters of rec he wrote for me, and while the letter happens to be very complimentary, it's also really poorly written. It's pretty much a mess; it doesn't always answer the questions directly (although it does hit on all the major points over the course of the letter), there are strangely worded phrases, odd uses of punctuation, a few grammar mistakes, some repetition, and a non-sequitor or two.
Will admissions committees generally be able to look past the writing and consider the content of the letter, or will a poorly written letter get in the way too much?
His name does not necessarily give away the fact that he is not a native English speaker, so I don't really have that to fall back on. He gave me the opportunity to give him some input, and I don't feel comfortable flat out telling him that he is a terrible writer, or rewriting the letter myself or anything like that, so I just made some really basic suggestions so that what was there was a bit easier to read.
Anyway, what do you think? Am I in trouble, or will adcom look past the poor writing and see that it is a great endorsement?
(By the way, I'm applying at UCLA, Stanford, HBS, and maybe Chicago and USC, in case it's relevant.)
Will admissions committees generally be able to look past the writing and consider the content of the letter, or will a poorly written letter get in the way too much?
His name does not necessarily give away the fact that he is not a native English speaker, so I don't really have that to fall back on. He gave me the opportunity to give him some input, and I don't feel comfortable flat out telling him that he is a terrible writer, or rewriting the letter myself or anything like that, so I just made some really basic suggestions so that what was there was a bit easier to read.
Anyway, what do you think? Am I in trouble, or will adcom look past the poor writing and see that it is a great endorsement?
(By the way, I'm applying at UCLA, Stanford, HBS, and maybe Chicago and USC, in case it's relevant.)

















