BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
Vote for Target Test Prep, Newsweek Readers’ Choice Awards 2026
NEWSWEEK READERS’ CHOICE 2026

BIG NEWS! Target Test Prep has been nominated, and they’d love your vote!

TTP has worked incredibly hard to build the best test prep experience possible, and winning Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep would mean a lot to them. If TTP has helped you, they’d be incredibly grateful for your vote. You can vote once each day through September 9.

Vote for TTP
GMATLiveTeach 7 seats left
Chris Peckover
NEXT LIVE COHORT

Oct 13 to Jan 7, 2027

with Chris Peckover

Schedule
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Included
40 live hours + 6 months of GMAT OnDemand
  • Live instruction and real-time questions
  • Class recordings and assigned practice
View class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeach 5 seats left
Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll
Limited cohort · enrollment openTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

POLICE CHASE

Expert replies
by pappueshwar » Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:48 am
In a certain municipality, a judge overturned a suspect's conviction for possession of an illegal weapon. The suspect had fled upon seeing police and subsequently discarded the illegal weapon after the police gave chase. The judge reasoned as follows: the only cause for the police giving chase was the suspect's flight; by itself, flight from the police does not create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act; evidence collected during an illegal chase is inadmissible; therefore, the evidence in this case was inadmissible.

Which one of the following principles, if valid, most helps to justify the judge's decision that the evidence was inadmissible?
(A) Flight from the police could create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act as long as other significant factors are involved.
(B) People can legally flee from the police only when those people are not involved in a criminal act at the time.
(C) Police can legally give chase to a person only when the person's actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act.
(D) Flight from the police should not itself be considered a criminal act.
(E) In all cases in which a person's actions have created a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act, police can legally give chase to that person

confused btw C & E . OA IS C
Join the discussion
Source: — Critical Reasoning |

by GmatKiss » Mon Mar 26, 2012 9:42 pm
What is the source of this question.

Need help from experts to crack this.
Join the discussion

by scholardream » Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:13 pm
Hi,
My approach is underneath:
Premise 1: a judge OVERTURNED a suspect's conviction for possession of an illegal weapon.
Premise 2: the suspect had FLED upong seeing police & subsequently DISCARDED the illegal weapon after the police gave chase
Premise 3: Judege reason: police gave chase was the suspect's flight & the FLIGHT doesn't create a reasonable suspicion of a crimnal act & evidence is INADMISSIBLE
Conclusion: the evidence was INADMISSABLE

Question: Valid the justify of judge's decision -> give a link between the Judege reason: police gave chase was the suspect's flight & the FLIGHT doesn't create a reasonable suspicion of a crimnal act and evidence is INADMISSIBLE or I have to look for a reason why the chase of police is legal
(A) 'Other significant factors are involved' -> we don't have any information on significant factors in the passage.
(B) it's about People side, not police side. Please remember that in the passage, it talks only about police side
(C) It states that Police can LEGALLY give chase to a person ONLY when the person's actions have created a reasonable suspicion of criminal act.
Reasonable suspicion -> Police chase: the police chase is legal
In premise: suspect fled -> police chase -> weapon discarded. According to (C), the police chase is illegal -> Correct! It's what I'm looking for
(D) It paraphrases the premise 3 & doesn't give additional information
(E) If this sentence is correct, then the police chase is legal and evidence collected is ADMISSABLE -> it attached the conclusion.
Therefore, my answer is (C)
Join the discussion

by agarwalmanoj2000 » Wed Mar 28, 2012 5:47 pm
Strengthen evidence was inadmissible.

(A) Flight from the police could create a reasonable suspicion of a criminal act as long as other significant factors are involved. => Weakens as it justifies flight could create a reasonable suspicion.
(B) People can legally flee from the police only when those people are not involved in a criminal act at the time. => Weakens as it makes suspect guilty because he was in possession of an illegal weapon.
(D) Flight from the police should not itself be considered a criminal act. => Repeats the premises and no new information, so neither strengthen or weakens

Stuck between C and E as both strengthens the conclusion by making the police chase illegal and hence evidence inadmissible.

Experts please help.
Join the discussion