The question is attached below. Please explain your answers.
- Attachments
-
Wanna know what I'm upto? Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/harikrish
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
IMO C. I was between C & E, but I felt E contradicted the premise of the argument & C has a reason for why people might not live longer even after volunteering (because of the disease that is temporarily masked)hk wrote:The question is attached below. Please explain your answers.
IMO A.hk wrote:The question is attached below. Please explain your answers.
Agree with above explanation and hence An_niaz wrote:IMO = A
It goes to show that endorphins / volunteer work is not the cause of long life. People predisposed to long life were already volunteering.
please lemme know whether the next best answer in this question is B, right.. that is if A were not an option then B should be the answer in that case.. right??chintanjadwani wrote:i guess u might have got confused in the language of the last line...bcos i had to read it thrice, then i got it...
''the statistic would be what you would expect it to be...''
means that the statistic result that ''volunteers live longer than non volunteers'' , which we got from studying the particular community would give the same result even if that community were not volunteering..
hope you're getting it..
the question asks that even if we study the volunteering community or the nonvolounteering , we will get the result that they live longer!!
How is that possible?
because the study involved women volunteers,
reason:- women generally live more than men (damn...)) lol...
so even if these women were not volunteers or not volunteers we'd conclude that they i.e. 'women volunteers'' live more than men..
so the statistic would be the same for both ....
phew!!
hope this helps
New here Create free account