Yes, it is C, though your first equation should read x+k = 2. If you solve, you should find x=2 and k=0.jeffxujian wrote:Ian:Ian Stewart wrote:I'm pretty sure Q3 is supposed to read:
Q3. Is x>k?
1. (2^x)(2^k)=4
2. (9^x)(3^k)=81.
Then the statements are not contradictory.
Is the correct answer of the above question C?
1. x+k=4 insufficient, because x, k can be any numbers
2.2x+k=4 insufficient, same drill as above
combine 1 with 2, x=0 and K=4, thus the result is sufficient to answer question whether x is greater than k.
Please correct me if i made any mistakes. Thank!
BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course
Redeem
Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand
Scott Woodbury-Stewart’s private virtual classroom — 400 hours of master-class video lessons for the GMAT Focus Edition.
- 715+ score guarantee — highest in the industry (99th percentile)
- 52 chapters · 1,500+ lessons · 4,000+ practice questions
- 400 hours of video · 1,500+ instructor-led HD smartboard lessons
- 300,000+ students accepted to Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, Booth & Sloan & more
- 24/7 live support + weekly Zoom office hours with GMAT instructors
- TTP AI Assist — 24/7 AI-powered virtual tutor for instant help
- 1,200+ flashcards + AI-powered study assistant & daily calendar
- OnDemand, LiveTeach & GMAT Bootcamp formats available
- Also: GRE, SAT Math & Executive Assessment courses
- MBA Admissions Consulting now available
- 🏆 2025 EdTech Breakthrough Award: Test Prep Solution Provider of the Year
- 200,000+ students served
- 5-day free trial — $0 to start, no auto-billing, cancel anytime
★★★★★
5.0
(559 reviews)
130-pt guarantee
$0 to start
then $127/mo
please help me with these tricky DS
Hi, Ian
Thanks for the correction. I believe that is also something for which i should watch out on the GMAT.
Thanks for the correction. I believe that is also something for which i should watch out on the GMAT.
Can somone verify answer to Q3. Is it C or Esaeed wrote: Q3. Is x>k?
1. (2x)(2k)=4
2. (9x)(3k)=81.
Please help me with most efficient approach.
Thanks in advance.
how is it that you arrived at the x+k=4 and 2x+k=4?
Ian Stewart wrote:Yes, it is C, though your first equation should read x+k = 2. If you solve, you should find x=2 and k=0.jeffxujian wrote:Ian:Ian Stewart wrote:I'm pretty sure Q3 is supposed to read:
Q3. Is x>k?
1. (2^x)(2^k)=4
2. (9^x)(3^k)=81.
Then the statements are not contradictory.
Is the correct answer of the above question C?
1. x+k=4 insufficient, because x, k can be any numbers
2.2x+k=4 insufficient, same drill as above
combine 1 with 2, x=0 and K=4, thus the result is sufficient to answer question whether x is greater than k.
Please correct me if i made any mistakes. Thank!
















