BREAKING: Target Test Prep releases Brand New 2026 On Demand GMAT prep course

Redeem

Target Test Prep · GMAT

Choose how you want to prepare

Learn live with an expert or move at your own pace. Every option includes the complete TTP study system.

★★★★★5.0559 reviews
GMATLiveTeach Starts Oct 17
Chris Peckover, Target Test Prep GMAT expert
LIVE ONLINE CLASSES

Get Ready for GMAT Test Day Faster with Live Online Classes

with Chris Peckover, 100th-Percentile GMAT Scorer

Oct 17 · Chris Peckover
Sat · 11:00 AM to 2:00 PM ET
Oct 20 · Chris Peckover
Tue, Thu · 8:00 to 10:00 PM ET
Oct 25 · Josh Braslow
Sun · 1:00 to 4:00 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes + 6 months of TTP OnDemand
  • Attend the first class for free
  • Every class is recorded, so you never fall behind
View classes & enroll
Limited seats availableTarget Test Prep
EALiveTeachOnDemand 5 seats left Start anytime
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Target Test Prep EA OnDemand

Self-paced EA prep. Study on your schedule.

Logan Thompson
EXECUTIVE ASSESSMENT

Sep 6 to Dec 6, 2026

with Logan Thompson

165+ EA score guarantee
$05-day trial no automatic billing
Schedule
Sun · 9:30 AM to 12:30 PM ET
Included
40 hours of live online classes plus six months of access to the complete TTP EA OnDemand course.
  • 165+ EA Score Guarantee
  • 4,100+ Quant, Verbal, and Integrated Reasoning practice questions
  • 400+ hours of in-depth video lessons
  • 3,000+ step-by-step video solutions
View EA class & enroll Start free 5-day trial
Limited cohort · enrollment openTrial includes full course accessTarget Test Prep
GMATOnDemand Start anytime
SELF-PACED MASTERCLASS

Target Test Prep GMAT OnDemand

Complete access from day one. Study on your schedule.

715+ score guarantee
$0to start then $127/mo
  • Personalized study plan and analytics
  • Thousands of lessons and practice questions

Compare the format, schedule, and included access before enrolling. Prices and seat counts shown reflect the supplied offer details.

Please break the math into small parts

Expert replies
by rrobiinn » Tue May 29, 2012 8:19 pm
Which values of x are solutions to the inequality [x + 1] + [x - 1] <= 2 ( the sign means less than equal, third bracket means absolute sign.)?
(Hint: try a conceptual approach. Your answer will be an inequality as welL)
Join the discussion
Source: — Problem Solving |

by 1947 » Tue May 29, 2012 9:14 pm
|x+1|+|x-1|<=2
this means that sum of distance of x from -1 and from 1 is less or equal to 2.
|x+1| distance will be either x+1 or -x-1
|x-1| distance will be either x-1 or -x+1

so x+1+x-1<=2 => x<=1
and -x-1-x+1<=2 => -2x<=2 => x>=-1

between -1 and 1
If my post helped you- let me know by pushing the thanks button. Thanks
Join the discussion

by mdavidm_531 » Tue May 29, 2012 9:18 pm
rrobiinn wrote:Which values of x are solutions to the inequality [x + 1] + [x - 1] <= 2 ( the sign means less than equal, third bracket means absolute sign.)?
(Hint: try a conceptual approach. Your answer will be an inequality as welL)
Aha, this is also my weakness. But let me give it a shot:

The equation is: |X+1| + |X-1| <=2

Now, the first step would be to determine the critical points.
What do I mean by critical points? The critical points are the values of X that would lead the value of the expression equal to 0. It'd be easier if we apply this

See, the critical points are:

X = -1 and X = 1

How did I arrive to those values? Simple, there X + 1 = 0 as such X = -1 and x - 1 = 0 as such X = 1

Now that we have the critical points, we could go then try values (this is where the conceptual approach comes in handy)

1st step: x < -1 (so we could test x = -2 since -2 < -1)
As such we have:
|-2 + 1| + |-2-1| <=? 2 (mind the "?" as we are determining if the equation holds)
|-1| + |-3| <=? 2
1 + 3 <=? 2
4 > 2 (See, it means that for all values of x <-1, the equation doesn't hold.)

Now on to the next step:

2nd step: -1 <= x <= 1 (this is our critical points)
As such we have:
We try x = 0 (since -1<0<+1)
|0+1| + |0-1| <=? 2 (Again mind the "?")
1 + 1 <=? 2
2 = 2 (equation holds, now let's try another value of x to convince us)
We try x = 1/2
|1/2 + 1| + |1/2 - 1| <=? 2
|3/2| + |-1/2| <=? 2
3/2 + 1/2 <=2

So we see that such equation holds when -1 <= x <= +1

Now the last step would be test x > 2
So we could test x = 3
Let's see,
|3 + 1| + |3 - 1| <=? 2
4 + 2 <=? 2
6 > 2 (doesn't hold.)

Again, we conclude that such equation holds if -1 <= x <= +1
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed May 30, 2012 3:23 am
rrobiinn wrote:Which values of x are solutions to the inequality |x + 1| + |x - 1| ≤ 2?
|x + 1| + |x - 1| is nothing but the sum of the distances of x from -1 and 1 on the number line. Let us draw the number line with -1 and 1 on it.

<-------------------(-1)----0----(1)------------------->

Distance between -1 and 1 on the number line is 2. Hence, to get the sum of the distances of x from -1 and 1 on the number line less than or equal to 2, x must lie between -1 and 1. Any x outside this region will have the sum greater than 2.

Hence, the values of x that satisfies the given inequality is -1 ≤ x ≤ 1

Note : If the inequality had been |x + 1| + |x - 1| < 2, there would have been no values of x satisfying it. The reason should be evident from the number line figure.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion

by Anurag@Gurome » Wed May 30, 2012 3:28 am
mdavidm_531 wrote:...Now the last step would be test x > 2...
That should be x > 1, I believe.
Anurag Mairal, Ph.D., MBA
GMAT Expert, Admissions and Career Guidance
Gurome, Inc.
1-800-566-4043 (USA)

Join Our Facebook Groups
GMAT with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/272466352793633/
Admissions with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/461459690536574/
Career Advising with Gurome
https://www.facebook.com/groups/360435787349781/
Join the discussion