Hi, there. I'm happy to contribute to this.
If n and t are positive integers, is n a factor of t?
n is a factor of t if and only if there exist some other integer k such that n = k*t.
(1)
n = 3n - 2
This allows us to solve for the value of n, and gives us no information about t. Normally, that would be not sufficient. BUT, here
n = 3n - 2
2 = 2n
1 = n
n equals 1, which is a factor of every single positive integer. It's the universal factor. Therefore, regardless of what positive integer t is, n = 1 is a factor of it. This statement is
sufficient to give a definitive "yes" answer to the prompt question.
(2)
t = 3n
This is the very definition of a factor. If you can multiply n by an integer and get a product of t, by definition, that means n is a factor of t. This statement, by itself, is also
sufficient.
Each statement alone by itself is sufficient. Answer =
D
Here's a blog you may find helpful:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-math-factors/
Does all this make sense to you? Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Mike
